SYSTEMATIZATION OF STRATEGIC PLANNING ACTS: THEORETICAL LEGAL ASPECT

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
D. R. Mamyasheva
{"title":"SYSTEMATIZATION OF STRATEGIC PLANNING ACTS: THEORETICAL LEGAL ASPECT","authors":"D. R. Mamyasheva","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2023-61-403-414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: currently, there are several thousand acts of strategic planning operating at all three levels (according to the Federal Register of Strategic Planning Documents). These acts include both those specified by the Law on Strategic Planning and those not provided for by it. Many acts of strategic planning are not included in the state register, which makes it difficult to analyze the entire picture of strategic planning in the country and the corresponding acts. The article aims to provide theoretical systematization of strategic planning acts and define practical directions for optimizing such a system and increasing its effectiveness. Methods: basic principles, laws, and categories of dialectical materialism, general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, system-structural method), and special scientific methods (formal-legal and comparative legal). Results: the study revealed numerous normative defects of legal systematization of strategic planning acts; the author developed an algorithm that is supposed to contribute to the effective systematization of acts in question, taking into account that the Federal Law ‘On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation’ is the core regulatory legal act in this area and contains an exhaustive list of acts of strategic planning.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-61-403-414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: currently, there are several thousand acts of strategic planning operating at all three levels (according to the Federal Register of Strategic Planning Documents). These acts include both those specified by the Law on Strategic Planning and those not provided for by it. Many acts of strategic planning are not included in the state register, which makes it difficult to analyze the entire picture of strategic planning in the country and the corresponding acts. The article aims to provide theoretical systematization of strategic planning acts and define practical directions for optimizing such a system and increasing its effectiveness. Methods: basic principles, laws, and categories of dialectical materialism, general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, system-structural method), and special scientific methods (formal-legal and comparative legal). Results: the study revealed numerous normative defects of legal systematization of strategic planning acts; the author developed an algorithm that is supposed to contribute to the effective systematization of acts in question, taking into account that the Federal Law ‘On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation’ is the core regulatory legal act in this area and contains an exhaustive list of acts of strategic planning.
战略规划行为的系统化:理论与法律层面
导言:目前,在所有三个层面上有数千项战略规划行动(根据联邦战略规划文件登记册)。这些行为既包括《战略规划法》具体规定的行为,也包括《战略规划法》没有规定的行为。许多战略规划行为没有被列入国家登记册,这使得分析国家战略规划的全貌和相应的行为变得困难。本文旨在为战略规划行为提供理论体系,并为优化战略规划行为体系、提高战略规划行为的有效性确定实践方向。方法:辩证唯物主义的基本原理、规律和范畴,一般科学方法(分析、综合、系统结构方法)和特殊科学方法(形式法、比较法)。结果:研究揭示了战略规划行为法律制度化的诸多规范性缺陷;考虑到“俄罗斯联邦战略规划”联邦法是这一领域的核心监管法律行为,并且包含了战略规划行为的详尽清单,作者开发了一种算法,该算法应该有助于有效地将有关行为系统化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信