Comparison of Forecasting Accuracy Using the Short Moving Average (SMA) Method Using Boxplot Outlier Filtering and Not Using Outlier Filtering for Data that has a high level of variation

None Akhmad Tajuddin Tholaby MS
{"title":"Comparison of Forecasting Accuracy Using the Short Moving Average (SMA) Method Using Boxplot Outlier Filtering and Not Using Outlier Filtering for Data that has a high level of variation","authors":"None Akhmad Tajuddin Tholaby MS","doi":"10.47577/technium.v17i.10098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Short Moving Average (SMA) forecasting method is one of the most widely used forecasting methods, especially for processing data with a high level of variation and is not linear with time. However, opportunities to develop and improve forecasting performance using the SMA method are still wide open. The performance of a forecasting method can be seen from the distribution of errors. SMA does not see and does not sort the type of input data that will be processed into a forecast value, whether the input data has small or large variations, or has outlier data. If the input data has an outlier, then that outlier can make the forecasting performance not good. One of the efforts to improve SMA forecasting performance is by filtering outlier data. In this study, a comparison was made of the forecasting results for SMA using outlier filtering with the forecasting results for SMA not using outlier filtering. The next step is to compare the error values, namely those that produce the smallest Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values. From the results of the study it can be seen that the performance of SMA using the Boxplot filtering method gives better forecasting results than those without using outlier filtering.","PeriodicalId":490649,"journal":{"name":"Technium","volume":"5 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v17i.10098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Short Moving Average (SMA) forecasting method is one of the most widely used forecasting methods, especially for processing data with a high level of variation and is not linear with time. However, opportunities to develop and improve forecasting performance using the SMA method are still wide open. The performance of a forecasting method can be seen from the distribution of errors. SMA does not see and does not sort the type of input data that will be processed into a forecast value, whether the input data has small or large variations, or has outlier data. If the input data has an outlier, then that outlier can make the forecasting performance not good. One of the efforts to improve SMA forecasting performance is by filtering outlier data. In this study, a comparison was made of the forecasting results for SMA using outlier filtering with the forecasting results for SMA not using outlier filtering. The next step is to compare the error values, namely those that produce the smallest Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values. From the results of the study it can be seen that the performance of SMA using the Boxplot filtering method gives better forecasting results than those without using outlier filtering.
对于具有高变化水平的数据,使用箱线图离群值滤波和不使用离群值滤波的短移动平均(SMA)方法预测精度的比较
短期移动平均线(SMA)预测方法是应用最广泛的预测方法之一,尤其适用于处理高度变化且不随时间线性变化的数据。然而,使用SMA方法开发和改进预测性能的机会仍然很大。从误差的分布可以看出预测方法的性能。SMA没有看到也没有对将被处理成预测值的输入数据的类型进行排序,无论输入数据是有小的还是大的变化,或者有离群数据。如果输入数据存在离群值,那么该离群值会使预测性能不佳。提高SMA预测性能的方法之一是过滤异常值数据。本研究将使用离群值滤波的SMA预测结果与未使用离群值滤波的SMA预测结果进行了比较。下一步是比较误差值,即产生最小均方误差(MSE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)值的误差值。从研究结果可以看出,采用箱线图滤波方法的SMA的预测效果优于未使用离群值滤波的SMA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信