How Do Prospective Teachers Find Number Patterns Based on the Laws of Proximity, Closure, and Similarity in a Problem-Solving Activity?

Q3 Multidisciplinary
Mohammad Archi Maulyda, Sugiman Sugiman, Wuri Wuryandani, Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo
{"title":"How Do Prospective Teachers Find Number Patterns Based on the Laws of Proximity, Closure, and Similarity in a Problem-Solving Activity?","authors":"Mohammad Archi Maulyda, Sugiman Sugiman, Wuri Wuryandani, Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Number pattern is a relevant topic in mathematics. Generally, the problems related to the theme can be solved by applying three principles: proximity, closure, and similarity. Besides, solving number pattern problems is closely related to students’ ability to present the problem mathematically . Objectives : To examine prospective teachers’ mathematical problem-solving processes based on the laws of proximity, closure, and similarity . Design : This qualitative research uses a case-study approach to achieve research objectives. Setting and participants : The researcher gave ten math questions to 67 prospective teachers (university students), choosing three to participate. The three focal participants were selected based on the categorisation results using indicators of proximity, similarity, and closure approaches from Gestalt theory. Data collection and analysis : Besides the test questions, the researcher conducted cognitive interviews with the three focal participants to confirm and explore the thought processes. Researchers used focus group discussion (FGD), cross-section data, and reviews with relevant references to validate the research outcomes. Results : The data show that the students could use the law of proximity, closure, and similarity in solving the number pattern problem, which can be seen from their ability to divide the pattern into two parts, complete it into specific geometrical shapes, and to divide it into similar shapes. In this study, prospective teachers’ thinking process schemes were also found when solving patterned number problems using the law of proximity, the law of closure, and the law of similarity. Conclusions: The students who apply proximity could divide each pattern into two parts: fixed and growth. The pattern of growth difference will become the key in generating the general form of the pattern. The students who applied closure could complete the pattern into a particular shape by adding the pattern element. Furthermore, the students who applied similarity divided the pattern into similar shapes. Every student showed a good process in making representation.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Number pattern is a relevant topic in mathematics. Generally, the problems related to the theme can be solved by applying three principles: proximity, closure, and similarity. Besides, solving number pattern problems is closely related to students’ ability to present the problem mathematically . Objectives : To examine prospective teachers’ mathematical problem-solving processes based on the laws of proximity, closure, and similarity . Design : This qualitative research uses a case-study approach to achieve research objectives. Setting and participants : The researcher gave ten math questions to 67 prospective teachers (university students), choosing three to participate. The three focal participants were selected based on the categorisation results using indicators of proximity, similarity, and closure approaches from Gestalt theory. Data collection and analysis : Besides the test questions, the researcher conducted cognitive interviews with the three focal participants to confirm and explore the thought processes. Researchers used focus group discussion (FGD), cross-section data, and reviews with relevant references to validate the research outcomes. Results : The data show that the students could use the law of proximity, closure, and similarity in solving the number pattern problem, which can be seen from their ability to divide the pattern into two parts, complete it into specific geometrical shapes, and to divide it into similar shapes. In this study, prospective teachers’ thinking process schemes were also found when solving patterned number problems using the law of proximity, the law of closure, and the law of similarity. Conclusions: The students who apply proximity could divide each pattern into two parts: fixed and growth. The pattern of growth difference will become the key in generating the general form of the pattern. The students who applied closure could complete the pattern into a particular shape by adding the pattern element. Furthermore, the students who applied similarity divided the pattern into similar shapes. Every student showed a good process in making representation.
在问题解决活动中,准教师如何根据接近性、封闭性和相似性法则找到数字模式?
背景:数字模式是数学中的一个相关课题。一般来说,与主题相关的问题可以通过应用三个原则来解决:接近性、封闭性和相似性。此外,解决数字模式问题与学生用数学表达问题的能力密切相关。目的:考察准教师基于接近性、封闭性和相似性法则的数学问题解决过程。设计:本定性研究采用案例研究的方法来实现研究目标。设置和参与者:研究者向67名未来的教师(大学生)提出了10个数学问题,从中选择了3人参与。三个焦点参与者是根据使用接近性、相似性和格式塔理论闭合方法的指标进行分类的结果来选择的。数据收集与分析:除了测试问题外,研究者还对三位焦点参与者进行了认知访谈,以确认和探索思维过程。研究人员采用焦点小组讨论(FGD)、横截面数据和相关文献综述来验证研究结果。结果:数据显示,学生在解决数字图案问题时能够运用接近、闭合、相似法则,这可以从他们将图案分成两部分、完成特定的几何形状和将其分成相似形状的能力中看出。本研究还发现,准教师在使用接近性规律、封闭性规律和相似性规律解决模式数问题时,其思维过程方案也有所不同。结论:使用接近的学生可以将每个模式分为固定和增长两部分。生长差异格局将成为形成格局一般形态的关键。使用闭合的学生可以通过添加图案元素来完成图案的特定形状。此外,使用相似性的学生将图案分成相似的形状。每位同学都表现出了良好的表达能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信