675 Safety and tolerability of magrolimab combination therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC)

A Dimitrios Colevas, Katie Kerrigan, Venessa Chin, Natalie Rainey, John Park, Bruno Fang, Diogo Alpuim Costa, José Dinis, Minh Phan, Lanjia Lin, Yiran Zhang, Siu-Chi Chang Sun, Michael Howland, Kelly Curtis, Douglas Adkins
{"title":"675 Safety and tolerability of magrolimab combination therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC)","authors":"A Dimitrios Colevas, Katie Kerrigan, Venessa Chin, Natalie Rainey, John Park, Bruno Fang, Diogo Alpuim Costa, José Dinis, Minh Phan, Lanjia Lin, Yiran Zhang, Siu-Chi Chang Sun, Michael Howland, Kelly Curtis, Douglas Adkins","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2023-sitc2023.0675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3> Novel combination therapies are needed to improve outcomes in RM-HNSCC. Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks CD47, a ‘don’t eat me’ signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Magrolimab induces macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and may synergize with chemotherapy agents through enhancement of phagocytic signals. The Phase 2 ELEVATE HNSCC multicenter, open-label study (NCT04854499) is evaluating magrolimab-containing regimens in patients with RM-HNSCC (figure 1). Here, we report data from 2 safety run-ins (SRI1 and SRI2) designed to assess safety/tolerability and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of magrolimab in combination with standard of care. <h3>Methods</h3> Patients in SRI1 with previously untreated RM-HNSCC received magrolimab+pembrolizumab+platinum+5-fluorouracil; patients in SRI2 with locally advanced or RM-HNSCC (1–2 lines of prior systemic therapy) received magrolimab+docetaxel. Magrolimab was first administered as a 1 mg/kg priming dose, followed by weekly 30 mg/kg doses for two 21-day cycles and then a maintenance dose of 60 mg/kg Q3W. Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy were given per standard of care. Primary endpoints of the SRI were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug. The incidence of DLTs was assessed using patients who experienced a DLT during the DLT evaluation period or who completed ≥2 magrolimab and ≥1 combination agent doses. To select an RP2D, ≤2 of 6 DLT-evaluable patients could experience a DLT, or the magrolimab dose would be de-escalated and a new cohort would be assessed. <h3>Results</h3> At least 6 patients from each SRI were considered DLT-evaluable. The safety analysis population consisted of 6 patients in SRI1 and 7 patients in SRI2. No DLTs were reported. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 6/6 (SRI1) and 7/7 (SRI2) patients (table 1). The most common TEAEs observed in each SRI were fatigue (SRI1) and anemia (SRI2). TEAEs leading to magrolimab discontinuation occurred in 1/6 patients in SRI1 (fatigue) and 1/7 patients in SRI2 (oral cavity fistula unrelated to study drug). In SRI1, no deaths were reported; 3 deaths were reported as unrelated to study treatment and occurred after the DLT evaluation period in SRI2: oral cavity fistula, pneumonia, and disease progression (during long-term follow-up). <h3>Conclusions</h3> The observed safety profile was as expected based on the known toxicity profiles of the individual agents. Magrolimab appears tolerable in these combinations. No DLTs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Magrolimab RP2D was declared at the initial dose level tested in both SRIs. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT04854499 <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> The protocol and proposed informed consent form were reviewed and approved by all relevant Institutional Review Boards, Independent Ethics Committees and/or Research Ethics Boards prior to study commencement. There is no number provided as we did not receive one. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. <h3>Consent</h3> The protocol and proposed informed consent form were reviewed and approved by all relevant Institutional Review Boards, Independent Ethics Committees and/or Research Ethics Boards prior to study commencement. There is no number provided as we did not receive one. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.","PeriodicalId":500964,"journal":{"name":"Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts","volume":"11 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-sitc2023.0675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Novel combination therapies are needed to improve outcomes in RM-HNSCC. Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks CD47, a ‘don’t eat me’ signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Magrolimab induces macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and may synergize with chemotherapy agents through enhancement of phagocytic signals. The Phase 2 ELEVATE HNSCC multicenter, open-label study (NCT04854499) is evaluating magrolimab-containing regimens in patients with RM-HNSCC (figure 1). Here, we report data from 2 safety run-ins (SRI1 and SRI2) designed to assess safety/tolerability and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of magrolimab in combination with standard of care.

Methods

Patients in SRI1 with previously untreated RM-HNSCC received magrolimab+pembrolizumab+platinum+5-fluorouracil; patients in SRI2 with locally advanced or RM-HNSCC (1–2 lines of prior systemic therapy) received magrolimab+docetaxel. Magrolimab was first administered as a 1 mg/kg priming dose, followed by weekly 30 mg/kg doses for two 21-day cycles and then a maintenance dose of 60 mg/kg Q3W. Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy were given per standard of care. Primary endpoints of the SRI were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug. The incidence of DLTs was assessed using patients who experienced a DLT during the DLT evaluation period or who completed ≥2 magrolimab and ≥1 combination agent doses. To select an RP2D, ≤2 of 6 DLT-evaluable patients could experience a DLT, or the magrolimab dose would be de-escalated and a new cohort would be assessed.

Results

At least 6 patients from each SRI were considered DLT-evaluable. The safety analysis population consisted of 6 patients in SRI1 and 7 patients in SRI2. No DLTs were reported. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 6/6 (SRI1) and 7/7 (SRI2) patients (table 1). The most common TEAEs observed in each SRI were fatigue (SRI1) and anemia (SRI2). TEAEs leading to magrolimab discontinuation occurred in 1/6 patients in SRI1 (fatigue) and 1/7 patients in SRI2 (oral cavity fistula unrelated to study drug). In SRI1, no deaths were reported; 3 deaths were reported as unrelated to study treatment and occurred after the DLT evaluation period in SRI2: oral cavity fistula, pneumonia, and disease progression (during long-term follow-up).

Conclusions

The observed safety profile was as expected based on the known toxicity profiles of the individual agents. Magrolimab appears tolerable in these combinations. No DLTs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Magrolimab RP2D was declared at the initial dose level tested in both SRIs.

Trial Registration

NCT04854499

Ethics Approval

The protocol and proposed informed consent form were reviewed and approved by all relevant Institutional Review Boards, Independent Ethics Committees and/or Research Ethics Boards prior to study commencement. There is no number provided as we did not receive one. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Consent

The protocol and proposed informed consent form were reviewed and approved by all relevant Institutional Review Boards, Independent Ethics Committees and/or Research Ethics Boards prior to study commencement. There is no number provided as we did not receive one. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
美格罗单抗联合治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(RM-HNSCC)的安全性和耐受性
背景:需要新的联合治疗来改善RM-HNSCC的预后。Magrolimab是一种单克隆抗体,可以阻断CD47,一种在癌细胞上过度表达的“不要吃我”信号。麦格罗单抗诱导巨噬细胞介导的肿瘤细胞吞噬,并可能通过增强吞噬信号与化疗药物协同作用。2期ELEVATE HNSCC多中心开放标签研究(NCT04854499)正在评估含有马格罗单抗的RM-HNSCC患者方案(图1)。在这里,我们报告了2项安全性试验(SRI1和SRI2)的数据,旨在评估安全性/耐受性和推荐的马格罗单抗联合标准治疗的2期剂量(RP2D)。方法SRI1患者既往未接受治疗的RM-HNSCC患者接受麦格罗单抗+派姆单抗+铂+5-氟尿嘧啶治疗;伴有局部晚期或RM-HNSCC的SRI2患者(既往接受1-2行全身治疗)接受美格罗单抗+多西他赛。首先以1mg /kg的起始剂量给药,然后每周给药30mg /kg,连续两个21天周期,然后维持剂量为60mg /kg Q3W。根据标准护理给予派姆单抗和化疗。SRI的主要终点是不良事件(ae)和剂量限制性毒性(dlt)的发生率。对接受≥1剂量研究药物的患者进行安全性评估。使用在DLT评估期间经历DLT的患者或完成≥2剂量的美格罗单抗和≥1剂量的联合用药的患者来评估DLT的发生率。为了选择RP2D, 6例可评估DLT的患者中≤2例可经历DLT,或者降低美洛单抗剂量,并评估一个新的队列。结果每个SRI中至少有6例患者被认为可进行dlt评估。安全性分析人群包括6例SRI1患者和7例SRI2患者。未见DLTs报告。治疗突发事件(teae)发生在6/6 (SRI1)和7/7 (SRI2)患者中(表1)。在每种SRI中观察到的最常见的teae是疲劳(SRI1)和贫血(SRI2)。1/6的SRI1患者(疲劳)和1/7的SRI2患者(与研究药物无关的口腔瘘)发生teae导致停药。在SRI1中,无死亡报告;3例死亡报告与研究治疗无关,发生在SRI2的DLT评估期之后:口腔瘘、肺炎和疾病进展(长期随访期间)。结论:观察到的安全性是基于已知的单个药物的毒性特征所预期的。在这些组合中,Magrolimab似乎是耐受的。未发生dlt或治疗相关死亡。在两种SRIs试验中,美格罗单抗RP2D均达到初始剂量水平。在研究开始前,所有相关的机构审查委员会、独立伦理委员会和/或研究伦理委员会对方案和拟议的知情同意书进行了审查和批准。没有提供号码,因为我们没有收到。参与者在参加研究前给予知情同意。在研究开始前,所有相关机构审查委员会、独立伦理委员会和/或研究伦理委员会对方案和拟议的知情同意书进行了审查和批准。没有提供号码,因为我们没有收到。参与者在参加研究前给予知情同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信