Differential response of three large mammal species to human recreation in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA

Madison R. Uetrecht, April Bermudez, Daniel Novoa, Jennifer Reithel, Vaneza Rodriguez, Rosemary Smith, Shannon Sprott, Morgan W. Tingley, Daniel T. Blumstein
{"title":"Differential response of three large mammal species to human recreation in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA","authors":"Madison R. Uetrecht, April Bermudez, Daniel Novoa, Jennifer Reithel, Vaneza Rodriguez, Rosemary Smith, Shannon Sprott, Morgan W. Tingley, Daniel T. Blumstein","doi":"10.3389/fcosc.2023.1234157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outdoor recreation benefits local economies, environmental education, and public health and wellbeing, but it can also adversely affect local ecosystems. Human presence in natural areas alters feeding and reproductive behaviors, physiology, and population structure in many wildlife species, often resulting in cascading effects through entire ecological communities. As outdoor recreation gains popularity, existing trails are becoming overcrowded and new trails are being built to accommodate increasing use. Many recreation impact studies have investigated effects of the presence or absence of humans while few have investigated recreation effects on wildlife using a gradient of disturbance intensity. We used camera traps to quantify trail use by humans and mid- to large-sized mammals in an area of intense outdoor recreation–the Upper East River Valley, Colorado, USA. We selected five trails with different types and intensities of human use and deployed six cameras on each trail for five weeks during a COVID-enhanced 2020 summer tourism season. We used occupancy models to estimate detectability and habitat use of the three most common mammal species in the study area and determined which human activities affect the habitat use patterns of each species. Human activities affected each species differently. Mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) tended to use areas with more vehicles, more predators, and greater distances from the trailhead, and they were more likely to be detected where there were more bikers. Coyotes ( Canis latrans ) and red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) were most likely to use areas where their prey species occurred, and foxes were more likely to be detected where the vegetation was shorter. Humans and their recreational activities differentially influence different species. More generally, these results reinforce that it is unlikely that a single management policy is suitable for all species and management should thus be tailored for each target species.","PeriodicalId":484005,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in conservation science","volume":" 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in conservation science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1234157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outdoor recreation benefits local economies, environmental education, and public health and wellbeing, but it can also adversely affect local ecosystems. Human presence in natural areas alters feeding and reproductive behaviors, physiology, and population structure in many wildlife species, often resulting in cascading effects through entire ecological communities. As outdoor recreation gains popularity, existing trails are becoming overcrowded and new trails are being built to accommodate increasing use. Many recreation impact studies have investigated effects of the presence or absence of humans while few have investigated recreation effects on wildlife using a gradient of disturbance intensity. We used camera traps to quantify trail use by humans and mid- to large-sized mammals in an area of intense outdoor recreation–the Upper East River Valley, Colorado, USA. We selected five trails with different types and intensities of human use and deployed six cameras on each trail for five weeks during a COVID-enhanced 2020 summer tourism season. We used occupancy models to estimate detectability and habitat use of the three most common mammal species in the study area and determined which human activities affect the habitat use patterns of each species. Human activities affected each species differently. Mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) tended to use areas with more vehicles, more predators, and greater distances from the trailhead, and they were more likely to be detected where there were more bikers. Coyotes ( Canis latrans ) and red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) were most likely to use areas where their prey species occurred, and foxes were more likely to be detected where the vegetation was shorter. Humans and their recreational activities differentially influence different species. More generally, these results reinforce that it is unlikely that a single management policy is suitable for all species and management should thus be tailored for each target species.
美国科罗拉多州落基山脉三种大型哺乳动物对人类娱乐活动的差异反应
户外娱乐有益于当地经济、环境教育、公众健康和福祉,但也会对当地生态系统产生不利影响。人类在自然区域的存在改变了许多野生动物的摄食和繁殖行为、生理和种群结构,往往导致整个生态群落的级联效应。随着户外娱乐活动越来越受欢迎,现有的步道变得拥挤不堪,新的步道正在建设中,以适应日益增加的使用。许多娱乐影响研究调查了人类存在或不存在的影响,而很少使用干扰强度梯度调查娱乐对野生动物的影响。在美国科罗拉多州的上东河流域,我们使用相机陷阱来量化人类和大中型哺乳动物在激烈的户外娱乐活动中使用的小径。我们选择了5条人类使用类型和强度不同的步道,并在2020年夏季旅游旺季期间在每条步道上部署了6台摄像机,为期5周。利用占用模型估算了研究区三种最常见哺乳动物的可探测性和栖息地利用情况,并确定了人类活动对每种哺乳动物栖息地利用模式的影响。人类活动对每个物种的影响是不同的。骡鹿(Odocoileus hemionus)倾向于使用车辆较多、捕食者较多、距离小道起点较远的区域,并且在有较多骑自行车者的地方更容易被发现。土狼(Canis latrans)和红狐(Vulpes Vulpes)最有可能利用其猎物物种发生的区域,而狐狸更容易在植被较短的地方被发现。人类及其娱乐活动对不同物种的影响是不同的。更一般地说,这些结果强化了单一管理政策不太可能适用于所有物种,因此管理应针对每个目标物种进行量身定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信