Smartphone App-Based Interventions to Support Smoking Cessation in Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review

Psych Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.3390/psych5040072
Jinsong Chen, Joanna Chu, Samantha Marsh, Tianyi Shi, Chris Bullen
{"title":"Smartphone App-Based Interventions to Support Smoking Cessation in Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jinsong Chen, Joanna Chu, Samantha Marsh, Tianyi Shi, Chris Bullen","doi":"10.3390/psych5040072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Despite global efforts to control tobacco use, smoking remains a leading cause of preventable diseases, mortality, and disparities, especially among individuals with mental health conditions. Smartphone apps have emerged as cost-effective tools to aid smokers in quitting; however, their evidence-based foundation remains understudied. This research conducted two searches to identify relevant apps: one through the scientific literature and the other from app stores. Methods—The study sought apps designed to assist smokers with mental health conditions in quitting. Searches were conducted in the scientific literature and major app stores. The apps found were evaluated for their basis in theory, features, and claimed effectiveness. Usage and rating scores were compared. Results—Among 23 apps found from app store search, only 10 (43%) were evidence-based and none had explicit reference to theory, while all apps identified in the literature were developed by applying theory. However, app store apps had significantly higher user numbers and ratings than those identified in the literature (mean rating 4.7 out of 5.0). Conclusion—Smokers with mental health conditions have limited support from currently available smoking cessation apps. Apps identified in the scientific literature lack sufficient use and longevity. Sustained support beyond research projects is crucial for enabling theoretically informed evidence-based apps to be available for people with mental health conditions, as is greater collaboration between developers and researchers to create apps that engage with end-user design.","PeriodicalId":93139,"journal":{"name":"Psych","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5040072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background—Despite global efforts to control tobacco use, smoking remains a leading cause of preventable diseases, mortality, and disparities, especially among individuals with mental health conditions. Smartphone apps have emerged as cost-effective tools to aid smokers in quitting; however, their evidence-based foundation remains understudied. This research conducted two searches to identify relevant apps: one through the scientific literature and the other from app stores. Methods—The study sought apps designed to assist smokers with mental health conditions in quitting. Searches were conducted in the scientific literature and major app stores. The apps found were evaluated for their basis in theory, features, and claimed effectiveness. Usage and rating scores were compared. Results—Among 23 apps found from app store search, only 10 (43%) were evidence-based and none had explicit reference to theory, while all apps identified in the literature were developed by applying theory. However, app store apps had significantly higher user numbers and ratings than those identified in the literature (mean rating 4.7 out of 5.0). Conclusion—Smokers with mental health conditions have limited support from currently available smoking cessation apps. Apps identified in the scientific literature lack sufficient use and longevity. Sustained support beyond research projects is crucial for enabling theoretically informed evidence-based apps to be available for people with mental health conditions, as is greater collaboration between developers and researchers to create apps that engage with end-user design.
基于智能手机应用程序的干预措施支持有精神健康状况的吸烟者戒烟:系统综述
背景:尽管全球努力控制烟草使用,但吸烟仍然是可预防疾病、死亡率和差异的主要原因,特别是在有精神健康状况的个人中。智能手机应用已经成为帮助吸烟者戒烟的经济有效的工具;然而,它们的证据基础仍未得到充分研究。这项研究进行了两种搜索来识别相关的应用程序:一种是通过科学文献,另一种是通过应用程序商店。方法:研究寻找旨在帮助有心理健康问题的吸烟者戒烟的应用程序。在科学文献和主要应用商店中进行了搜索。对这些应用程序的理论基础、功能和声称的有效性进行了评估。比较了使用和评分得分。结果:在应用商店搜索到的23个应用程序中,只有10个(43%)是基于证据的,没有一个明确参考理论,而文献中确定的所有应用程序都是通过应用理论开发的。然而,应用商店应用的用户数量和评分明显高于文献中的应用(平均评分4.7分,满分5.0分)。结论:目前可用的戒烟应用程序对有精神健康问题的吸烟者的支持有限。在科学文献中发现的应用程序缺乏足够的使用和使用寿命。研究项目之外的持续支持对于使有理论依据的基于证据的应用程序能够为有精神健康状况的人提供至关重要,开发人员和研究人员之间加强合作,创造与最终用户设计相结合的应用程序也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信