Public understandings of welfare and the economy: Who knows what and does it relate to political attitudes?

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Jan Eichhorn, Daniel Kenealy, Hayley Bennett
{"title":"Public understandings of welfare and the economy: Who knows what and does it relate to political attitudes?","authors":"Jan Eichhorn, Daniel Kenealy, Hayley Bennett","doi":"10.1111/spol.12963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous studies have revealed significant gaps in the UK public's knowledge about the welfare state and the economy. However, we know little about which groups of the population know more, and which less. Drawing on survey evidence, we confirm that many people overstimate both the size of unemployment provision and levels of benefit fraud, and also make mistakes when answering factual questions about finance, employment rights, and benefit entitlements. While men, older people and university degree holders demonstrate slightly better knowledge on average, substantial differences appear when we distinguish specific domains of knowledge. For example, women know more about benefits, but men more about finance. We argue that understanding patterns of economic knowledge requires more complex engagement than has been undertaken to date. This is important because we find that knowledge is linked to political attitudes, with those who are more supportive of the welfare state – and those who tend to emphasise the government's role in the delivery of public services – more likely to demonstrate greater levels of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":47858,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies have revealed significant gaps in the UK public's knowledge about the welfare state and the economy. However, we know little about which groups of the population know more, and which less. Drawing on survey evidence, we confirm that many people overstimate both the size of unemployment provision and levels of benefit fraud, and also make mistakes when answering factual questions about finance, employment rights, and benefit entitlements. While men, older people and university degree holders demonstrate slightly better knowledge on average, substantial differences appear when we distinguish specific domains of knowledge. For example, women know more about benefits, but men more about finance. We argue that understanding patterns of economic knowledge requires more complex engagement than has been undertaken to date. This is important because we find that knowledge is linked to political attitudes, with those who are more supportive of the welfare state – and those who tend to emphasise the government's role in the delivery of public services – more likely to demonstrate greater levels of knowledge.
公众对福利和经济的理解:谁知道什么,它与政治态度有关吗?
先前的研究表明,英国公众对福利国家和经济的认识存在显著差距。然而,我们对人群中哪些群体知道得更多,哪些群体知道得更少知之甚少。根据调查证据,我们确认许多人高估了失业补助的规模和福利欺诈的程度,并且在回答有关金融、就业权利和福利权利的事实问题时也会犯错误。虽然男性、老年人和大学学历的人平均表现出稍好的知识水平,但当我们区分特定的知识领域时,就会出现实质性的差异。例如,女性更了解福利,而男性更了解财务。我们认为,理解经济知识的模式需要比迄今为止更复杂的参与。这很重要,因为我们发现知识与政治态度有关,那些更支持福利国家的人——以及那些倾向于强调政府在提供公共服务中的作用的人——更有可能展示出更高水平的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Social Policy & Administration is the longest established journal in its field. Whilst remaining faithful to its tradition in academic excellence, the journal also seeks to engender debate about topical and controversial issues. Typical numbers contain papers clustered around a theme. The journal is international in scope. Quality contributions are received from scholars world-wide and cover social policy issues not only in Europe but in the USA, Canada, Australia and Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信