The Political Limits and Possibilities of the Eucharist: A Theatrical Intervention

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Liam Miller
{"title":"The Political Limits and Possibilities of the Eucharist: A Theatrical Intervention","authors":"Liam Miller","doi":"10.1177/09539468231206275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I build on recent critiques of theological accounts of the eucharistic which overextend the practice's potential to form a Christian ethic and alternative polis. In analysing these critiques, often drawing on historical and contemporary cases of Christian malformation and its basis in liturgical practice, I suggest a greater distinction is needed between the practice's ability to raise political consciousness and the necessity of separate material political action. I approach this reconfiguration through appeal to debates on the political efficacy and responsibility of art, focusing in particular on contemporary German theatre director, Thomas Ostermeier and his influential production of Henrik Ibsen's An Enemy of the People. Ostermeier distinguishes theatrical performance from material politics, while still demonstrating how theatre might enact a repoliticisation, provoking audiences to think beyond the story on stage to the world beyond where they live and try to act. Connecting the theological critiques with Ostermeier's work, I offer three areas in which a reconfiguration of the relationship between the Eucharist and Christian ethics might focus: depristinising in practice, disrupting catharsis, and being sent. These theatrical interventions allow for clearer recognition of the practice's ethical and political limits and potential.","PeriodicalId":43593,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Christian Ethics","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Christian Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468231206275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article I build on recent critiques of theological accounts of the eucharistic which overextend the practice's potential to form a Christian ethic and alternative polis. In analysing these critiques, often drawing on historical and contemporary cases of Christian malformation and its basis in liturgical practice, I suggest a greater distinction is needed between the practice's ability to raise political consciousness and the necessity of separate material political action. I approach this reconfiguration through appeal to debates on the political efficacy and responsibility of art, focusing in particular on contemporary German theatre director, Thomas Ostermeier and his influential production of Henrik Ibsen's An Enemy of the People. Ostermeier distinguishes theatrical performance from material politics, while still demonstrating how theatre might enact a repoliticisation, provoking audiences to think beyond the story on stage to the world beyond where they live and try to act. Connecting the theological critiques with Ostermeier's work, I offer three areas in which a reconfiguration of the relationship between the Eucharist and Christian ethics might focus: depristinising in practice, disrupting catharsis, and being sent. These theatrical interventions allow for clearer recognition of the practice's ethical and political limits and potential.
圣餐礼的政治限制和可能性:戏剧干预
在这篇文章中,我以最近对圣餐的神学评论为基础,这些评论过度扩展了圣餐实践形成基督教伦理和替代城邦的潜力。在分析这些批评时,我经常引用历史和当代基督教畸形的案例及其在礼仪实践中的基础,我认为需要在实践提高政治意识的能力和单独的物质政治行动的必要性之间进行更大的区分。我通过对艺术的政治效力和责任的辩论来进行这种重新配置,特别关注当代德国戏剧导演托马斯·奥斯特迈尔和他颇具影响力的亨里克·易卜生的《人民的敌人》。奥斯特梅尔将戏剧表演与物质政治区分开来,同时仍然展示了戏剧如何实施再政治化,激发观众超越舞台上的故事思考他们生活的世界,并试图采取行动。将神学批评与奥斯特梅尔的作品联系起来,我提出了圣餐与基督教伦理之间关系重构可能关注的三个领域:在实践中剥夺,破坏宣泄,以及被送去。这些戏剧性的干预允许更清楚地认识到实践的道德和政治限制和潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信