Economic Unrest and Investment Perspective on Liquidity in relation to the Investor Sentiments

Jawad Saleemi
{"title":"Economic Unrest and Investment Perspective on Liquidity in relation to the Investor Sentiments","authors":"Jawad Saleemi","doi":"10.58567/fel02020005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Liquidity and its associated issues are one of dominant strands in the market microstructure. In this study, microblogging-based behavioral perspective on economic unrest is linked to the market liquidity. The concept of liquidity is examined in terms of price dispersion relative to the quantity traded. The analysis contains the quantification of multiple linear regression, Gaussian distribution technique, and vector error correction methodology. In the economic stability period, the investor&amp;rsquo;s mood, either in positive manner or pessimistic context, had an influential role on the price impact volume-based liquidity. Meantime, the probability was higher for occurrence of price impact volume-based liquidity in response to the sentiment indicators. In the economic unrest environments, the positive bias investor&amp;rsquo;s mood was not vigorous enough to influence the dispersion of asset&amp;rsquo;s prices and trading quantity. Most importantly, the negative bias investor&amp;rsquo;s emotion was linked to increase the dispersion of asset&amp;rsquo;s prices relative to the quantity traded. Investors with a lower amount of trading quantity had declined the liquidity in the market. Additionally, there was a higher probability for occurrence of illiquidity in the pessimistic market periods. However, changes in past sentiment series were not associated with changes in pervious liquidity series, either in short run or long run. The findings may be potentially applicable to manage the behavioral perspective of liquidity risk.</span></p>","PeriodicalId":262077,"journal":{"name":"Financial Economics Letters","volume":" 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58567/fel02020005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liquidity and its associated issues are one of dominant strands in the market microstructure. In this study, microblogging-based behavioral perspective on economic unrest is linked to the market liquidity. The concept of liquidity is examined in terms of price dispersion relative to the quantity traded. The analysis contains the quantification of multiple linear regression, Gaussian distribution technique, and vector error correction methodology. In the economic stability period, the investor&rsquo;s mood, either in positive manner or pessimistic context, had an influential role on the price impact volume-based liquidity. Meantime, the probability was higher for occurrence of price impact volume-based liquidity in response to the sentiment indicators. In the economic unrest environments, the positive bias investor&rsquo;s mood was not vigorous enough to influence the dispersion of asset&rsquo;s prices and trading quantity. Most importantly, the negative bias investor&rsquo;s emotion was linked to increase the dispersion of asset&rsquo;s prices relative to the quantity traded. Investors with a lower amount of trading quantity had declined the liquidity in the market. Additionally, there was a higher probability for occurrence of illiquidity in the pessimistic market periods. However, changes in past sentiment series were not associated with changes in pervious liquidity series, either in short run or long run. The findings may be potentially applicable to manage the behavioral perspective of liquidity risk.

经济动荡和投资视角下的流动性与投资者情绪
p class=" font - family:宋体;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">流动性及其相关问题是市场微观结构中的主要问题之一。在本研究中,基于微博的行为视角将经济动荡与市场流动性联系起来。流动性的概念是根据相对于交易数量的价格分散来检验的。分析包括多元线性回归的量化、高斯分布技术和矢量误差校正方法。在经济稳定时期,投资者的情绪,无论是积极的还是悲观的,都对价格影响量的流动性有影响作用。同时,在情绪指标的影响下,出现价格影响交易量流动性的概率更高。在经济动荡的环境下,积极偏向投资者的情绪不足以影响资产价格和交易量的分散。最重要的是,投资者的负面偏见情绪与资产价格相对于交易量的分散性增加有关。交易量较小的投资者降低了市场的流动性。此外,在悲观的市场时期,出现流动性不足的可能性更高。然而,无论是短期还是长期,过去情绪序列的变化与过去流动性序列的变化都不相关。研究结果可能潜在地适用于管理流动性风险的行为视角。</span></p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信