ARCHITECTONICS OF A UNIVERSITY’S OPEN DATA LEGAL REGIME

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
N. V. Syropiatova, E. Yu. Martyanova
{"title":"ARCHITECTONICS OF A UNIVERSITY’S OPEN DATA LEGAL REGIME","authors":"N. V. Syropiatova, E. Yu. Martyanova","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2023-60-312-329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: openness is a new global standard permeating all spheres of activity. The creation of open data arrays by universities and their placement on the Internet has become a common practice both in Russia and abroad. However, a full-fledged theoretical understanding of the nature of such data has not been achieved, a regulatory platform has not been formed in Russian law. The abovementioned creates risks of violation of both private and public interests. Purpose: to determine the structure of the legal regime of open data of universities. Methods: general scientific methods, including analysis, synthesis, concrete historical method, systematic approach, comparative legal and legal-dogmatic methods. Results: the study revealed that the criteria for classifying data as open should be divided into technical, hermeneutical, and legal. It was established that the data sets that are required to be published online in accordance with Article 29 of the Federal Law ‘On Education in the Russian Federation’ do not belong to the category of open data. The authors have developed a three-stage test to resolve the question of whether research data is open data. The key directions, goals, and risks of implementing the open data policy of universities are identified. According to the criterion ‘(un)identifiability of the list of users’, two types of openness are distinguished and described: endo-openness and exo-openness. The paper presents proposals on changes in the legislation regarding the establishment of the procedure for licensing of open data. Conclusions: open university data is an object of information and educational relations in the absence of a proper legal framework governing the generation, placement, use, updating, transmission, storage, and deletion of such data. The creation of a regulatory framework for the regulation of these relations is a new challenge facing the legislator and requiring a prompt response.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-60-312-329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: openness is a new global standard permeating all spheres of activity. The creation of open data arrays by universities and their placement on the Internet has become a common practice both in Russia and abroad. However, a full-fledged theoretical understanding of the nature of such data has not been achieved, a regulatory platform has not been formed in Russian law. The abovementioned creates risks of violation of both private and public interests. Purpose: to determine the structure of the legal regime of open data of universities. Methods: general scientific methods, including analysis, synthesis, concrete historical method, systematic approach, comparative legal and legal-dogmatic methods. Results: the study revealed that the criteria for classifying data as open should be divided into technical, hermeneutical, and legal. It was established that the data sets that are required to be published online in accordance with Article 29 of the Federal Law ‘On Education in the Russian Federation’ do not belong to the category of open data. The authors have developed a three-stage test to resolve the question of whether research data is open data. The key directions, goals, and risks of implementing the open data policy of universities are identified. According to the criterion ‘(un)identifiability of the list of users’, two types of openness are distinguished and described: endo-openness and exo-openness. The paper presents proposals on changes in the legislation regarding the establishment of the procedure for licensing of open data. Conclusions: open university data is an object of information and educational relations in the absence of a proper legal framework governing the generation, placement, use, updating, transmission, storage, and deletion of such data. The creation of a regulatory framework for the regulation of these relations is a new challenge facing the legislator and requiring a prompt response.
大学开放数据法律制度的架构
引言:开放是一种新的全球标准,渗透到所有活动领域。大学创建开放数据阵列并将其放置在互联网上已成为俄罗斯和国外的一种常见做法。然而,对这些数据的性质还没有一个全面的理论认识,俄罗斯法律还没有形成一个监管平台。上述情况造成了侵犯私人和公共利益的风险。目的:确定高校开放数据法律制度的结构。方法:一般的科学方法,包括分析方法、综合方法、具体历史方法、系统方法、比较法和法律教条法。结果:研究表明,将数据分类为开放的标准应分为技术、解释和法律。根据《俄罗斯联邦教育法》第29条规定,需要在线发布的数据集不属于开放数据的范畴。作者开发了一个三阶段测试来解决研究数据是否为开放数据的问题。明确了高校实施开放数据政策的主要方向、目标和风险。根据“用户列表的(非)可识别性”标准,区分并描述了两种类型的开放:内开放和外开放。该文件提出了关于建立开放数据许可程序的立法修改建议。结论:开放大学数据是信息和教育关系的对象,缺乏适当的法律框架来管理这些数据的生成、放置、使用、更新、传输、存储和删除。建立一个管理这些关系的管理框架是立法者面临的一项新挑战,需要迅速作出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信