Supermarket Transaction Records In Dietary Evaluation – the STRIDE validation study.

Victoria Jenneson, Darren Greenwood, Graham Clarke, Timothy Rains, Becky Shute, Michelle Morris
{"title":"Supermarket Transaction Records In Dietary Evaluation – the STRIDE validation study.","authors":"Victoria Jenneson, Darren Greenwood, Graham Clarke, Timothy Rains, Becky Shute, Michelle Morris","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i3.2267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & BackgroundSupermarket transactions leave a digital footprint which offers insight into dietary habits. Use of transactions in nutrition research has increased, but these data are rarely validated. The STRIDE (Supermarket Transaction Records In Dietary Evaluation) study compares dietary estimates from supermarket transactions with self-reported intake from an online Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
 Objectives & ApproachWorking with a large UK supermarket, loyalty card customers were recruited to one of four waves (accounting for seasonal dietary variation). Participants completed an online FFQ and consented to sharing their transaction records for one year during the study, and one year prior. The Bland-Altman method was used to calculate agreement and limits of agreement between transactions and intake for daily energy, sugar, total fat, saturated fat, protein and sodium (absolute and energy-adjusted).
 Relevance to Digital FootprintsSupermarket transactions are a form of digital footprints data with advantages over survey methods, with regards scalability and objectivity, for monitoring population-level diets.
 Results1,788 participants from four UK regions gave consent. 686 participants who completed the FFQ and made purchases during the same period, were included for analysis. Participants were mostly female (72%), with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13). A regression equation for agreement is presented for estimating intake from purchases. Agreement for absolute measures was poor overall, but higher for single-person households and households reporting a higher proportion of total food purchases from the study retailer. Agreement was stronger for energy-adjusted nutrient estimates, particularly fat, with purchase records under-estimating the proportion of total energy intake from fat by just 2%.
 Conclusions & ImplicationsThe STRIDE study found that household purchases from a single retailer were a poor proxy for individual-level nutrient intakes. However, close agreement on average energy-adjusted estimates suggests purchases are a good indicator of dietary composition. Supermarket transactions have utility for population dietary assessment, ecological studies, and identifying intervention targets based on dietary patterns. Digital footprint data from transactions can contribute to the design and monitoring of national and local-level interventions.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i3.2267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction & BackgroundSupermarket transactions leave a digital footprint which offers insight into dietary habits. Use of transactions in nutrition research has increased, but these data are rarely validated. The STRIDE (Supermarket Transaction Records In Dietary Evaluation) study compares dietary estimates from supermarket transactions with self-reported intake from an online Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Objectives & ApproachWorking with a large UK supermarket, loyalty card customers were recruited to one of four waves (accounting for seasonal dietary variation). Participants completed an online FFQ and consented to sharing their transaction records for one year during the study, and one year prior. The Bland-Altman method was used to calculate agreement and limits of agreement between transactions and intake for daily energy, sugar, total fat, saturated fat, protein and sodium (absolute and energy-adjusted). Relevance to Digital FootprintsSupermarket transactions are a form of digital footprints data with advantages over survey methods, with regards scalability and objectivity, for monitoring population-level diets. Results1,788 participants from four UK regions gave consent. 686 participants who completed the FFQ and made purchases during the same period, were included for analysis. Participants were mostly female (72%), with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13). A regression equation for agreement is presented for estimating intake from purchases. Agreement for absolute measures was poor overall, but higher for single-person households and households reporting a higher proportion of total food purchases from the study retailer. Agreement was stronger for energy-adjusted nutrient estimates, particularly fat, with purchase records under-estimating the proportion of total energy intake from fat by just 2%. Conclusions & ImplicationsThe STRIDE study found that household purchases from a single retailer were a poor proxy for individual-level nutrient intakes. However, close agreement on average energy-adjusted estimates suggests purchases are a good indicator of dietary composition. Supermarket transactions have utility for population dietary assessment, ecological studies, and identifying intervention targets based on dietary patterns. Digital footprint data from transactions can contribute to the design and monitoring of national and local-level interventions.
膳食评价中的超市交易记录- STRIDE验证研究。
介绍,超市交易留下的数字足迹可以让人们了解饮食习惯。在营养研究中对交易的使用有所增加,但这些数据很少得到验证。STRIDE(饮食评估中的超市交易记录)研究比较了超市交易的饮食估计与在线食物频率问卷(FFQ)中自我报告的摄入量。目标,方法与英国一家大型超市合作,将会员卡顾客招募到四组(考虑到季节性饮食变化)中的一组。参与者完成了一份在线FFQ,并同意在研究期间和研究前一年分享他们的交易记录。使用Bland-Altman方法计算每日能量、糖、总脂肪、饱和脂肪、蛋白质和钠(绝对和能量调整)的交易与摄入量之间的一致性和一致性限制。与数字足迹相关超市交易是数字足迹数据的一种形式,在可扩展性和客观性方面优于调查方法,用于监测人口水平的饮食。 结果来自英国四个地区的1788名参与者表示同意。686名完成FFQ并在同一时期购物的参与者被纳入分析。参与者大多为女性(72%),平均年龄为56岁(SD 13)。提出了一个协议回归方程,用于估算购买所得。总体而言,绝对衡量标准的一致性很差,但对于单身家庭和从研究零售商处购买食品的比例较高的家庭来说,一致性更高。对于能量调整后的营养估计,尤其是脂肪,一致性更强,购买记录低估了脂肪总能量摄入的比例,仅为2%。结论,STRIDE的研究发现,家庭从单一零售商处购买的食物不能很好地代表个人水平的营养摄入量。然而,在平均能量调整估计上的接近一致表明,购买是饮食构成的良好指标。超市交易对人口饮食评估、生态研究和确定基于饮食模式的干预目标具有实用价值。来自交易的数字足迹数据有助于设计和监测国家和地方一级的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信