Selected Issues of the Prospects for the Use of “Electronic Justice”: Experience of the Russian Federation and Foreign Countries

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ludmila A. Zelenskaya
{"title":"Selected Issues of the Prospects for the Use of “Electronic Justice”: Experience of the Russian Federation and Foreign Countries","authors":"Ludmila A. Zelenskaya","doi":"10.24158/tipor.2023.10.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the peculiarities of digitalization of Russian justice and the problems arising in the course of this process. Exploring the “electronic justice”, the author analyzes the domestic specifics of its legal regula-tion, focusing in detail on such problematic aspects as the definition of the essence and features of the desig-nated concept, and also considers the status of electronic evidence, after which he compares them with similar institutions in a number of foreign countries, including European countries, India, as well as China. Separately, the author examines international acts on the regulation of the digitalization of justice. The study shows the im-portance of introducing digital institutions into the practice of law enforcement. Digitalization of judicial pro-ceedings, the objective consequence of which is the introduction of both individual technological innovations and, in general, the transition to electronic justice, necessitates the reform of classical and the creation of fun-damentally new judicial institutions. Based on the generalization of issues of legislative regulation and the practice of applying international and the experience of some foreign countries, the author justifies that it is quite possible to use certain different elements of electronic justice in domestic legal proceedings, for example, the creation of specialized judicial structures by analogy with the Chinese judicial authority, whose jurisdiction includes Internet disputes.","PeriodicalId":36110,"journal":{"name":"Finance: Theory and Practice","volume":"27 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2023.10.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses the peculiarities of digitalization of Russian justice and the problems arising in the course of this process. Exploring the “electronic justice”, the author analyzes the domestic specifics of its legal regula-tion, focusing in detail on such problematic aspects as the definition of the essence and features of the desig-nated concept, and also considers the status of electronic evidence, after which he compares them with similar institutions in a number of foreign countries, including European countries, India, as well as China. Separately, the author examines international acts on the regulation of the digitalization of justice. The study shows the im-portance of introducing digital institutions into the practice of law enforcement. Digitalization of judicial pro-ceedings, the objective consequence of which is the introduction of both individual technological innovations and, in general, the transition to electronic justice, necessitates the reform of classical and the creation of fun-damentally new judicial institutions. Based on the generalization of issues of legislative regulation and the practice of applying international and the experience of some foreign countries, the author justifies that it is quite possible to use certain different elements of electronic justice in domestic legal proceedings, for example, the creation of specialized judicial structures by analogy with the Chinese judicial authority, whose jurisdiction includes Internet disputes.
使用“电子司法”前景的若干问题:俄罗斯联邦和外国的经验
本文论述了俄罗斯司法数字化的特点以及在这一过程中出现的问题。笔者在探讨“电子司法”的基础上,分析了国内对“电子司法”法律规制的具体情况,重点对“电子司法”概念的本质界定和特征等存在问题的方面进行了详细的分析,并对电子证据的地位进行了思考,然后将其与欧洲、印度、中国等一些国家的类似制度进行了比较。另外,作者审查了关于司法数字化监管的国际法案。该研究显示了将数字机构引入执法实践的重要性。司法程序的数字化,其客观后果是引入个人技术创新,并总体上向电子司法过渡,这需要对传统司法机构进行改革,并从根本上建立新的司法机构。通过对立法规制问题的概括、国际应用实践和国外一些国家的经验,笔者认为在国内诉讼中运用电子司法的某些不同要素是完全可能的,例如,可以借鉴中国司法机关的做法,建立专门的司法机构,将网络纠纷纳入其管辖范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Finance: Theory and Practice
Finance: Theory and Practice Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信