Argumentation with justified preferences

IF 1.7 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sung-Jun Pyon
{"title":"Argumentation with justified preferences","authors":"Sung-Jun Pyon","doi":"10.3233/aac-220012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often necessary and reasonable to justify preferences before reasoning from them. Moreover, justifying a preference ordering is reduced to justifying the criterion that produces the ordering. This paper builds on the well-known ASPIC+ formalism to develop a model that integrates justifying qualitative preferences with reasoning from the justified preferences. We first introduce a notion of preference criterion in order to model the way in which preferences are justified by an argumentation framework. We also adapt the notion of argumentation theory to build a sequence of argumentation frameworks, in which an argumentation framework justifies preferences that are to underlie the next framework. That is, in our formalism, preferences become not only an input of an argumentation framework, but also an output of it. This kind of input-output process can be applied in the further steps of argumentation. We also explore some interesting properties of our formalism.","PeriodicalId":44268,"journal":{"name":"Argument & Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument & Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-220012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is often necessary and reasonable to justify preferences before reasoning from them. Moreover, justifying a preference ordering is reduced to justifying the criterion that produces the ordering. This paper builds on the well-known ASPIC+ formalism to develop a model that integrates justifying qualitative preferences with reasoning from the justified preferences. We first introduce a notion of preference criterion in order to model the way in which preferences are justified by an argumentation framework. We also adapt the notion of argumentation theory to build a sequence of argumentation frameworks, in which an argumentation framework justifies preferences that are to underlie the next framework. That is, in our formalism, preferences become not only an input of an argumentation framework, but also an output of it. This kind of input-output process can be applied in the further steps of argumentation. We also explore some interesting properties of our formalism.
论证与合理的偏好
在从偏好中推理之前,证明偏好的合理性通常是必要和合理的。此外,证明首选项排序的正确性被简化为证明产生排序的标准的正确性。本文建立在著名的ASPIC+形式主义的基础上,开发了一个模型,该模型集成了对定性偏好的证明和对合理偏好的推理。我们首先引入偏好标准的概念,以便通过论证框架对偏好进行论证的方式进行建模。我们还调整了论证理论的概念来构建一系列的论证框架,其中一个论证框架证明了作为下一个框架基础的偏好。也就是说,在我们的形式主义中,偏好不仅成为论证框架的输入,而且成为它的输出。这种输入输出过程可以应用于论证的进一步步骤。我们还探讨了形式主义的一些有趣的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Argument & Computation
Argument & Computation COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信