Applicants’ Faith in Recruiters’ Intuition Predicts Process Favorability for the Unstructured Employment Interview

Q2 Psychology
Samantha Sinclair
{"title":"Applicants’ Faith in Recruiters’ Intuition Predicts Process Favorability for the Unstructured Employment Interview","authors":"Samantha Sinclair","doi":"10.16993/sjwop.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unstructured employment interview is one of the most popular selection tools among employers and applicants alike. Although past research has shed light on some explanations for practitioners’ preferences for unstructured methods, less is known about the reasons for their popularity among applicants. One reason might be that applicants overestimate recruiters’ intuitive abilities to make judgments about applicant characteristics based on resumes and interviews. The results of this study (N = 345) suggest that recruiters are perceived as much better than laypeople at making judgments about applicants based on resume screening and interviews, and that faith in recruiters’ intuition predicts process favorability for unstructured employment interviews. Moreover, this association remained significant when accounting for attitudes to structured interviews, perceived recruiter expertise, and attitudes to holistic versus mechanic methods in general. The results suggest that overestimation of recruiters’ intuitive expertise may help explain why many people prefer unstructured selection methods.","PeriodicalId":31182,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unstructured employment interview is one of the most popular selection tools among employers and applicants alike. Although past research has shed light on some explanations for practitioners’ preferences for unstructured methods, less is known about the reasons for their popularity among applicants. One reason might be that applicants overestimate recruiters’ intuitive abilities to make judgments about applicant characteristics based on resumes and interviews. The results of this study (N = 345) suggest that recruiters are perceived as much better than laypeople at making judgments about applicants based on resume screening and interviews, and that faith in recruiters’ intuition predicts process favorability for unstructured employment interviews. Moreover, this association remained significant when accounting for attitudes to structured interviews, perceived recruiter expertise, and attitudes to holistic versus mechanic methods in general. The results suggest that overestimation of recruiters’ intuitive expertise may help explain why many people prefer unstructured selection methods.
Applicants&,对招聘人员的信任直觉预测非结构化面试的过程偏好
非结构化的面试是雇主和求职者中最受欢迎的选择工具之一。尽管过去的研究已经揭示了从业者对非结构化方法的偏好的一些解释,但对于他们在申请人中受欢迎的原因却知之甚少。其中一个原因可能是求职者高估了招聘人员根据简历和面试对求职者特征做出判断的直觉能力。这项研究的结果(N = 345)表明,在根据简历筛选和面试对求职者做出判断方面,招聘人员被认为比非专业人士做得更好,而对招聘人员直觉的信任预示着非结构化面试的流程偏好。此外,当考虑到对结构化面试的态度、对招聘人员专业知识的认知以及对整体方法与机械方法的态度时,这种联系仍然很重要。结果表明,高估招聘人员的直觉能力可能有助于解释为什么许多人更喜欢非结构化的选择方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology Psychology-Psychology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信