Punishing Disclosure and Silencing Victims: How the California Family Law Courts Retraumatize Abused Children By Labeling Them “Alienated”

Carrie Leonetti
{"title":"Punishing Disclosure and Silencing Victims: How the California Family Law Courts Retraumatize Abused Children By Labeling Them “Alienated”","authors":"Carrie Leonetti","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.2077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article documents the California family law courts’ poor responses to children’s disclosures of child abuse and neglect, presuming that they are false, minimizing the impact of abuse on children, or engaging in wishful thinking that the abuse will simply cease even though the perpetrator has faced no accountability and taken no steps to reform. It focuses on the detrimental impacts that the pop psychology of “parental alienation” has for child safety when children’s reports of abuse are disbelieved and minimized, particularly when it combines with other fact-finding failures in the courts.","PeriodicalId":82250,"journal":{"name":"Pace law review","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.2077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article documents the California family law courts’ poor responses to children’s disclosures of child abuse and neglect, presuming that they are false, minimizing the impact of abuse on children, or engaging in wishful thinking that the abuse will simply cease even though the perpetrator has faced no accountability and taken no steps to reform. It focuses on the detrimental impacts that the pop psychology of “parental alienation” has for child safety when children’s reports of abuse are disbelieved and minimized, particularly when it combines with other fact-finding failures in the courts.
惩罚披露和沉默受害者:加州家庭法院如何通过给受虐待儿童贴上“疏远”的标签来重新给他们造成创伤
本文记录了加州家庭法法院对儿童披露虐待和忽视儿童的不良反应,假设他们是虚假的,尽量减少虐待对儿童的影响,或者一厢情愿地认为虐待会简单地停止,即使犯罪者没有面临任何责任,也没有采取任何措施进行改革。它关注的是,当儿童的虐待报告不被相信和最小化时,特别是当它与法院的其他事实调查失败相结合时,“父母疏远”的流行心理学对儿童安全的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信