Review of the Literature on the Current State of Periosteum-Mediated Craniofacial Bone Regeneration

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Eyituoyo Okoturo
{"title":"Review of the Literature on the Current State of Periosteum-Mediated Craniofacial Bone Regeneration","authors":"Eyituoyo Okoturo","doi":"10.1177/19433875231214068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Design This is an article review on the current state of periosteum-mediated bone regeneration (PMBR). It is a known mandibular reconstruction option in children, and though poorly understood and unpredictable, the concerns of developmental changes to donor and recipient tissues shared by other treatment options are nonexistent. The definitive role of periosteum during bone regeneration remains largely unknown. Objective The objective is to review the literature on the clinical and molecular mechanism evidence of this event. Methods Our search methodology was modeled after the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Search strategies were categorized into search 1 for clinical evidence of mandibular regeneration and search 2 for gene expression review for craniofacial regeneration. The quality assessment of each publication was undertaken, and inclusion criteria comprise mandibular continuity defect for search 1 and use of gene expression assay propriety kit for search 2. Results 33 studies were selected for search 1 while four studies with non-human subjects were selected for search 2. Monitoring of PMBR onset was advised at 2 weeks post-operative, and the gene expression results showed an upregulation of genes responsible for angiogenesis, cytokine activities, and immune–inflammatory response in week 1 and skeletal development and signaling pathways in week 2. Conclusions The results suggest that young periosteum has a higher probability of PMBR than adult periosteum, and skeletal morphogenesis regulated by skeletal developmental genes and pathways may characterize the gene expression patterns of PMBR.","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875231214068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Design This is an article review on the current state of periosteum-mediated bone regeneration (PMBR). It is a known mandibular reconstruction option in children, and though poorly understood and unpredictable, the concerns of developmental changes to donor and recipient tissues shared by other treatment options are nonexistent. The definitive role of periosteum during bone regeneration remains largely unknown. Objective The objective is to review the literature on the clinical and molecular mechanism evidence of this event. Methods Our search methodology was modeled after the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Search strategies were categorized into search 1 for clinical evidence of mandibular regeneration and search 2 for gene expression review for craniofacial regeneration. The quality assessment of each publication was undertaken, and inclusion criteria comprise mandibular continuity defect for search 1 and use of gene expression assay propriety kit for search 2. Results 33 studies were selected for search 1 while four studies with non-human subjects were selected for search 2. Monitoring of PMBR onset was advised at 2 weeks post-operative, and the gene expression results showed an upregulation of genes responsible for angiogenesis, cytokine activities, and immune–inflammatory response in week 1 and skeletal development and signaling pathways in week 2. Conclusions The results suggest that young periosteum has a higher probability of PMBR than adult periosteum, and skeletal morphogenesis regulated by skeletal developmental genes and pathways may characterize the gene expression patterns of PMBR.
骨膜介导颅面骨再生的文献综述
研究设计本文综述了骨膜介导骨再生(PMBR)的研究现状。这是一种已知的儿童下颌骨重建选择,尽管人们对其了解甚少且难以预测,但其他治疗方案对供体和受体组织发育变化的担忧并不存在。骨膜在骨再生中的决定性作用在很大程度上仍然未知。目的回顾有关该事件的临床和分子机制证据的文献。方法我们的搜索方法是按照PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南建模的。搜索策略分为搜索1下颌再生的临床证据和搜索2颅面再生的基因表达综述。对每份出版物进行质量评估,纳入标准包括搜索1的下颌连续性缺陷和使用基因表达测定专用试剂盒搜索2。结果检索1选择了33项研究,检索2选择了4项非人类研究。建议在术后2周监测PMBR的发生,基因表达结果显示,在第1周,负责血管生成、细胞因子活性和免疫炎症反应的基因上调,在第2周,负责骨骼发育和信号通路的基因上调。结论幼龄骨膜发生PMBR的概率高于成年骨膜,骨骼发育基因和途径调控的骨骼形态发生可能是PMBR基因表达模式的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信