Justification of temporary deviations from the standardized indicators of drinking water quality

Q4 Medicine
Daniil S. Isaev, Gennadiy B. Yeremin, Natal’ya A. Mozzhuhina, Xenia A. Gribowa, Aleks A. Stepanyan, Roman V. Buzinov
{"title":"Justification of temporary deviations from the standardized indicators of drinking water quality","authors":"Daniil S. Isaev, Gennadiy B. Yeremin, Natal’ya A. Mozzhuhina, Xenia A. Gribowa, Aleks A. Stepanyan, Roman V. Buzinov","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-8-868-875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the absence of a threat to health should be confirmed through a risk assessment, which is associated with methodological difficulties.
 Materials and methods. Health risk assessment projects from drinking water consumption of centralized drinking and household water supply systems in two settlements. The results of laboratory studies of drinking water quality using descriptive statistics methods are analyzed. The health risk assessment was carried out in accordance with the current guidelines G 2.1.10.1920–04.
 Results. According to the results of laboratory studies, it was found that the quality of drinking water before being supplied to the distribution network of settlement No. 1 didn`t meet the requirements of hygienic standards in terms of total hardness and strontium, settlement No. 2 – in terms of «total hardness», «dry residue», «magnesium», «bromine», «boron», while all these indicators, with the exception of total hardness exceeded the MPC by no more than an error of the determination method. In this regard, temporary deviations were justified only for the «total hardness». Non-carcinogenic risk assessment showed that the values of the hazard coefficients corresponded to the permissible level. The levels of the total carcinogenic risk by consumption of the drinking water throughout whole life and for 7 years correspond to the upper limit of acceptable risk. 
 Limitations. The limitation was the number of laboratory test protocols selected for analysis – over a 3-year period. In addition, the limitation was the inability to evaluate the full list of indicators from the point of view of risk assessment, as well as the probabilistic nature of the results obtained.
 Conclusion. To justify temporary deviations in drinking water quality in terms of «total hardness», it is necessary to conduct a complete study of the concentrations of cations forming the «total hardness» indicator – magnesium, calcium, strontium, and barium using a health risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":12550,"journal":{"name":"Gigiena i sanitariia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gigiena i sanitariia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-8-868-875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the absence of a threat to health should be confirmed through a risk assessment, which is associated with methodological difficulties. Materials and methods. Health risk assessment projects from drinking water consumption of centralized drinking and household water supply systems in two settlements. The results of laboratory studies of drinking water quality using descriptive statistics methods are analyzed. The health risk assessment was carried out in accordance with the current guidelines G 2.1.10.1920–04. Results. According to the results of laboratory studies, it was found that the quality of drinking water before being supplied to the distribution network of settlement No. 1 didn`t meet the requirements of hygienic standards in terms of total hardness and strontium, settlement No. 2 – in terms of «total hardness», «dry residue», «magnesium», «bromine», «boron», while all these indicators, with the exception of total hardness exceeded the MPC by no more than an error of the determination method. In this regard, temporary deviations were justified only for the «total hardness». Non-carcinogenic risk assessment showed that the values of the hazard coefficients corresponded to the permissible level. The levels of the total carcinogenic risk by consumption of the drinking water throughout whole life and for 7 years correspond to the upper limit of acceptable risk. Limitations. The limitation was the number of laboratory test protocols selected for analysis – over a 3-year period. In addition, the limitation was the inability to evaluate the full list of indicators from the point of view of risk assessment, as well as the probabilistic nature of the results obtained. Conclusion. To justify temporary deviations in drinking water quality in terms of «total hardness», it is necessary to conduct a complete study of the concentrations of cations forming the «total hardness» indicator – magnesium, calcium, strontium, and barium using a health risk assessment.
暂时偏离饮用水质量标准化指标的理由
应通过风险评估确认不存在对健康的威胁,这与方法上的困难有关。材料和方法。两个居民点集中饮水和家庭供水系统的饮用水消费健康风险评价项目。用描述统计方法对饮用水水质的实验室研究结果进行了分析。健康风险评估是根据现行准则G 2.1.10.1920-04 . 进行的;结果。根据实验室的研究结果,发现1号沉降在供给配网前的饮用水质量在总硬度和锶方面不符合卫生标准的要求,2号沉降在“总硬度”、“干残留物”、“镁”、“溴”、“硼”等指标均不符合卫生标准的要求,而除总硬度外,所有这些指标都超过了MPC的测定方法误差不超过一个。在这方面,暂时的偏差只适用于“总硬度”。非致癌性风险评估表明,危害系数值符合允许水平。在整个生命周期和连续7年饮用该饮用水的总致癌风险水平符合可接受风险上限。& # x0D;的局限性。限制是选择用于分析的实验室测试方案的数量-超过3年的时间。此外,其局限性在于无法从风险评估的角度评价全部指标清单,以及所获得结果的概率性质。 结论。为了证明饮用水质量在“总硬度”方面的暂时偏差是合理的,有必要利用健康风险评估对构成“总硬度”指标的阳离子——镁、钙、锶和钡的浓度进行全面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gigiena i sanitariia
Gigiena i sanitariia Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信