Circus and the Avant-Gardes ed. by Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand (review)

Dave Peterson
{"title":"Circus and the Avant-Gardes ed. by Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand (review)","authors":"Dave Peterson","doi":"10.1353/dtc.2023.a912015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Circus and the Avant-Gardes ed. by Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand Dave Peterson Circus and the Avant-Gardes. Edited by Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand. Routledge, 2022. Hardcover $128.00, E-book $39.16. 284 pages. 27 illustrations. Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand’s Circus and the Avant-Gardes consists of fourteen essays by sixteen authors, most using focused case studies to center the relationship between European and Russian circus and the avant-garde. The essays explore not just how circus served to inspire avant-garde movements of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries but also how the lens of circus can challenge presumptions about the avant-garde, both as a historical set of movements and as an ongoing spur of change in the world of performance. The book is invested in how the relationship between circus and avant-garde has long been a two-way street, with theatrical forms drawing inspiration from circus, and circus then absorbing and reworking many of these innovations to its own ends. The book is divided into five groups of essays. Part 1 focuses on circus and its relation to a variety of early avant-garde movements in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Part 2 examines performances in the nineteenth century and in the first half of the twentieth century, centering ways that the intersection of circus, popular entertainments, and avant-garde destabilize traditional hierarchies and artistic borders. Part 3 explores the influence of circus and avant-garde on the emergence of film in the early twentieth century. Part 4 focuses on contemporary performances, both live and filmed, and how they reenvision or use avant-gardeand circus-inspired materials from the past. Part 5 explores how circuses have changed in the latter half of the twentieth century and beyond, often incorporating ideas from the avant-garde or from other artistic movements. Taken together, the diverse essays interrogate the ways in which circus has been used by innovative art forms, while also using circus as a lens through which to challenge avant-garde presumptions of innovation and high art. Many of the essays in Circus and the Avant-Gardes work to reframe the narrative around the workings and cultural importance of circus. In part 1, Hildbrand challenges the notion that early circus was largely without narrative through a close analysis of nineteenth-century circus practices. Hildbrand links the rise of narrative in circus, through forms such as pantomime, to the increasingly literary nature of the theatre. In doing so, she challenges the presumption that circus primarily offered the avant-garde nonnarrative models of performance, and thus reaffirms circus’s potential as an experimental site in non-literary performance. Her essay also provides details on early circus performance content, an under-documented area of circus studies. In part 2, Martyn Jolly positions a collection of novelty acts performed in mid-nineteenth-century Australia as tools for understanding the colonial settler worldview but also as sites that destabilize views of urban colonial capitals and avant-garde innovations as centers in the modern colonial [End Page 93] world. Instead, acts or apparatus were changed or altered at the colonial site, so that, “however fleetingly, ‘the new’ was actively produced, as well as passively consumed” (110). Jolly concludes that “most scholars of the avant-garde still tacitly accept this topos, obsessed with the one-sided ‘cutting edge’ rather than the two-sided ‘border’” (110). These essays and others add insight into early circus and variety performances, while reframing traditional relationships between circus, avant-garde, and modernity. Essays in Circus and the Avant-Gardes also work to expand the definition of avant-garde and broaden what the term can mean. In part 3, Kristian Moen argues that early film animation, including Alexander Calder’s miniature circus, owed more to avant-garde and circus practice than to traditional theatrical narrative, stating that early animated “films share the aesthetic approaches associated with avant-garde art, including qualities of subversion, resistance, playfulness and liveliness” (139). Similarly, in part 4, Claire Warden seeks to expand the term avant-garde in more popular directions while also using circus as an apt frame for...","PeriodicalId":488979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dramatic theory and criticism","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dramatic theory and criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2023.a912015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Circus and the Avant-Gardes ed. by Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand Dave Peterson Circus and the Avant-Gardes. Edited by Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand. Routledge, 2022. Hardcover $128.00, E-book $39.16. 284 pages. 27 illustrations. Ann-Sophie Jürgens and Mirjam Hildbrand’s Circus and the Avant-Gardes consists of fourteen essays by sixteen authors, most using focused case studies to center the relationship between European and Russian circus and the avant-garde. The essays explore not just how circus served to inspire avant-garde movements of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries but also how the lens of circus can challenge presumptions about the avant-garde, both as a historical set of movements and as an ongoing spur of change in the world of performance. The book is invested in how the relationship between circus and avant-garde has long been a two-way street, with theatrical forms drawing inspiration from circus, and circus then absorbing and reworking many of these innovations to its own ends. The book is divided into five groups of essays. Part 1 focuses on circus and its relation to a variety of early avant-garde movements in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Part 2 examines performances in the nineteenth century and in the first half of the twentieth century, centering ways that the intersection of circus, popular entertainments, and avant-garde destabilize traditional hierarchies and artistic borders. Part 3 explores the influence of circus and avant-garde on the emergence of film in the early twentieth century. Part 4 focuses on contemporary performances, both live and filmed, and how they reenvision or use avant-gardeand circus-inspired materials from the past. Part 5 explores how circuses have changed in the latter half of the twentieth century and beyond, often incorporating ideas from the avant-garde or from other artistic movements. Taken together, the diverse essays interrogate the ways in which circus has been used by innovative art forms, while also using circus as a lens through which to challenge avant-garde presumptions of innovation and high art. Many of the essays in Circus and the Avant-Gardes work to reframe the narrative around the workings and cultural importance of circus. In part 1, Hildbrand challenges the notion that early circus was largely without narrative through a close analysis of nineteenth-century circus practices. Hildbrand links the rise of narrative in circus, through forms such as pantomime, to the increasingly literary nature of the theatre. In doing so, she challenges the presumption that circus primarily offered the avant-garde nonnarrative models of performance, and thus reaffirms circus’s potential as an experimental site in non-literary performance. Her essay also provides details on early circus performance content, an under-documented area of circus studies. In part 2, Martyn Jolly positions a collection of novelty acts performed in mid-nineteenth-century Australia as tools for understanding the colonial settler worldview but also as sites that destabilize views of urban colonial capitals and avant-garde innovations as centers in the modern colonial [End Page 93] world. Instead, acts or apparatus were changed or altered at the colonial site, so that, “however fleetingly, ‘the new’ was actively produced, as well as passively consumed” (110). Jolly concludes that “most scholars of the avant-garde still tacitly accept this topos, obsessed with the one-sided ‘cutting edge’ rather than the two-sided ‘border’” (110). These essays and others add insight into early circus and variety performances, while reframing traditional relationships between circus, avant-garde, and modernity. Essays in Circus and the Avant-Gardes also work to expand the definition of avant-garde and broaden what the term can mean. In part 3, Kristian Moen argues that early film animation, including Alexander Calder’s miniature circus, owed more to avant-garde and circus practice than to traditional theatrical narrative, stating that early animated “films share the aesthetic approaches associated with avant-garde art, including qualities of subversion, resistance, playfulness and liveliness” (139). Similarly, in part 4, Claire Warden seeks to expand the term avant-garde in more popular directions while also using circus as an apt frame for...
《马戏团与先锋派》,安-索菲·约尔根斯、米里亚姆·希尔德布兰德主编(评论)
评论:马戏团和先锋派,由安-索菲·jrgens和Mirjam Hildbrand主编,戴夫·彼得森马戏团和先锋派。编辑:Ann-Sophie jrgens和Mirjam Hildbrand。劳特利奇,2022年。精装本128.00美元,电子书39.16美元。284页。27个插图。Ann-Sophie jrgens和Mirjam Hildbrand的《马戏团与先锋派》由16位作者的14篇文章组成,其中大多数使用集中的案例研究来集中欧洲和俄罗斯马戏团与先锋派之间的关系。这些文章不仅探讨了马戏如何启发了19世纪末和20世纪初的前卫运动,还探讨了马戏的镜头如何挑战先锋派的假设,无论是作为一组历史运动还是作为表演世界变革的持续刺激。这本书是如何投资马戏团和前卫之间的关系长期以来是双向的,戏剧形式从马戏中汲取灵感,然后马戏吸收和改造了许多这些创新,以达到自己的目的。这本书分为五组散文。第一部分着重于马戏及其与19世纪末和20世纪初各种早期前卫运动的关系。第二部分考察了19世纪和20世纪上半叶的表演,以马戏团、流行娱乐和前卫艺术的交汇方式为中心,打破了传统的等级制度和艺术界限。第三部分探讨了马戏团和先锋派对二十世纪初电影出现的影响。第四部分着重于当代表演,包括现场和电影,以及他们如何重新构想或使用来自过去的先锋派和马戏团灵感的材料。第五部分探讨了马戏团在二十世纪下半叶及以后是如何变化的,经常结合先锋派或其他艺术运动的思想。综合起来,这些不同的文章探讨了马戏被创新艺术形式所使用的方式,同时也用马戏作为一个镜头,通过它来挑战前卫的创新和高级艺术的假设。《马戏》和《先锋派》中的许多文章都围绕马戏的运作和文化重要性重新构建了叙述。在第一部分中,希尔德布兰德通过对19世纪马戏团实践的仔细分析,挑战了早期马戏团在很大程度上没有叙事的观念。希尔德布兰德通过哑剧等形式将马戏团叙事的兴起与戏剧日益增长的文学性联系起来。在此过程中,她挑战了马戏主要提供前卫的非叙事表演模式的假设,从而重申了马戏作为非文学表演实验场所的潜力。她的文章还提供了早期马戏表演内容的细节,马戏研究的一个记录不足的领域。在第二部分中,Martyn Jolly将19世纪中期澳大利亚的一系列新奇表演定位为理解殖民定居者世界观的工具,同时也将其定位为动摇城市殖民首都观点的场所,以及作为现代殖民世界中心的前卫创新。相反,行为或设备在殖民地地点被改变或改变,因此,“无论多么短暂,‘新’都是主动生产的,也是被动消费的”(110)。乔利的结论是,“大多数先锋派学者仍然默认这个主题,痴迷于片面的‘前沿’而不是双面的‘边界’”(110)。这些文章和其他文章增加了对早期马戏和杂耍表演的见解,同时重新构建了马戏,前卫和现代之间的传统关系。《马戏团》和《先锋派》中的文章也致力于扩展先锋派的定义,拓宽这个术语的含义。在第三部分中,克里斯蒂安·莫恩认为,早期的电影动画,包括亚历山大·考尔德的微型马戏团,更多地归功于前卫和马戏团的实践,而不是传统的戏剧叙事,他指出,早期的动画“电影分享了与前卫艺术相关的美学方法,包括颠覆、抵抗、游戏和活泼的品质”(139)。同样,在第4部分中,Claire Warden试图将“前卫”一词扩展到更流行的方向,同时也将“马戏团”作为一个合适的框架……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信