Regarding one flint item from the collection of the Upper Paleolithic site Kaystrova Balka IV

IF 0.2 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Igor Pistruil
{"title":"Regarding one flint item from the collection of the Upper Paleolithic site Kaystrova Balka IV","authors":"Igor Pistruil","doi":"10.33782/eminak2023.2(42).638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Kaystrova Balka IV site was discovered by A.V. Dobrovolsky in Kaystrova Balka in 1933. In 1936, A.N. Rogachev examined the collections from Kaystrova Balka sites and made their technical and typological classification. Then, these materials were transferred to the Odesa State Historical and Archaeological Museum. In 1971, S.V. Smirnov published the flint inventory from the Kaystrova Balka IV site.
 The purpose of the article is the typological attribution of flint product from the collection of the Upper Paleolithic site of Kaistrova balka IV.
 The scientific novelty. In the 20th century and now, the typological method is widely used for processing archaeological collections. This method is widely used for collections of sites of the Stone Age, when we do not always understand what we are working on. On the basis of the typological analysis of the products of knepping of flint (core, chips, etc.), a reconstruction of the technology of staged primary splitting is proposed, thanks to which a new typological attribution of the product is proved.
 Conclusions. Іn general terms, it is possible to reconstruct the technology of primary splitting at the Kaystrova Balka IV site. At the first stage, the platform was prepared (most likely with one strike). At the second stage, the blanks were spalled. The spalling could also occur without the initial preparation of the rib, which is typical for the prismatic technique. At the third stage, one massive spall was made. After that, further splitting could occur with or without making a rib.
 This reconstruction of primary splitting at the Kaystrova Balka IV site allows us to assume that the examined item appeared at the first or second stage. Thus, this item is a flake, which was chipped from the nucleus at the very beginning of the primary splitting.","PeriodicalId":33493,"journal":{"name":"Eminak","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eminak","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2023.2(42).638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Kaystrova Balka IV site was discovered by A.V. Dobrovolsky in Kaystrova Balka in 1933. In 1936, A.N. Rogachev examined the collections from Kaystrova Balka sites and made their technical and typological classification. Then, these materials were transferred to the Odesa State Historical and Archaeological Museum. In 1971, S.V. Smirnov published the flint inventory from the Kaystrova Balka IV site. The purpose of the article is the typological attribution of flint product from the collection of the Upper Paleolithic site of Kaistrova balka IV. The scientific novelty. In the 20th century and now, the typological method is widely used for processing archaeological collections. This method is widely used for collections of sites of the Stone Age, when we do not always understand what we are working on. On the basis of the typological analysis of the products of knepping of flint (core, chips, etc.), a reconstruction of the technology of staged primary splitting is proposed, thanks to which a new typological attribution of the product is proved. Conclusions. Іn general terms, it is possible to reconstruct the technology of primary splitting at the Kaystrova Balka IV site. At the first stage, the platform was prepared (most likely with one strike). At the second stage, the blanks were spalled. The spalling could also occur without the initial preparation of the rib, which is typical for the prismatic technique. At the third stage, one massive spall was made. After that, further splitting could occur with or without making a rib. This reconstruction of primary splitting at the Kaystrova Balka IV site allows us to assume that the examined item appeared at the first or second stage. Thus, this item is a flake, which was chipped from the nucleus at the very beginning of the primary splitting.
关于旧石器时代晚期遗址Kaystrova Balka IV收集的一件燧石
1933年,多布罗沃尔斯基在Kaystrova Balka发现了Kaystrova Balka IV遗址。1936年,a·n·罗加乔夫(A.N. Rogachev)检查了来自Kaystrova Balka遗址的藏品,并对它们进行了技术和类型分类。然后,这些材料被转移到敖德萨国家历史和考古博物馆。1971年,S.V.斯米尔诺夫公布了Kaystrova Balka IV站点的燧石清单。 本文的目的是对Kaistrova balka IV旧石器时代晚期遗址收集的燧石产品进行类型学归属。科学的新奇。在20世纪和现在,类型学方法被广泛应用于考古收藏品的处理。这种方法被广泛用于石器时代遗址的收集,因为我们并不总是知道我们在做什么。在对火石(岩心、岩屑等)揉制产物进行类型学分析的基础上,提出了阶段初级劈裂工艺的重构方法,从而证明了产品的新的类型学归属。 结论。Іn一般来说,在Kaystrova Balka IV站点重建一次分裂技术是可能的。在第一阶段,准备好了平台(很可能是一次打击)。在第二阶段,毛坯被剥落。剥落也可能在没有对肋骨进行初始准备的情况下发生,这是棱柱形技术的典型特点。在第三阶段,形成了一个巨大的碎片。在那之后,进一步的分裂可能会发生,也可能不会形成肋骨。 在Kaystrova Balka IV地点的原始分裂重建使我们能够假设所检查的项目出现在第一或第二阶段。因此,这个项目是一个薄片,在最初的分裂开始时从细胞核中脱落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信