Undergraduate students’ predilection for seating pattern and their engagement in a collaborated blended learning in the science education classroom

Q2 Social Sciences
Nja, Cecilia Obi, Erim, Costly Manyo, Eyo, Eneyo Okon, Meremikwu, Anne Ndidi, Ekon, Esther Etop
{"title":"Undergraduate students’ predilection for seating pattern and their engagement in a collaborated blended learning in the science education classroom","authors":"Nja, Cecilia Obi, Erim, Costly Manyo, Eyo, Eneyo Okon, Meremikwu, Anne Ndidi, Ekon, Esther Etop","doi":"10.18488/61.v11i4.3508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of undergraduate students’ predilection of seating pattern on their engagement and achievement in a collaborated blended learning in a science education classroom. The sample of this study constituted 120 third year science education students. This research employed a mixed method design by using qualitative and quantitative studies. Two instruments named: Student’s performance and predilection for seating pattern (SPAPFSP) and Students’ class experience with the U-shape seating pattern (SCEUSP), choice of seating pattern and why the choice were used. The Cronbach alpha reliability for the instrument ranged from 0.89 to 0.91. Results of the analysis using a 2 by three analysis of variance indicated that the students in the U-shaped classroom achieved more than those in the row-column arrangement. A paired sample t-test analysis test results reported that students preferred the U-shape seating pattern in their classrooms. The implication of this study is that the seating pattern adopted by a teacher influences the educational outcome of students. It was therefore recommended among others that the U-shape seating arrangement be used in a blended science instruction.","PeriodicalId":37226,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Practice","volume":"14 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i4.3508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of undergraduate students’ predilection of seating pattern on their engagement and achievement in a collaborated blended learning in a science education classroom. The sample of this study constituted 120 third year science education students. This research employed a mixed method design by using qualitative and quantitative studies. Two instruments named: Student’s performance and predilection for seating pattern (SPAPFSP) and Students’ class experience with the U-shape seating pattern (SCEUSP), choice of seating pattern and why the choice were used. The Cronbach alpha reliability for the instrument ranged from 0.89 to 0.91. Results of the analysis using a 2 by three analysis of variance indicated that the students in the U-shaped classroom achieved more than those in the row-column arrangement. A paired sample t-test analysis test results reported that students preferred the U-shape seating pattern in their classrooms. The implication of this study is that the seating pattern adopted by a teacher influences the educational outcome of students. It was therefore recommended among others that the U-shape seating arrangement be used in a blended science instruction.
本科学生对座位模式的偏好及其在科学教育课堂中合作混合式学习的参与
摘要本研究旨在探讨大学生座位偏好对科学教育课堂合作混合式学习的投入与成绩的影响。本研究的样本为120名理科三年级学生。本研究采用定性研究与定量研究相结合的混合方法设计。两个工具命名为:学生对座位模式的表现和偏好(SPAPFSP)和学生对u形座位模式的课堂体验(SCEUSP),座位模式的选择和为什么使用这种选择。该仪器的Cronbach α信度范围为0.89 ~ 0.91。使用2 × 3方差分析的分析结果表明,u型教室的学生比排柱教室的学生取得了更多的成绩。配对样本t检验分析结果显示,学生们更喜欢教室里的u形座位模式。本研究的意义在于,教师所采用的座位模式会影响学生的教育成果。因此,建议在混合科学教学中使用u形座位安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信