Doctors of the Roman garrison of Tyras

IF 0.2 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Askold Ivantchik
{"title":"Doctors of the Roman garrison of Tyras","authors":"Askold Ivantchik","doi":"10.33782/eminak2023.2(42).646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article revises the readings of two inscriptions of Tyras which presumably contain information about the organization of the medical service in the Roman garrison of that city in the 2nd century AD. The first of these (L’Année épigraphique, 1995, 1350) confirms the mention of medicus vexillationis, a term unknown in other texts; the inscription belongs to the very few evidences of the existence of the position of doctor of vexillation. It confirms the existence of at least two doctors in the vexillation of Tyras, one of whom was a naval doctor. The inscription is the only evidence so far to show that doctors serving in the provincial, and not only praetorian (Misene and Ravennate) fleets had the status of duplicarius.
 However, the inscription itself turns out to be of a different nature than its first publisher P.O. Karyshkovsky had suggested – it is not an honorary inscription, but a dedication to Asclepius and Hygia on behalf of not only two doctors, but also two legionaries, presumably privates. The text of the first three lines is reconstructed differently: [D(eo) A]ṣclepio • et • Hygi(ae) | [e.g. T(itus) • Fl(avius) •] Ṣuccessus • M(arcus) • Ata|[eus? • P]ḷacid[(us) m(ilites)] ḷeg(ionis) • Ī • Ital(icae).
 In the second inscription (L’Année épigraphique, 1990, 869) the mention of the unique term valetudinarius, usually interpreted as referring to personnel of hospital (valetudinarium), is not confirmed. In its place the cognomen of one of the dedicants Valens is to be restored and the term itself must be considered a “ghost”.","PeriodicalId":33493,"journal":{"name":"Eminak","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eminak","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2023.2(42).646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article revises the readings of two inscriptions of Tyras which presumably contain information about the organization of the medical service in the Roman garrison of that city in the 2nd century AD. The first of these (L’Année épigraphique, 1995, 1350) confirms the mention of medicus vexillationis, a term unknown in other texts; the inscription belongs to the very few evidences of the existence of the position of doctor of vexillation. It confirms the existence of at least two doctors in the vexillation of Tyras, one of whom was a naval doctor. The inscription is the only evidence so far to show that doctors serving in the provincial, and not only praetorian (Misene and Ravennate) fleets had the status of duplicarius. However, the inscription itself turns out to be of a different nature than its first publisher P.O. Karyshkovsky had suggested – it is not an honorary inscription, but a dedication to Asclepius and Hygia on behalf of not only two doctors, but also two legionaries, presumably privates. The text of the first three lines is reconstructed differently: [D(eo) A]ṣclepio • et • Hygi(ae) | [e.g. T(itus) • Fl(avius) •] Ṣuccessus • M(arcus) • Ata|[eus? • P]ḷacid[(us) m(ilites)] ḷeg(ionis) • Ī • Ital(icae). In the second inscription (L’Année épigraphique, 1990, 869) the mention of the unique term valetudinarius, usually interpreted as referring to personnel of hospital (valetudinarium), is not confirmed. In its place the cognomen of one of the dedicants Valens is to be restored and the term itself must be considered a “ghost”.
提拉斯罗马驻军的医生
这篇文章修正了对提拉斯的两个铭文的解读,这两个铭文可能包含了公元2世纪罗马驻军在该市的医疗服务组织的信息。其中第一份文件(L ' annacei , 1995年,1350年)证实提到了medicus vexillationis,这是一个在其他文本中未知的术语;铭文属于极少数的证据,医生的地位的存在烦恼。它证实了在提拉斯的烦恼中至少有两个医生的存在,其中一个是海军医生。这一铭文是迄今为止唯一的证据,表明在省而不仅仅是禁卫军(米塞尼和拉文纳特)舰队服役的医生具有双重身份。然而,铭文本身的性质与它的第一个出版商P.O.卡里什科夫斯基所暗示的不同——它不是一个荣誉的铭文,而是对阿斯克勒皮俄斯和海吉亚的奉献,不仅代表两位医生,而且代表两位军团士兵,可能是列兵。前三行文本的重构方式不同:[D(eo) A]ṣclepio•et•Hygi(ae) |[例如T(itus)•Fl(avius)•]Ṣuccessus•M(arcus)•Ata|[eus?•P]ḷ酸((美国)m()))ḷ如(ionis)•Ī•斜体字(icae) # x0D公司;在第二个铭文中(L ' annaceme , 1990年,869年)提到valetudinarius这个独特的术语,通常被解释为指医院(valetudinarium)的工作人员,但这一说法没有得到证实。在它的位置上,一个献身者瓦伦斯的名字将被恢复,这个词本身必须被认为是“幽灵”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信