Information provision by non-government actors in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme: A key market stewardship function in social care quasi-markets

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Celia Green, Eleanor Malbon, Gemma Carey
{"title":"Information provision by non-government actors in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme: A key market stewardship function in social care quasi-markets","authors":"Celia Green,&nbsp;Eleanor Malbon,&nbsp;Gemma Carey","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The use of quasi-markets for the delivery of social care continues to grow internationally. This has presented considerable challenges regarding governance and stewardship of these markets, to ensure they meet policy goals. To date, both scholarship and practice on quasi-market stewardship have mainly focused on the role of government. However, non-government actors can also play important stewardship roles. For effective stewardship, there needs to be integration between government and non-government actors in the system, not just a top-down approach. This paper explores the stewardship role of non-government actors in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) with a focus on the role of information provision as a key market stewardship function. Findings show non-government information providers play important stewardship roles that increase choice and control for citizens, enhance market sufficiency, diversity, and innovation, and support other actors in the system. We argue for a shift in the conception of market stewardship as primarily a government activity and recommend the market stewardship actions of non-government actors be better acknowledged, funded, and ‘joined up’ with the market stewardship role of government to enable social care quasi-markets to operate more effectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Information provision by non-government actors is a key market stewardship function in social care quasi-markets.</li>\n \n <li>Market stewardship needs to be the responsibility of a much greater range of actors than government alone.</li>\n \n <li>A framework for ‘distributed stewardship’ can help join up the stewardship actions of non-government actors with those of government to support information flows for more effective stewardship.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12606","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of quasi-markets for the delivery of social care continues to grow internationally. This has presented considerable challenges regarding governance and stewardship of these markets, to ensure they meet policy goals. To date, both scholarship and practice on quasi-market stewardship have mainly focused on the role of government. However, non-government actors can also play important stewardship roles. For effective stewardship, there needs to be integration between government and non-government actors in the system, not just a top-down approach. This paper explores the stewardship role of non-government actors in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) with a focus on the role of information provision as a key market stewardship function. Findings show non-government information providers play important stewardship roles that increase choice and control for citizens, enhance market sufficiency, diversity, and innovation, and support other actors in the system. We argue for a shift in the conception of market stewardship as primarily a government activity and recommend the market stewardship actions of non-government actors be better acknowledged, funded, and ‘joined up’ with the market stewardship role of government to enable social care quasi-markets to operate more effectively.

Points for practitioners

  • Information provision by non-government actors is a key market stewardship function in social care quasi-markets.
  • Market stewardship needs to be the responsibility of a much greater range of actors than government alone.
  • A framework for ‘distributed stewardship’ can help join up the stewardship actions of non-government actors with those of government to support information flows for more effective stewardship.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划中非政府行为者提供的信息:社会护理准市场中的关键市场管理功能
在国际上,利用准市场提供社会保健的情况继续增加。这给这些市场的治理和管理带来了相当大的挑战,以确保它们实现政策目标。迄今为止,准市场管理的学术研究和实践主要集中在政府的作用上。然而,非政府行为者也可以发挥重要的管理作用。为了有效的管理,系统中需要政府和非政府行为体之间的整合,而不仅仅是自上而下的方法。本文探讨了非政府行为体在澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划(NDIS)中的管理作用,重点关注信息提供作为关键市场管理功能的作用。研究结果表明,非政府信息提供者发挥着重要的管理作用,增加了公民的选择和控制,增强了市场充分性、多样性和创新,并支持系统中的其他参与者。我们主张转变市场管理主要是政府活动的概念,并建议更好地承认、资助非政府行动者的市场管理行动,并将其与政府的市场管理角色“联合”起来,以使社会关怀准市场更有效地运作。在社会关怀准市场中,非政府行为体提供信息是一项关键的市场管理功能。市场管理需要更多参与者的责任,而不仅仅是政府。“分布式管理”框架可以帮助将非政府行为体的管理行动与政府行为体的管理行动联合起来,支持信息流,以实现更有效的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信