Quality of Life among Low-Income Older Residents in Subsidized Senior Housing: Rural vs. Suburban Comparisons

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
BoRin Kim, Chung Hyeon Jeong, Sojung Park, Casey Golomski, Marguerite Corvini, John Wilcox, Allysha Winburn, Emily Blood
{"title":"Quality of Life among Low-Income Older Residents in Subsidized Senior Housing: Rural vs. Suburban Comparisons","authors":"BoRin Kim, Chung Hyeon Jeong, Sojung Park, Casey Golomski, Marguerite Corvini, John Wilcox, Allysha Winburn, Emily Blood","doi":"10.1080/01488376.2023.2271944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractOlder adults living in subsidized senior housing tend to be at risk for poor psychological well-being related to their advanced age and low income. This study aims to explore multilevel factors affecting perceived quality of life (QoL) among non-urban subsidized senior housing residents and to compare these factors between rural and suburban communities. Community/residential-level data were collected from the interviews with residential service coordinators (RSC) of five subsidized senior housing communities in the New England region: two rural and three suburban communities. Individual- and interpersonal-level data came from the survey with 82 residents. A mixed-methods approach was utilized. We used thematic content analyses for the interview data and multivariate ordered logit regression for the survey data. Our results showed that rural residence was positively associated with QoL (OR = 4.913, p<.01) even after controlling for all the individual-, interpersonal-, and community/residential-level factors. From RSCs’ perspectives, four main themes emerged, which could potentially contribute to better QoL among senior housing residents: access to services, social spaces for residents, inequitable connections to community resources, and social engagements among senior housing residents and with RSCs. Our findings contribute to the development of strategies to improve QoL among older adults living in rural/non-metropolitan subsidized senior housing.Keywords: Subsidized senior housingruralsuburbanquality of life Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Quotes are taken directly from sources. Researchers support the use of person first language. While some sources may utilize language that is not person-first, the quote has not been altered in order to preserve the authenticity of the individual’s statement.","PeriodicalId":47419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Service Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Service Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2023.2271944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractOlder adults living in subsidized senior housing tend to be at risk for poor psychological well-being related to their advanced age and low income. This study aims to explore multilevel factors affecting perceived quality of life (QoL) among non-urban subsidized senior housing residents and to compare these factors between rural and suburban communities. Community/residential-level data were collected from the interviews with residential service coordinators (RSC) of five subsidized senior housing communities in the New England region: two rural and three suburban communities. Individual- and interpersonal-level data came from the survey with 82 residents. A mixed-methods approach was utilized. We used thematic content analyses for the interview data and multivariate ordered logit regression for the survey data. Our results showed that rural residence was positively associated with QoL (OR = 4.913, p<.01) even after controlling for all the individual-, interpersonal-, and community/residential-level factors. From RSCs’ perspectives, four main themes emerged, which could potentially contribute to better QoL among senior housing residents: access to services, social spaces for residents, inequitable connections to community resources, and social engagements among senior housing residents and with RSCs. Our findings contribute to the development of strategies to improve QoL among older adults living in rural/non-metropolitan subsidized senior housing.Keywords: Subsidized senior housingruralsuburbanquality of life Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Quotes are taken directly from sources. Researchers support the use of person first language. While some sources may utilize language that is not person-first, the quote has not been altered in order to preserve the authenticity of the individual’s statement.
补贴老年住房中低收入老年居民的生活质量:农村与郊区的比较
生活在保障性老年住房中的老年人由于年龄大、收入低,存在心理健康状况不佳的风险。本研究旨在探讨影响非城市保障性老年住房居民感知生活质量(QoL)的多层次因素,并比较农村和郊区社区的这些因素。通过对新英格兰地区5个补贴老年住房社区(2个农村社区和3个郊区社区)的居住服务协调员(RSC)的访谈,收集了社区/住宅层面的数据。个人和人际层面的数据来自对82名居民的调查。采用混合方法。访谈数据采用主题内容分析,调查数据采用多元有序logistic回归。我们的研究结果显示,即使在控制了所有个人、人际和社区/居住水平的因素后,农村居住与生活质量呈正相关(OR = 4.913, p< 0.01)。从rsc的角度来看,出现了四个主要主题,这可能有助于改善老年住房居民的生活质量:获得服务的机会、居民的社会空间、与社区资源的不公平联系,以及老年住房居民和rsc之间的社会参与。我们的研究结果有助于制定改善农村/非大城市补贴老年住房老年人生活质量的策略。关键词:保障性老年住房农村郊区生活质量披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。注1引用直接来自资料来源。研究人员支持使用以人为本的语言。虽然一些消息来源可能会使用不以人为本的语言,但为了保持个人陈述的真实性,引用并没有被改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Service Research is exclusively devoted to empirical research and its application to the design, delivery, and management of the new social services. The Journal focuses on outcomes-based research and practice, and clearly presents the different types of funded and non-funded state-of-the-art research being carried out in the field. Each issue effectively highlights both the quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Contributors from the national and international social service arenas provide an important and critical basis for management and policy decisions in a wide variety of social service settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信