Nature of Multiple Intelligences and Perceptual Learning Styles of Prospective Teachers in West Bengal, India

Q4 Health Professions
Suvendu Ray, Mousumi Halder, Deb Prasad Sikdar
{"title":"Nature of Multiple Intelligences and Perceptual Learning Styles of Prospective Teachers in West Bengal, India","authors":"Suvendu Ray, Mousumi Halder, Deb Prasad Sikdar","doi":"10.52403/ijrr.20231018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of the students' various learning styles and levels of intelligence, different pupils learn in different ways. This study analyses the multiple intelligences and learning styles of 410 prospective teachers from teacher training institutes in West Bengal, India. During the data collection procedure, researchers used a random sampling technique. It indicates that there are differences between women and men in particular forms of intelligence (spatial, musical, interpersonal, and intrapersonal), which tend to be disregarded in our conventional teacher education programmes. The verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, and bodily-kinesthetic categories of intelligence—which are frequently acquired through curriculum—do not exhibit statistically significant gender differences. The sensation-intuition dimension is the only one where there are gender differences in learning style. The sole conclusion that can be drawn from these findings is that prospective teachers' preferred learning styles are merely disregarded during the teaching-learning process, which should include techniques for nurturing them. The findings of this study imply that incorporating teaching methods that take into account multiple intelligences and learning styles may have a positive impact on students' academic performance. Comparably, while deciding which students to accept for a given course, academic institutions must take multiple intelligences into consideration as well. Keywords: Multiple Intelligences, Learning Styles, Prospective Teachers","PeriodicalId":13809,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20231018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of the students' various learning styles and levels of intelligence, different pupils learn in different ways. This study analyses the multiple intelligences and learning styles of 410 prospective teachers from teacher training institutes in West Bengal, India. During the data collection procedure, researchers used a random sampling technique. It indicates that there are differences between women and men in particular forms of intelligence (spatial, musical, interpersonal, and intrapersonal), which tend to be disregarded in our conventional teacher education programmes. The verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, and bodily-kinesthetic categories of intelligence—which are frequently acquired through curriculum—do not exhibit statistically significant gender differences. The sensation-intuition dimension is the only one where there are gender differences in learning style. The sole conclusion that can be drawn from these findings is that prospective teachers' preferred learning styles are merely disregarded during the teaching-learning process, which should include techniques for nurturing them. The findings of this study imply that incorporating teaching methods that take into account multiple intelligences and learning styles may have a positive impact on students' academic performance. Comparably, while deciding which students to accept for a given course, academic institutions must take multiple intelligences into consideration as well. Keywords: Multiple Intelligences, Learning Styles, Prospective Teachers
印度西孟加拉邦准教师的多元智能本质与感性学习风格
根据学生不同的学习方式和智力水平,不同的学生有不同的学习方式。本研究分析了来自印度西孟加拉邦教师培训机构的410名准教师的多元智能和学习方式。在数据收集过程中,研究人员采用了随机抽样技术。这表明男女之间在特定形式的智力(空间、音乐、人际关系和内省)上存在差异,而这在我们传统的教师教育计划中往往被忽视。语言-语言、逻辑-数学和身体-动觉的智力类别——这些通常是通过课程获得的——在统计上没有显著的性别差异。感觉-直觉维度是唯一一个在学习方式上存在性别差异的维度。从这些发现中可以得出的唯一结论是,在教与学的过程中,未来教师喜欢的学习方式只是被忽视了,这应该包括培养他们的技术。本研究的结果表明,结合考虑多元智能和学习方式的教学方法可能对学生的学习成绩产生积极影响。相比之下,在决定某门课程录取哪些学生时,学术机构也必须考虑到多元智能。关键词:多元智能,学习方式,准教师
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Current Research and Review
International Journal of Current Research and Review Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信