Editor’s Note

Michelle Liu Carriger
{"title":"Editor’s Note","authors":"Michelle Liu Carriger","doi":"10.1353/dtc.2023.a912003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor’s Note Michelle Liu Carriger, PhD This issue is late. It’s late because a journal like Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism relies on the time and labor of innumerable people, none of whom have the journal as their first and only priority. A peer-reviewed journal in the academic arts and humanities is a labor, if not exactly of love, then certainly of some other ill-defined at-least-partially-emotional impetus. And it seems to me that late-late capitalist society is in the midst of a reckoning of that affective relation between occupation and avocation. This reckoning is hitting hard at the places where Arts and Entertainment overlap with commerce overlap with education. Which is to say, Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism’s primary field of study and its own site of publication. This journal issue started during a media blitz about burnout, “Quiet Quitting,” and “Working to Contract” (in the aftermath of, at my institution, the largest strike of graduate student and postdoc labor in U.S. history), then spread over “Hot Labor Summer” 2023.1 First we struggled to find enough articles, then we struggled mightily to find enough peer reviewers, then many of our authors struggled to find time to complete revisions. Meanwhile, I and my managing editor(s) continued our own full time jobs of researching, writing, publishing, job marketing, teaching and keeping departments at two land grant R1 universities afloat. Indeed, a vast ill-defined proportion of the work and atmosphere of academia (and theatre/performance) exists between the distant shores of clearly defined paid duties, volunteer “service to the field” said to enhance the doer’s profile in vague-but-important ways, and the complexities of “labors of love.” Today, the CV-line appeal for free labor has worn thin, the love within the labor of both theatre and academic research, and spare bandwidth beyond the rigors of the job all seem to be running out. I haven’t been long enough in academia to feel confident this isn’t just how it always feels to reach “mid-career,” but certainly the stridency of the calls to “self-care” by saying no, the proportion of colleagues citing burnout, and the aforementioned struggle to get anything done at this volunteer-run journal seem to constitute a specific moment of crisis for the volunteer model that Theatre and Performance Studies academia runs on. And I haven’t even broached the hand-wringing ink spilled over the 2023 state of theatre production, in academia, community, and professional capacities. This long preamble to introducing the actual contents of the issue is meant to also point out that the three articles and nine book reviews we see here were completed in heroic conditions. They also represent authors across the globe with longer and shorter periods of editorial gestation. Marlon Ariyasinghe’s article provides the beginning of new discussions regarding blackface performance by presenting a case study and some historical background from Sri Lanka. The article grapples with the thorny question of how to apply the specifics of the historical [End Page 1] legacy of United States-founded, but globally traveled, blackface minstrelsy in the face of many more political and social factors. Ira Avneri’s article “A Philosopher at the Door” uses three instances of dramatized philosophical threshold-crossing to illustrate “philosophy’s unavoidable affinity with theatre.” And finally in the issue, William Woodard Lewis goes “undercover” to uncover the power of algorithmically influenced political attitudes in Blast Theory’s participatory performance piece “Operation Black Antler.” Added to the nine book reviews that have been patiently waiting for enough articles for this issue to go to print, I hope you will feel that some things are worth waiting for. And meanwhile, I invite your active participation in not just the many volunteer labors that keep the profession afloat but also in the challenge to remake the discipline in more vibrant, equitable, and sustainable ways. [End Page 2] Michelle Liu Carriger Chair and Associate Professor Department of Theater UCLA Footnotes 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/what-is-quiet-quitting-burnout-at-work/671413/ Copyright © 2023 Michelle Liu Carriger","PeriodicalId":488979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dramatic theory and criticism","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dramatic theory and criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2023.a912003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Editor’s Note Michelle Liu Carriger, PhD This issue is late. It’s late because a journal like Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism relies on the time and labor of innumerable people, none of whom have the journal as their first and only priority. A peer-reviewed journal in the academic arts and humanities is a labor, if not exactly of love, then certainly of some other ill-defined at-least-partially-emotional impetus. And it seems to me that late-late capitalist society is in the midst of a reckoning of that affective relation between occupation and avocation. This reckoning is hitting hard at the places where Arts and Entertainment overlap with commerce overlap with education. Which is to say, Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism’s primary field of study and its own site of publication. This journal issue started during a media blitz about burnout, “Quiet Quitting,” and “Working to Contract” (in the aftermath of, at my institution, the largest strike of graduate student and postdoc labor in U.S. history), then spread over “Hot Labor Summer” 2023.1 First we struggled to find enough articles, then we struggled mightily to find enough peer reviewers, then many of our authors struggled to find time to complete revisions. Meanwhile, I and my managing editor(s) continued our own full time jobs of researching, writing, publishing, job marketing, teaching and keeping departments at two land grant R1 universities afloat. Indeed, a vast ill-defined proportion of the work and atmosphere of academia (and theatre/performance) exists between the distant shores of clearly defined paid duties, volunteer “service to the field” said to enhance the doer’s profile in vague-but-important ways, and the complexities of “labors of love.” Today, the CV-line appeal for free labor has worn thin, the love within the labor of both theatre and academic research, and spare bandwidth beyond the rigors of the job all seem to be running out. I haven’t been long enough in academia to feel confident this isn’t just how it always feels to reach “mid-career,” but certainly the stridency of the calls to “self-care” by saying no, the proportion of colleagues citing burnout, and the aforementioned struggle to get anything done at this volunteer-run journal seem to constitute a specific moment of crisis for the volunteer model that Theatre and Performance Studies academia runs on. And I haven’t even broached the hand-wringing ink spilled over the 2023 state of theatre production, in academia, community, and professional capacities. This long preamble to introducing the actual contents of the issue is meant to also point out that the three articles and nine book reviews we see here were completed in heroic conditions. They also represent authors across the globe with longer and shorter periods of editorial gestation. Marlon Ariyasinghe’s article provides the beginning of new discussions regarding blackface performance by presenting a case study and some historical background from Sri Lanka. The article grapples with the thorny question of how to apply the specifics of the historical [End Page 1] legacy of United States-founded, but globally traveled, blackface minstrelsy in the face of many more political and social factors. Ira Avneri’s article “A Philosopher at the Door” uses three instances of dramatized philosophical threshold-crossing to illustrate “philosophy’s unavoidable affinity with theatre.” And finally in the issue, William Woodard Lewis goes “undercover” to uncover the power of algorithmically influenced political attitudes in Blast Theory’s participatory performance piece “Operation Black Antler.” Added to the nine book reviews that have been patiently waiting for enough articles for this issue to go to print, I hope you will feel that some things are worth waiting for. And meanwhile, I invite your active participation in not just the many volunteer labors that keep the profession afloat but also in the challenge to remake the discipline in more vibrant, equitable, and sustainable ways. [End Page 2] Michelle Liu Carriger Chair and Associate Professor Department of Theater UCLA Footnotes 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/what-is-quiet-quitting-burnout-at-work/671413/ Copyright © 2023 Michelle Liu Carriger
Editor’s音符
编者按米歇尔·刘·卡里格博士这期已经晚了。之所以姗姗来迟,是因为像《戏剧理论与批评杂志》这样的期刊依赖于无数人的时间和劳动,而没有一个人把这本杂志作为他们的第一和唯一的优先事项。学术艺术和人文领域的同行评议期刊是一种劳动,如果不完全是出于爱,那么肯定是其他一些不明确的,至少部分是情感的动力。在我看来,晚期资本主义社会正处于对职业和业余爱好之间情感关系的清算之中。这种清算对艺术和娱乐与商业和教育重叠的地方造成了沉重打击。也就是说,《戏剧理论与批评杂志》的主要研究领域和自己的出版地点。这期杂志开始于一场关于职业倦怠的媒体闪电战,“安静辞职”和“工作合同”(在我所在的机构,美国历史上最大的研究生和博士后劳工罢工之后),然后蔓延到2023.1年的“劳动热夏”,首先我们努力寻找足够的文章,然后我们努力寻找足够的同行评议人,然后我们的许多作者努力争取时间来完成修改。与此同时,我和我的总编辑们继续着我们自己的全职工作:研究、写作、出版、就业营销、教学,并维持两所获得土地资助的大学的院系的运转。事实上,学术界(和戏剧/表演)的工作和氛围中,有很大一部分是不明确的,存在于明确定义的有偿义务的遥远彼岸,志愿“服务于该领域”,据说以模糊但重要的方式提高实干家的形象,以及“爱的劳动”的复杂性。如今,简历对免费劳动力的吸引力已经逐渐减弱,对戏剧和学术研究工作的热爱,以及工作严谨之外的空闲带宽似乎都在耗尽。我在学术界工作的时间还不够长,无法确信这不仅仅是达到“职业中期”的感觉,但肯定的是,通过说“不”来“自我照顾”的声音,同事们认为精疲力竭的比例,以及前面提到的在这个志愿者经营的杂志上做任何事情的努力,似乎构成了戏剧和表演研究学术界的志愿者模式的特定危机时刻。我甚至还没有谈到2023年学术界、社区和专业能力的戏剧生产状况。这篇介绍本期实际内容的长篇序言也意在指出,我们在这里看到的三篇文章和九篇书评都是在英雄的条件下完成的。他们还代表了全球各地的作者,他们的编辑孕育期或长或短。Marlon Ariyasinghe的文章以个案研究和斯里兰卡的一些历史背景,开启了有关黑脸表演的新讨论。这篇文章探讨了一个棘手的问题,即如何在面对更多的政治和社会因素时,运用美国创立、但在全球传播的黑脸吟游诗人的历史遗产的具体内容。Ira Avneri的文章“门口的哲学家”用了三个戏剧化的哲学门槛的例子来说明“哲学与戏剧不可避免的亲密关系”。最后,威廉·伍德德·刘易斯(William Woodard Lewis)在爆破理论(Blast Theory)的参与性表演作品“黑鹿角行动”(Operation Black Antler)中“卧底”,揭示了算法影响政治态度的力量。再加上有九篇书评一直在耐心地等待这期杂志的足够文章付印,我希望你会觉得有些事情值得等待。与此同时,我邀请你们积极参与,不仅要参与许多维持这个专业的志愿工作,还要积极参与以更有活力、更公平和更可持续的方式重塑这个学科的挑战。[End Page 2] Michelle Liu Carriger加州大学洛杉矶分校戏剧系讲席兼副教授https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/what-is-quiet-quitting-burnout-at-work/671413/版权所有©2023 Michelle Liu Carriger
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信