The people’s budget? How business interests and fiscal constraints shaped the economic policies of the Italian populist government

Gemma Gasseau, Vincenzo Maccarrone
{"title":"The people’s budget? How business interests and fiscal constraints shaped the economic policies of the Italian populist government","authors":"Gemma Gasseau, Vincenzo Maccarrone","doi":"10.1332/26352257y2023d000000002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between June 2018 and September 2019, Italy was ruled by a coalition government comprising the far-right League and the anti-establishment Five Star Movement. The government, which was widely referred to as the first populist executive in a major EU member state, alarmed Italian and European elites. In fact, the coalition built its rhetoric on questioning EU legislation, particularly that concerning immigration and, of interest here, fiscal constraints and austerity policies. The executive’s first programmatic document on economic policy, the budgetary plan for 2019, triggered two months of heated negotiations with the European Commission before being approved. Although critical political economists have investigated how the ‘populist’ government furthered neoliberalism in Italy, an analysis of its organic ties with Italian capital is still missing. Our article addresses this gap by investigating, within a critical Global Political Economy perspective, the competing business interests behind the budgetary plan and how they shaped the formulation of the populist government’s economic policies. The analysis of the executive’s economic policies, together with its organic ties with capital, allows us to explain the rise of the populist government and describe its nature as well as its contradictions which explain its limited transformative potential and its inner fragility. The findings highlight the relevance of a critical Global Political Economy perspective for investigating economic and fiscal policy in the era of authoritarian neoliberalism, in particular in assessing the EU structural constraints on economic and fiscal policy but also the agency of domestic capital shaping it.","PeriodicalId":302702,"journal":{"name":"Global Political Economy","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/26352257y2023d000000002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between June 2018 and September 2019, Italy was ruled by a coalition government comprising the far-right League and the anti-establishment Five Star Movement. The government, which was widely referred to as the first populist executive in a major EU member state, alarmed Italian and European elites. In fact, the coalition built its rhetoric on questioning EU legislation, particularly that concerning immigration and, of interest here, fiscal constraints and austerity policies. The executive’s first programmatic document on economic policy, the budgetary plan for 2019, triggered two months of heated negotiations with the European Commission before being approved. Although critical political economists have investigated how the ‘populist’ government furthered neoliberalism in Italy, an analysis of its organic ties with Italian capital is still missing. Our article addresses this gap by investigating, within a critical Global Political Economy perspective, the competing business interests behind the budgetary plan and how they shaped the formulation of the populist government’s economic policies. The analysis of the executive’s economic policies, together with its organic ties with capital, allows us to explain the rise of the populist government and describe its nature as well as its contradictions which explain its limited transformative potential and its inner fragility. The findings highlight the relevance of a critical Global Political Economy perspective for investigating economic and fiscal policy in the era of authoritarian neoliberalism, in particular in assessing the EU structural constraints on economic and fiscal policy but also the agency of domestic capital shaping it.
人民的预算?商业利益和财政约束是如何影响意大利民粹主义政府的经济政策的
2018年6月至2019年9月,意大利由极右翼联盟党和反建制的五星运动组成的联合政府执政。意大利政府被广泛认为是欧盟主要成员国中第一个民粹主义政府,这令意大利和欧洲的精英们感到震惊。事实上,联合政府的言论建立在质疑欧盟立法的基础上,尤其是有关移民的立法,以及这里感兴趣的财政约束和紧缩政策。这位高管的第一份经济政策纲领性文件是2019年的预算计划,在获得批准之前与欧盟委员会(European Commission)进行了两个月的激烈谈判。尽管批判性的政治经济学家已经研究了“民粹主义”政府如何在意大利推进新自由主义,但对其与意大利资本有机联系的分析仍然缺失。我们的文章通过从全球政治经济学的角度调查预算计划背后相互竞争的商业利益,以及它们如何影响民粹主义政府经济政策的制定,来解决这一差距。对行政部门经济政策的分析,连同其与资本的有机联系,使我们能够解释民粹主义政府的兴起,并描述其性质及其矛盾,从而解释其有限的变革潜力和内在的脆弱性。研究结果强调了在威权新自由主义时代调查经济和财政政策的关键全球政治经济学视角的相关性,特别是在评估欧盟对经济和财政政策的结构性限制以及国内资本塑造政策的机构方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信