The Understanding and Stability of Insertion Layers in Thread Lift

{"title":"The Understanding and Stability of Insertion Layers in Thread Lift","authors":"","doi":"10.29011/2575-9760.001903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thread lifting is popular for addressing the loss of facial skin elasticity and reducing wrinkles. However, the incidence of complications varies with the practitioner’s competence, the characteristics of materials used, and variations in procedural techniques. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of thread lifting procedures based on the insertion layer and suture length to propose different techniques tailored to the objective of thread lifting. We assessed the major complications observed in individuals who underwent thread lifting to evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of the procedure. From March 2022 to January 2023, we performed thread lifting using Vxil threads with uni-and multi-layer insertion on 24 patients, and evaluated the outcomes and complications. The mean age of the patients was 37.5 (range 24-63) years, and the mean follow-up period was 199 (range 188-207) days. An average of 4.4 long lines (2-8 lines) and 12.6 middle lines (8-16 lines) were used. The degree of pulling after insertion varied with the technique and length of threads. For uni-layer insertions, a greater amount of tissue displacement was observed. Displacement was also greater using long lines than using middle lines. The global aesthetic improvement scale score increased, indicating increased satisfaction, at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Reported complications included edema, pain, foreign body sensation, bruising, asymmetry, and temporary sinking. Clinicians need to choose the appropriate thread and procedure technique based on their research and efforts to minimize complications and boost patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":92684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgery (Lisle, IL)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgery (Lisle, IL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-9760.001903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thread lifting is popular for addressing the loss of facial skin elasticity and reducing wrinkles. However, the incidence of complications varies with the practitioner’s competence, the characteristics of materials used, and variations in procedural techniques. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of thread lifting procedures based on the insertion layer and suture length to propose different techniques tailored to the objective of thread lifting. We assessed the major complications observed in individuals who underwent thread lifting to evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of the procedure. From March 2022 to January 2023, we performed thread lifting using Vxil threads with uni-and multi-layer insertion on 24 patients, and evaluated the outcomes and complications. The mean age of the patients was 37.5 (range 24-63) years, and the mean follow-up period was 199 (range 188-207) days. An average of 4.4 long lines (2-8 lines) and 12.6 middle lines (8-16 lines) were used. The degree of pulling after insertion varied with the technique and length of threads. For uni-layer insertions, a greater amount of tissue displacement was observed. Displacement was also greater using long lines than using middle lines. The global aesthetic improvement scale score increased, indicating increased satisfaction, at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Reported complications included edema, pain, foreign body sensation, bruising, asymmetry, and temporary sinking. Clinicians need to choose the appropriate thread and procedure technique based on their research and efforts to minimize complications and boost patient satisfaction.
螺纹提升中插入层的理解与稳定性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信