Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, Oksana Polinkevych, Barbara Scozzi, Olena Kuzmak
{"title":"Smart Cities for the Sustainable Development of Local Communities: the Cases of the Volyn Region and the City of Lublin","authors":"Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, Oksana Polinkevych, Barbara Scozzi, Olena Kuzmak","doi":"10.18778/1508-2008.26.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of a “smart city” is being actively implemented by several European cities to improve citizens’ quality of life and sustainability at the local community level. The article evaluates “smart city” programs adopted by Ukraine cities in the Volyn region based on well‑being assessment. To do so, a literature review was conducted to identify indicators to assess well‑being at the local level, and Benessere equo e sostenibile dei territori (BESdT, Equitable, and Sustainable Territorial Well‑being) was adopted. BESdT is an institutional measurement framework developed by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) to measure well‑being at the local level through a collection of indicators that cover different well‑being domains. The BESdT indicators available for Ukraine and Poland were collected and then measured. The main goals of the scientific research are to clarify if it is possible to use the BESdT indicators, which are used to assess smart cities in Southern Europe, for the countries of North‑Eastern Europe using the example of the Volyn region and the city of Lublin. The work investigates the indicators of smart cities and considers examples of their construction for 2003–2021. The results testify to the upward trend in implementing “smart city” programs in the regional context. In the Volyn region, the priority areas of project implementation are security, transport, and electricity. In this region, development can be identified concerning trends such as a reduced death rate, an improved balance between work and personal life, increased economic prosperity, and the improved environmental component and security of society. On the other hand, a reduction in innovation implementation and a loss of trust in the government were also identified. The analysis shows that the positive changes above are due to the actions of the central rather than the regional government. Based on the analysis, it was established that the countries of North‑Eastern Europe have the level of development of Smart City 3.0, except for Ukraine, which has generation 1.0, and in Southern Europe, generation 4.0.","PeriodicalId":44249,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of a “smart city” is being actively implemented by several European cities to improve citizens’ quality of life and sustainability at the local community level. The article evaluates “smart city” programs adopted by Ukraine cities in the Volyn region based on well‑being assessment. To do so, a literature review was conducted to identify indicators to assess well‑being at the local level, and Benessere equo e sostenibile dei territori (BESdT, Equitable, and Sustainable Territorial Well‑being) was adopted. BESdT is an institutional measurement framework developed by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) to measure well‑being at the local level through a collection of indicators that cover different well‑being domains. The BESdT indicators available for Ukraine and Poland were collected and then measured. The main goals of the scientific research are to clarify if it is possible to use the BESdT indicators, which are used to assess smart cities in Southern Europe, for the countries of North‑Eastern Europe using the example of the Volyn region and the city of Lublin. The work investigates the indicators of smart cities and considers examples of their construction for 2003–2021. The results testify to the upward trend in implementing “smart city” programs in the regional context. In the Volyn region, the priority areas of project implementation are security, transport, and electricity. In this region, development can be identified concerning trends such as a reduced death rate, an improved balance between work and personal life, increased economic prosperity, and the improved environmental component and security of society. On the other hand, a reduction in innovation implementation and a loss of trust in the government were also identified. The analysis shows that the positive changes above are due to the actions of the central rather than the regional government. Based on the analysis, it was established that the countries of North‑Eastern Europe have the level of development of Smart City 3.0, except for Ukraine, which has generation 1.0, and in Southern Europe, generation 4.0.
一些欧洲城市正在积极实施“智慧城市”的概念,以提高当地社区居民的生活质量和可持续性。本文基于福祉评估对乌克兰沃林地区城市采用的“智慧城市”项目进行了评估。为此,进行了文献综述,以确定评估地方一级福祉的指标,并采用了Benessere equo e sostenibile dei territori (BESdT,公平和可持续领土福祉)。BESdT是意大利国家统计局(ISTAT)制定的一个制度性衡量框架,通过涵盖不同福祉领域的一系列指标,在地方一级衡量福祉。收集并测量了乌克兰和波兰可用的best dt指标。科学研究的主要目标是澄清是否有可能使用BESdT指标,该指标用于评估南欧的智能城市,以沃尔林地区和卢布林市为例,用于北欧国家。这项工作调查了智慧城市的指标,并考虑了2003-2021年智慧城市建设的例子。结果证明了在区域范围内实施“智慧城市”计划的上升趋势。在沃林地区,项目实施的优先领域是安全、交通和电力。在本区域,可以确定的发展趋势包括死亡率降低、工作和个人生活之间的平衡得到改善、经济更加繁荣、社会环境组成部分和安全得到改善。另一方面,创新实施的减少和对政府的信任的丧失也被发现。分析表明,上述积极变化是由于中央政府的行动,而不是地方政府的行动。基于分析,确定除乌克兰为1.0代外,东北欧国家为3.0代,南欧为4.0代,其余国家为3.0代。