Comparative success of two sampling techniques for high-altitude Alpine grassland reptiles under different temporal designs

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY
Michele Chiacchio, Daniele Pellitteri-Rosa, Andrea Barbi, Luca Corlatti, Dennis Rödder, Klaus Henle, Annegret Grimm-Seyfarth
{"title":"Comparative success of two sampling techniques for high-altitude Alpine grassland reptiles under different temporal designs","authors":"Michele Chiacchio, Daniele Pellitteri-Rosa, Andrea Barbi, Luca Corlatti, Dennis Rödder, Klaus Henle, Annegret Grimm-Seyfarth","doi":"10.1163/15685381-bja10150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Monitoring of wildlife populations is essential for their conservation and requires a carefully chosen methodology. We compared survey effectiveness of reptiles using coverboards and visual encounter surveys in two study sites in the Italian Alps with similar habitats and reptile communities. The two sites shared similar methodologies, cover boards and visual encounter surveys (VES), except for the temporal approach, with one employing a long-lasting monitoring scheme and the other operating on a much shorter time-frame. Coverboards were placed two years before the beginning of the monitoring in the first site, while they were installed only for ten days and then removed each year in the second site. Similarly, VES were spread across the whole reptile activity season (May-September) in the first site, while conducted over nine consecutive days in the second site. Although the observation rate of any species was mainly associated with its relative abundance, reptiles preferred long-established coverboards and all three species present ( Zootoca vivipara , Anguis veronensis and Vipera berus ) were found underneath them. Only Zootoca vivipara used recently installed ones. On the other hand, short-term daily visual encounter surveys led to a much higher observation rate of Z. vivipara than those spread over the entire season. Our results suggest that coverboards may provide a valuable monitoring tool for reptiles when projects are conducted over long periods. Conversely, when only short-term assessments are possible, no real difference exists between the two methods and observation rate is more influenced by the species abundance than by the chosen method.","PeriodicalId":50799,"journal":{"name":"Amphibia-Reptilia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amphibia-Reptilia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Monitoring of wildlife populations is essential for their conservation and requires a carefully chosen methodology. We compared survey effectiveness of reptiles using coverboards and visual encounter surveys in two study sites in the Italian Alps with similar habitats and reptile communities. The two sites shared similar methodologies, cover boards and visual encounter surveys (VES), except for the temporal approach, with one employing a long-lasting monitoring scheme and the other operating on a much shorter time-frame. Coverboards were placed two years before the beginning of the monitoring in the first site, while they were installed only for ten days and then removed each year in the second site. Similarly, VES were spread across the whole reptile activity season (May-September) in the first site, while conducted over nine consecutive days in the second site. Although the observation rate of any species was mainly associated with its relative abundance, reptiles preferred long-established coverboards and all three species present ( Zootoca vivipara , Anguis veronensis and Vipera berus ) were found underneath them. Only Zootoca vivipara used recently installed ones. On the other hand, short-term daily visual encounter surveys led to a much higher observation rate of Z. vivipara than those spread over the entire season. Our results suggest that coverboards may provide a valuable monitoring tool for reptiles when projects are conducted over long periods. Conversely, when only short-term assessments are possible, no real difference exists between the two methods and observation rate is more influenced by the species abundance than by the chosen method.
不同时间设计下两种高海拔高寒草原爬行动物取样技术的比较成功
野生动物种群监测是保护野生动物的必要条件,需要谨慎选择方法。在意大利阿尔卑斯山脉两个具有相似栖息地和爬行动物群落的研究地点,我们比较了使用覆盖板和视觉接触调查的爬行动物调查效果。这两个地点采用了类似的方法、覆盖板和目视接触调查(VES),但时间方法不同,其中一个地点采用了长期监测计划,另一个地点的时间要短得多。盖板是在第一个场址监测开始前两年放置的,而在第二个场址只安装了十天,然后每年取出来。同样,在第一个地点,VES分布在整个爬行动物活动季节(5 - 9月),而在第二个地点连续进行了9天。尽管任何物种的观察率主要与其相对丰度有关,但爬行动物更喜欢建立已久的覆盖物,并且在覆盖物下发现了所有三种(活体动物、veronensis和Vipera berus)。只有Zootoca vivipara用的是最近安装的。另一方面,短期的日常视觉接触调查导致Z. vivipara的观察率远远高于整个季节的观察率。我们的研究结果表明,当项目长期进行时,覆盖板可能为爬行动物提供有价值的监测工具。相反,当只能进行短期评估时,两种方法之间不存在真正的差异,观测率受物种丰度的影响大于所选方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Amphibia-Reptilia
Amphibia-Reptilia 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Amphibia-Reptilia is a leading European multi-disciplinary journal devoted to most of the aspects of herpetology: ecology, behaviour, evolution, conservation, physiology, morphology, paleontology, genetics, and systematics. Amphibia-Reptilia publishes high quality original papers, short-notes, reviews, book reviews and news of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica (SEH). The Societas Europaea Herpteologica (SEH) website is located at: www.seh-herpetology.org.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信