Ananya Bhattacharjee, Sharifa Sultana, Mohammad Ruhul Amin, Yeshim Iqbal, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed
{"title":"“What’s the Point of Having this Conversation?”: From a Telephone Crisis Helpline in Bangladesh to the Decolonization of Mental Health Services","authors":"Ananya Bhattacharjee, Sharifa Sultana, Mohammad Ruhul Amin, Yeshim Iqbal, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed","doi":"10.1145/3616381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the HCI work on mental health is based on the Western metaphysical definition of mind that is less applicable outside the West. This paper focuses on this issue and critically examines “Kaan Pete Roi” (KPR), a suicide prevention and emotional support helpline in Bangladesh, through an interview study with 20 participants. We find that KPR’s service, grounded in the ‘befriending’ model – originating from the UK and emphasizing non-judgmental active listening without offering direct advice – often struggles to ensure callers’ safety, provide long-term support, and protect volunteers from harassment and distress. We argue that such failures are often rooted in some foundational ideas of the UK-born ‘befriending’ model that underpins the service. Building on Enrique Dussel’s decolonial philosophy, we argue that ‘befriending’ model and its underpinning Western metaphysical ideation of mind carry a colonial impulse, and discuss how community-based approaches may better address the mental health problems in the Global South.","PeriodicalId":486506,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3616381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most of the HCI work on mental health is based on the Western metaphysical definition of mind that is less applicable outside the West. This paper focuses on this issue and critically examines “Kaan Pete Roi” (KPR), a suicide prevention and emotional support helpline in Bangladesh, through an interview study with 20 participants. We find that KPR’s service, grounded in the ‘befriending’ model – originating from the UK and emphasizing non-judgmental active listening without offering direct advice – often struggles to ensure callers’ safety, provide long-term support, and protect volunteers from harassment and distress. We argue that such failures are often rooted in some foundational ideas of the UK-born ‘befriending’ model that underpins the service. Building on Enrique Dussel’s decolonial philosophy, we argue that ‘befriending’ model and its underpinning Western metaphysical ideation of mind carry a colonial impulse, and discuss how community-based approaches may better address the mental health problems in the Global South.
大多数HCI在心理健康方面的工作都是基于西方对心灵的形而上学定义,在西方以外的地方不太适用。本文重点关注这个问题,并通过对20名参与者的访谈研究,批判性地审视了“Kaan Pete Roi”(KPR),这是孟加拉国的自杀预防和情感支持热线。我们发现,KPR的服务基于“友好”模式——起源于英国,强调非评判性的积极倾听,而不提供直接建议——往往难以确保呼叫者的安全,提供长期支持,并保护志愿者免受骚扰和痛苦。我们认为,这种失败往往植根于英国诞生的“交友”模式的一些基本理念,这种模式支撑着这项服务。在恩里克·杜塞尔(Enrique Dussel)的非殖民化哲学的基础上,我们认为“友好”模式及其支撑的西方形而上学思想带有殖民冲动,并讨论了基于社区的方法如何更好地解决全球南方的心理健康问题。