'Traumatomic' Encounters. Trauma through Radioactivity in Photofilmic 'Experimental Documents' of Chernobyl

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Iluminace Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.58193/ilu.1760
Beja Margitházi
{"title":"'Traumatomic' Encounters. Trauma through Radioactivity in Photofilmic 'Experimental Documents' of Chernobyl","authors":"Beja Margitházi","doi":"10.58193/ilu.1760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nuclear trauma has always resisted verbal and visual portrayal, calling for various alternative, form-breaking methods. This article discusses three artistic works which I consider “experimental documents” because of their various photographic and filmic practices of intimately approaching the radioactive contamination still present in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. The site-related projects of Alice Miceli (Chernobyl Project, 2006–2010), Lina Selander (Lenin’s Lamp Glows in the Peasant’s Hut, 2011), and Daniel McIntyre (Lion series, 2011–2014) go beyond the journalistic representations of the area and directly engage with the material traces, embodiment and objectification of immaterial radioactivity, devoting key role to the artist’s bodily and sensorial presence in the traumatic landscape. I examine these works of art in a conceptual context that assumes a structural similarity between radioactive radiation and trauma due to their uncontrollable and retrospective nature, their specific aspects of embodiment, and their manifestation through various emotional and physical symptoms. According to my observation, although the artists initially aim to investigate and document the immateriality of toxic radiation through the mediums of photography and film, they not only reveal the original, hyperobjective nature of nuclear trauma, but also touch on its affective qualities. I will argue that these three works, despite their differences, are based on “traumatomic encounters” with the radiation-contaminated sites and have in common the perception of Chernobyl as a “traumascape” (Tumarkin), which is saturated with an invisible, radioactive, and at the same time affective “atmosphere” (BĂśhme).","PeriodicalId":38309,"journal":{"name":"Iluminace","volume":" 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iluminace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58193/ilu.1760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nuclear trauma has always resisted verbal and visual portrayal, calling for various alternative, form-breaking methods. This article discusses three artistic works which I consider “experimental documents” because of their various photographic and filmic practices of intimately approaching the radioactive contamination still present in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. The site-related projects of Alice Miceli (Chernobyl Project, 2006–2010), Lina Selander (Lenin’s Lamp Glows in the Peasant’s Hut, 2011), and Daniel McIntyre (Lion series, 2011–2014) go beyond the journalistic representations of the area and directly engage with the material traces, embodiment and objectification of immaterial radioactivity, devoting key role to the artist’s bodily and sensorial presence in the traumatic landscape. I examine these works of art in a conceptual context that assumes a structural similarity between radioactive radiation and trauma due to their uncontrollable and retrospective nature, their specific aspects of embodiment, and their manifestation through various emotional and physical symptoms. According to my observation, although the artists initially aim to investigate and document the immateriality of toxic radiation through the mediums of photography and film, they not only reveal the original, hyperobjective nature of nuclear trauma, but also touch on its affective qualities. I will argue that these three works, despite their differences, are based on “traumatomic encounters” with the radiation-contaminated sites and have in common the perception of Chernobyl as a “traumascape” (Tumarkin), which is saturated with an invisible, radioactive, and at the same time affective “atmosphere” (BĂśhme).
Traumatomic相遇。切尔诺贝利照相“实验文件”中的放射性创伤
核创伤一直抵制语言和视觉的描绘,呼吁各种替代的,打破形式的方法。这篇文章讨论了三件艺术作品,我认为它们是“实验性文件”,因为它们的各种摄影和电影实践密切接近切尔诺贝利隔离区仍然存在的放射性污染。Alice Miceli(切尔诺贝利项目,2006-2010)、Lina Selander(列宁的灯在农民的小屋中发光,2011)和Daniel McIntyre(狮子系列,2011 - 2014)的现场相关项目超越了对该地区的新闻表现,直接涉及非物质放射性的物质痕迹、具体化和物化,在创伤景观中发挥了艺术家身体和感官存在的关键作用。我在一个概念的背景下研究这些艺术作品,假设放射性辐射和创伤之间具有结构上的相似性,因为它们具有不可控和回顾性的性质,它们的具体体现方面,以及它们通过各种情绪和身体症状的表现。根据我的观察,虽然艺术家们最初的目的是通过摄影和电影的媒介来调查和记录有毒辐射的非物质性,但他们不仅揭示了核创伤的原始、超客观的本质,而且触及了它的情感品质。我认为,这三部作品尽管存在差异,但都是基于与辐射污染地点的“创伤性接触”,并将切尔诺贝利视为一个“创伤景观”(图马金)的共同点,它充满了一种看不见的,放射性的,同时也是情感的“气氛”(BĂśhme)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iluminace
Iluminace Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信