Methodologies assessing digital technologies to assist “ageing in place”: a scoping review

Q3 Nursing
Francesca Horne, Diane Bailey, Maggie Kenney
{"title":"Methodologies assessing digital technologies to assist “ageing in place”: a scoping review","authors":"Francesca Horne, Diane Bailey, Maggie Kenney","doi":"10.1108/wwop-11-2022-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Despite continuing workforce challenges over the last decade, the social care system is considered a key enabler in keeping older people out of hospital. In response to the workforce challenges, White Paper was released, which acknowledged the opportunities afforded by digital technology to assist older people ageing at home, often supported by informal caregivers. Given the policy emphasis on digital-enabled care, the most appropriate methods for evaluating its impact on social care outcomes have yet to be determined. The purpose this study was to review the current literature using a systematic approach to understand the methodological limitations to inform more robust evaluations in their use in future research. Design/methodology/approach This scoping review used a systematic approach adopting the framework of Arksey and O’Malley to examine studies examining the adoption of digital technologies to assist in older people’s ability to age in place. Findings The 21 relevant studies identified on digital technology to assist ageing-in-place are evolving. To date, it has focused on the efficacy and usability of the digital technologies themselves rather than investigating the impact of such technologies on re/enablement outcomes for older people. To rebalance this emphasis, there needs to be more research investigating the factors that enhance useability of digital technologies by older people and exploiting narrative data gained from qualitative research as they can provide valuable insights. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first scoping review to consider qualitative methodological approaches for exploring ageing in place.","PeriodicalId":53659,"journal":{"name":"Working with Older People","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working with Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-11-2022-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Despite continuing workforce challenges over the last decade, the social care system is considered a key enabler in keeping older people out of hospital. In response to the workforce challenges, White Paper was released, which acknowledged the opportunities afforded by digital technology to assist older people ageing at home, often supported by informal caregivers. Given the policy emphasis on digital-enabled care, the most appropriate methods for evaluating its impact on social care outcomes have yet to be determined. The purpose this study was to review the current literature using a systematic approach to understand the methodological limitations to inform more robust evaluations in their use in future research. Design/methodology/approach This scoping review used a systematic approach adopting the framework of Arksey and O’Malley to examine studies examining the adoption of digital technologies to assist in older people’s ability to age in place. Findings The 21 relevant studies identified on digital technology to assist ageing-in-place are evolving. To date, it has focused on the efficacy and usability of the digital technologies themselves rather than investigating the impact of such technologies on re/enablement outcomes for older people. To rebalance this emphasis, there needs to be more research investigating the factors that enhance useability of digital technologies by older people and exploiting narrative data gained from qualitative research as they can provide valuable insights. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first scoping review to consider qualitative methodological approaches for exploring ageing in place.
评估数字技术以协助“就地老龄化”的方法:范围审查
尽管在过去十年中持续存在劳动力挑战,但社会保健系统被认为是使老年人远离医院的关键因素。为了应对劳动力挑战,发布了白皮书,其中承认数字技术提供的机会,可以帮助在家养老的老年人,通常由非正式护理人员提供支持。鉴于数字化护理的政策重点,评估其对社会护理结果影响的最合适方法尚未确定。本研究的目的是用系统的方法来回顾当前的文献,以了解方法学的局限性,以便在未来的研究中对其使用进行更有力的评估。设计/方法/方法本次范围审查采用了一种采用Arksey和O 'Malley框架的系统方法来检查有关采用数字技术以帮助老年人就地养老的研究。已确定的21项有关数字技术协助原地老龄化的相关研究正在不断发展。迄今为止,它的重点是数字技术本身的有效性和可用性,而不是调查这些技术对老年人重新赋权结果的影响。为了重新平衡这一重点,需要进行更多的研究,调查提高老年人对数字技术可用性的因素,并利用从定性研究中获得的叙事数据,因为它们可以提供有价值的见解。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一次考虑到探索老化的定性方法论方法的范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Working with Older People
Working with Older People Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信