Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane by Mark Asquith (review)

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Scott Pearce
{"title":"Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane by Mark Asquith (review)","authors":"Scott Pearce","doi":"10.1353/wal.2023.a904153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane by Mark Asquith Scott Pearce Asquith, Mark. Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 243 pp. Hardcover, $120; e-book, $108. Mark Asquith sees that getting lost in the West, or perhaps feeling that the West is lost, is an easy thing to do because a notion of what the West is has become uncertain and convoluted. The West, as Asquith contends, is commonly seen as a loosely defined geographical space, or a political theory, or a romantic escape, or a set of tacky images, or something of an assemblage of these. Thus, “for writers seeking to engage with the West, this identity problem is exacerbated by the long shadow cast by the Western” (7). As the subtitle suggests, Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane, Asquith is primarily concerned with four writers, John Williams, Cormac McCarthy, Annie Proulx, and Thomas McGuane, and the ways in which the West remains alive in their works and the works of others. The four chapters in this book examine how each of the four writers work to demythologize many of the classical Western genre tropes. This begins with John Williams’s Butcher’s Crossing. Asquith’s work is timely given the upcoming film adaptation of Butcher’s Crossing and the uncertainty as to what that film will do with Williams’s novel. Asquith provides astute and engaging analysis and writes in such a way that this book is sure to appeal to the academic crowd and equally to those readers interested in the changing nature of the Western. In particular, Asquith discusses Williams’s work in relation to the unfettered consumption of flora and fauna and the gendered binaries that subjugate and limit social and emotional mobility. Yet, it is, conversely, as Asquith acknowledges, these very acts that have driven economic development in the West. The second chapter focuses on Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian and the Border Trilogy. Asquith brings a new reading to [End Page 163] McCarthy’s work, a difficult task given the plethora of articles, books, and book chapters focused on McCarthy’s body of work. Asquith finds parallels to aspects of McCarthy’s characterization and narrative in a broad range of texts, from Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness to Lonely are the Brave (directed by David Miller, 1962) to Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. Yet, Asquith never loses sight of the West and the focus on masculine performance in the Border Trilogy is particularly impressive. There is, seemingly, for Asquith, an inescapable West that persists in McCarthy’s work, and the work of the other writers, one that is frightening and alluring, both in its depictions and its critique of the varied constructs attached to the West. In writing about Annie Proulx, Asquith contends that “Proulx’s West remains dangerous because it is surreal; it is a potent mixture of mythology and exoticism that is both easy to idealize and fatal to underestimate” (97). And, also, that Proulx’s work gives “voice to the silent victims of a false mythology” (98). This chapter was most striking and covers many of Proulx’s short stories as well as That Old Ace in the Hole. For Asquith, Proulx’s characters are caught between an allegiance of sorts to the past and a present that has little space for them. There is a James Joyce–type paralysis for characters in Proulx’s work that Asquith again identifies as most profoundly expressed around the anxiety of incomplete masculine performance. Asquith’s examination of Thomas McGuane’s work, predominately the Deadrock novels, is terrific. Asquith again considers masculine performance but finds that in McGuane’s work there is a comical self-consciousness in the protagonists. For Asquith, there is often a determination in McGuane’s male protagonists to embody the classical Hollywood cowboy, but the Deadrock town provides limited opportunities for such performance, and they become poor facsimiles. There is, as Asquith argues, an allure in the cowboy identity, in that masculine performance so repeatedly projected onto film and TV screens, which extends beyond a...","PeriodicalId":23875,"journal":{"name":"Western American Literature","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western American Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wal.2023.a904153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane by Mark Asquith Scott Pearce Asquith, Mark. Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 243 pp. Hardcover, $120; e-book, $108. Mark Asquith sees that getting lost in the West, or perhaps feeling that the West is lost, is an easy thing to do because a notion of what the West is has become uncertain and convoluted. The West, as Asquith contends, is commonly seen as a loosely defined geographical space, or a political theory, or a romantic escape, or a set of tacky images, or something of an assemblage of these. Thus, “for writers seeking to engage with the West, this identity problem is exacerbated by the long shadow cast by the Western” (7). As the subtitle suggests, Lost in the New West: Reading Williams, McCarthy, Proulx and McGuane, Asquith is primarily concerned with four writers, John Williams, Cormac McCarthy, Annie Proulx, and Thomas McGuane, and the ways in which the West remains alive in their works and the works of others. The four chapters in this book examine how each of the four writers work to demythologize many of the classical Western genre tropes. This begins with John Williams’s Butcher’s Crossing. Asquith’s work is timely given the upcoming film adaptation of Butcher’s Crossing and the uncertainty as to what that film will do with Williams’s novel. Asquith provides astute and engaging analysis and writes in such a way that this book is sure to appeal to the academic crowd and equally to those readers interested in the changing nature of the Western. In particular, Asquith discusses Williams’s work in relation to the unfettered consumption of flora and fauna and the gendered binaries that subjugate and limit social and emotional mobility. Yet, it is, conversely, as Asquith acknowledges, these very acts that have driven economic development in the West. The second chapter focuses on Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian and the Border Trilogy. Asquith brings a new reading to [End Page 163] McCarthy’s work, a difficult task given the plethora of articles, books, and book chapters focused on McCarthy’s body of work. Asquith finds parallels to aspects of McCarthy’s characterization and narrative in a broad range of texts, from Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness to Lonely are the Brave (directed by David Miller, 1962) to Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. Yet, Asquith never loses sight of the West and the focus on masculine performance in the Border Trilogy is particularly impressive. There is, seemingly, for Asquith, an inescapable West that persists in McCarthy’s work, and the work of the other writers, one that is frightening and alluring, both in its depictions and its critique of the varied constructs attached to the West. In writing about Annie Proulx, Asquith contends that “Proulx’s West remains dangerous because it is surreal; it is a potent mixture of mythology and exoticism that is both easy to idealize and fatal to underestimate” (97). And, also, that Proulx’s work gives “voice to the silent victims of a false mythology” (98). This chapter was most striking and covers many of Proulx’s short stories as well as That Old Ace in the Hole. For Asquith, Proulx’s characters are caught between an allegiance of sorts to the past and a present that has little space for them. There is a James Joyce–type paralysis for characters in Proulx’s work that Asquith again identifies as most profoundly expressed around the anxiety of incomplete masculine performance. Asquith’s examination of Thomas McGuane’s work, predominately the Deadrock novels, is terrific. Asquith again considers masculine performance but finds that in McGuane’s work there is a comical self-consciousness in the protagonists. For Asquith, there is often a determination in McGuane’s male protagonists to embody the classical Hollywood cowboy, but the Deadrock town provides limited opportunities for such performance, and they become poor facsimiles. There is, as Asquith argues, an allure in the cowboy identity, in that masculine performance so repeatedly projected onto film and TV screens, which extends beyond a...
迷失在新西部:阅读马克·阿斯奎斯的《威廉姆斯、麦卡锡、普罗克斯和麦瓜恩》(书评)
书评:《迷失在新西部:阅读威廉姆斯、麦卡锡、普罗克斯和麦瓜恩》作者:马克·阿斯奎斯。《迷失在新西部:阅读威廉姆斯、麦卡锡、普罗克斯和麦瓜恩》。纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里学术出版社,2021。243页,精装版,120美元;电子书,108美元。马克·阿斯奎斯(Mark Asquith)认为,在西方迷失,或者感觉西方迷失,是一件很容易的事情,因为西方的概念已经变得不确定和复杂。正如阿斯奎斯所主张的那样,西方通常被视为一个定义松散的地理空间,或一种政治理论,或一种浪漫的逃避,或一组俗气的形象,或这些的集合体。因此,“对于寻求与西方接触的作家来说,这种身份认同问题因西方的长期阴影而加剧”(7)。正如副标题所示,《迷失在新西部:阅读威廉姆斯、麦卡锡、普罗克斯和麦瓜恩》,阿斯奎斯主要关注四位作家,约翰·威廉姆斯、科马克·麦卡锡、安妮·普罗克斯和托马斯·麦瓜恩,以及西方在他们和其他人的作品中保持活力的方式。本书的四章研究了四位作家是如何将许多经典的西方体裁比喻去神话化的。这从约翰·威廉姆斯的《屠夫的十字路口》开始。考虑到即将上映的《屠夫的十字路口》改编电影,以及这部电影将如何处理威廉姆斯的小说的不确定性,阿斯奎斯的作品是及时的。阿斯奎斯提供了敏锐而引人入胜的分析,并以这样一种方式写作,这本书肯定会吸引学术人群,同样也会吸引那些对西方变化的本质感兴趣的读者。阿斯奎斯特别讨论了威廉姆斯的作品与无拘无束地消费动植物以及征服和限制社会和情感流动性的性别二元性的关系。然而,正如阿斯奎斯所承认的,恰恰相反,正是这些行为推动了西方的经济发展。第二章主要介绍科马克·麦卡锡的《血子午线》和《边界三部曲》。阿斯奎斯给麦卡锡的作品带来了一种新的解读,这是一项艰巨的任务,因为有大量的文章、书籍和书籍章节都集中在麦卡锡的作品上。阿斯奎斯发现,从约瑟夫·康拉德的《黑暗之心》到大卫·米勒导演的《孤独的勇士》(1962年),再到塞缪尔·贝克特的《等待戈多》,麦卡锡的人物塑造和叙事在很多文本中都有相似之处。然而,阿斯奎斯从未忽视西方,在《边境三部曲》中对男性表演的关注尤其令人印象深刻。在阿斯奎斯看来,麦卡锡的作品和其他作家的作品中似乎存在着一个无法逃避的西方,无论是在对西方的描绘还是对与西方相关的各种建构的批评中,都存在着一个既可怕又诱人的西方。在写安妮·普罗克斯时,阿斯奎斯认为“普罗克斯的西部仍然很危险,因为它是超现实的;它是神话和异国情调的有力混合,很容易理想化,低估则是致命的”(97)。而且,普罗克斯的作品也让“虚假神话中沉默的受害者发出了声音”(98)。这一章最引人注目,涵盖了普卢克斯的许多短篇小说以及《洞里的老王牌》。对于阿斯奎斯来说,普罗克斯笔下的人物陷入了对过去和现在的忠诚之间,而现在对他们来说几乎没有空间。在普罗克斯的作品中,人物有一种詹姆斯·乔伊斯式的麻痹,阿斯奎斯再次认为,这种麻痹最深刻地表达了对不完整的男性表演的焦虑。阿斯奎斯对托马斯·麦瓜恩的作品,主要是《死石》系列小说的研究非常出色。阿斯奎斯再次考虑了男性化的表演,但他发现,在麦瓜恩的作品中,主角们有一种滑稽的自我意识。对于阿斯奎斯来说,麦瓜恩的男主角们往往有一种体现经典好莱坞牛仔的决心,但死石镇为这种表现提供了有限的机会,他们变成了拙劣的摹本。正如阿斯奎斯所说,在牛仔的身份中,在电影和电视屏幕上反复出现的男性化表演中,有一种诱惑,这种诱惑超越了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western American Literature
Western American Literature LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信