Detailed comparison of two close Chinese species, Teloganopsis punctisetae (Matsumura, 1931) and T. jinghongensis (Xu, You and Hsu, 1984) (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae)

IF 0.4 4区农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY

Oriental Insects Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1080/00305316.2023.2258129

Manqing Ding, Changfa Zhou

{"title":"Detailed comparison of two close Chinese species, <i>Teloganopsis punctisetae</i> (Matsumura, 1931) and <i>T. jinghongensis</i> (Xu, You and Hsu, 1984) (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae)","authors":"Manqing Ding, Changfa Zhou","doi":"10.1080/00305316.2023.2258129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTHistorically and currently, there have been identification confusions between two closely related species, Teloganopsis punctisetae (= E. changbaishanensis Su and You, 1988, syn. nov.) and T. jinghongensis. This study provides clear digital photographs of numerous external structures of these two species and compares them in detail. Morphologically, the nymphs differ in their colour patterns and leg shapes, while the adults have different hindwings, femora, and penial projections. This comparison not only shows the differences in characteristics between these two similar species but also clarifies the identification of the genus Teloganopsis Ulmer, 1939.KEYWORDS: TaxonomynichemayflyChinamorphology AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Dr. Luke M. Jacobus (Indiana University Purdue University Columbus) for his valuable suggestion and improving this manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant numbers [31750002 and 32070475], funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD); and key projects of science-technology basic condition platform from The Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, under Grant number [2005DKA21402].","PeriodicalId":19728,"journal":{"name":"Oriental Insects","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oriental Insects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2023.2258129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTHistorically and currently, there have been identification confusions between two closely related species, Teloganopsis punctisetae (= E. changbaishanensis Su and You, 1988, syn. nov.) and T. jinghongensis. This study provides clear digital photographs of numerous external structures of these two species and compares them in detail. Morphologically, the nymphs differ in their colour patterns and leg shapes, while the adults have different hindwings, femora, and penial projections. This comparison not only shows the differences in characteristics between these two similar species but also clarifies the identification of the genus Teloganopsis Ulmer, 1939.KEYWORDS: TaxonomynichemayflyChinamorphology AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Dr. Luke M. Jacobus (Indiana University Purdue University Columbus) for his valuable suggestion and improving this manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant numbers [31750002 and 32070475], funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD); and key projects of science-technology basic condition platform from The Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, under Grant number [2005DKA21402].

查看原文本刊更多论文

中国两种近缘种——点缕绒目(Teloganopsis punctisetae, Matsumura, 1931)和jinghonggensis (Xu, You and Hsu, 1984)的详细比较(蜉蝣目:蜉蝣科)

摘要:在历史上和目前，有两个近缘种——点状端毛藓(Teloganopsis punctisetae， = E. changbaishanensis Su and You, 1988, syn. 11 .)和京红藓(T. jinghonggensis)在鉴定上存在混淆。这项研究提供了这两个物种的许多外部结构的清晰数码照片，并对它们进行了详细的比较。在形态上，若虫的颜色图案和腿的形状不同，而成虫有不同的后翅、股骨和阴茎突出。这一比较不仅显示了这两个相似物种之间的特征差异，而且澄清了Teloganopsis Ulmer, 1939属的鉴定。感谢Luke M. Jacobus博士(美国印第安纳大学普渡大学哥伦布分校)对本文的宝贵建议和改进。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。项目资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目[31750002]和[32070475]，江苏省高等学校重点学科发展项目(PAPD);国家科技部科技基础条件平台重点项目，批准号[2005DKA21402]。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Oriental Insects 生物-昆虫学

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Oriental Insects is an international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of original research articles and reviews on the taxonomy, ecology, biodiversity and evolution of insects and other land arthropods of the Old World and Australia. Manuscripts referring to Africa, Australia and Oceania are highly welcomed. Research papers covering the study of behaviour, conservation, forensic and medical entomology, urban entomology and pest control are encouraged, provided that the research has relevance to Old World or Australian entomofauna. Precedence will be given to more general manuscripts (e.g. revisions of higher taxa, papers with combined methodologies or referring to larger geographic units). Descriptive manuscripts should refer to more than a single species and contain more general results or discussion (e.g. determination keys, biological or ecological data etc.). Laboratory works without zoogeographic or taxonomic reference to the scope of the journal will not be accepted.