Hippocampal Glutamate, Resting Perfusion and the Effects of Cannabidiol in Psychosis Risk

Cathy Davies, Matthijs G Bossong, Daniel Martins, Robin Wilson, Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi, Grace Blest-Hopley, Paul Allen, Fernando Zelaya, David J Lythgoe, Michael Brammer, Jesus Perez, Philip McGuire, Sagnik Bhattacharyya
{"title":"Hippocampal Glutamate, Resting Perfusion and the Effects of Cannabidiol in Psychosis Risk","authors":"Cathy Davies, Matthijs G Bossong, Daniel Martins, Robin Wilson, Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi, Grace Blest-Hopley, Paul Allen, Fernando Zelaya, David J Lythgoe, Michael Brammer, Jesus Perez, Philip McGuire, Sagnik Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Preclinical and human data suggest that psychosis onset involves hippocampal glutamatergic dysfunction, driving hyperactivity and hyperperfusion in a hippocampal-midbrain-striatal circuit. Whether glutamatergic dysfunction is related to cerebral perfusion in patients at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, and whether cannabidiol (CBD) has ameliorative effects on glutamate or its relationship with perfusion remains unknown. Methods Using a double-blind, parallel-group design, 33 CHR patients were randomized to a single 600 mg dose of CBD or placebo; 19 healthy controls did not receive any drug. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure glutamate concentrations in left hippocampus. We examined differences relating to CHR status (controls vs placebo), effects of CBD (placebo vs CBD), and linear between-group effects, such that placebo>CBD>controls or controls>CBD>placebo. We also examined group × glutamate × cerebral perfusion (measured using Arterial Spin Labeling) interactions. Results Compared to controls, CHR-placebo patients had significantly lower hippocampal glutamate (P =.015) and a significant linear relationship was observed across groups, such that glutamate was highest in controls, lowest in CHR-placebo, and intermediate in CHR-CBD (P =.031). Moreover, there was a significant interaction between group (controls vs CHR-placebo), hippocampal glutamate, and perfusion in the putamen and insula (PFWE =.012), with a strong positive correlation in CHR-placebo vs a negative correlation in controls. Conclusions Our findings suggest that hippocampal glutamate is lower in CHR patients and may be partially normalized by a single dose of CBD. Furthermore, we provide the first in vivo evidence of an abnormal relationship between hippocampal glutamate and perfusion in the striatum and insula in CHR.","PeriodicalId":21348,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Background Preclinical and human data suggest that psychosis onset involves hippocampal glutamatergic dysfunction, driving hyperactivity and hyperperfusion in a hippocampal-midbrain-striatal circuit. Whether glutamatergic dysfunction is related to cerebral perfusion in patients at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, and whether cannabidiol (CBD) has ameliorative effects on glutamate or its relationship with perfusion remains unknown. Methods Using a double-blind, parallel-group design, 33 CHR patients were randomized to a single 600 mg dose of CBD or placebo; 19 healthy controls did not receive any drug. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure glutamate concentrations in left hippocampus. We examined differences relating to CHR status (controls vs placebo), effects of CBD (placebo vs CBD), and linear between-group effects, such that placebo>CBD>controls or controls>CBD>placebo. We also examined group × glutamate × cerebral perfusion (measured using Arterial Spin Labeling) interactions. Results Compared to controls, CHR-placebo patients had significantly lower hippocampal glutamate (P =.015) and a significant linear relationship was observed across groups, such that glutamate was highest in controls, lowest in CHR-placebo, and intermediate in CHR-CBD (P =.031). Moreover, there was a significant interaction between group (controls vs CHR-placebo), hippocampal glutamate, and perfusion in the putamen and insula (PFWE =.012), with a strong positive correlation in CHR-placebo vs a negative correlation in controls. Conclusions Our findings suggest that hippocampal glutamate is lower in CHR patients and may be partially normalized by a single dose of CBD. Furthermore, we provide the first in vivo evidence of an abnormal relationship between hippocampal glutamate and perfusion in the striatum and insula in CHR.
海马谷氨酸、静息灌注及大麻二酚对精神病风险的影响
临床前和人类数据表明,精神病的发病涉及海马谷氨酸能功能障碍,驱动海马-中脑纹状体回路的过度活跃和高灌注。临床精神病高危(CHR)患者的谷氨酸能功能障碍是否与脑灌注有关,大麻二酚(CBD)是否对谷氨酸有改善作用或与灌注的关系尚不清楚。方法采用双盲、平行组设计,33例CHR患者随机接受单剂量600 mg CBD或安慰剂治疗;19名健康对照者未接受任何药物治疗。质子磁共振波谱法测定左海马谷氨酸浓度。我们检查了与CHR状态(对照与安慰剂)、CBD效果(安慰剂与CBD)以及组间线性效应相关的差异,例如安慰剂>CBD>对照或对照>CBD>安慰剂。我们还检查了组×谷氨酸×脑灌注(用动脉自旋标记测量)的相互作用。结果与对照组相比,cr -安慰剂组患者海马谷氨酸水平显著降低(P = 0.015),各组间存在显著的线性关系,对照组谷氨酸水平最高,cr -安慰剂组最低,cr - cbd组居中(P = 0.031)。此外,各组(对照组与cr -安慰剂组)、海马谷氨酸、壳核和脑岛灌注之间存在显著的相互作用(PFWE = 0.012), cr -安慰剂组与对照组存在强正相关,而对照组存在负相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,CHR患者的海马谷氨酸水平较低,单剂量CBD可能使其部分正常化。此外,我们首次在体内证明了CHR中海马谷氨酸与纹状体和脑岛灌注之间的异常关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信