Using state claims data to explore first-line antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory conditions—Minnesota, 2018–2019

Mari Freitas, Ashley Fell, Susan Gerbensky Klammer, Ruth Lynfield, Amanda Beaudoin
{"title":"Using state claims data to explore first-line antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory conditions—Minnesota, 2018–2019","authors":"Mari Freitas, Ashley Fell, Susan Gerbensky Klammer, Ruth Lynfield, Amanda Beaudoin","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nationally, >30% of all outpatient antibiotics are unnecessary or inappropriate, and only 52% of outpatients with sinusitis, otitis media, or pharyngitis receive recommended first-line antibiotics. The Minnesota All Payer Claims Database (MN APCD) collects medical claims, pharmacy claims, and eligibility files from private and public healthcare payers. We analyzed claims to describe overall and firstline antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis, adult acute sinusitis, and pediatric patients. Results: We analyzed 3,502,013 respiratory events from 1,612,501 members. Acute bronchitis accounted for 179,723 events (5.1%), acute sinusitis accounted for 236,901 adult events (10%), and otitis media accounted for 232,226 pediatric events (19%). Also, 73,385 bronchitis diagnoses (~40%) had no associated antibiotic. Antibiotics were associated with 199,445 adult sinusitis events (84.2%), of which 89,386 (44.8%) were firstline antibiotics, and 190,962 pediatric otitis media events (82.2%), of which 126,859 (66.4%) were firstline antibiotics. Common antibiotic classes used when a firstline drug was not selected were macrolides (28.9%) and tetracyclines (26.8%) for adult acute sinusitis and cephalosporins (61.4%) and macrolides (30.6%) for pediatric otitis media. Compared to the least vulnerable quartile, the most vulnerable social vulnerability index (SVI) quartile had lower odds of receiving firstline antibiotics for adult acute sinusitis if antibiotics were prescribed (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87–0.94) and higher odds of receiving firstline antibiotics for pediatric otitis media if antibiotics were prescribed (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12–1.21). Conclusions: Improvement is needed in avoiding antibiotics for acute bronchitis and selecting firstline drugs for sinusitis and otitis media. Additional analyses adjusting for demographic, geographic, and prescriber factors are planned to better understand differences in prescribing appropriateness among Minnesotans. Disclosures: None","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nationally, >30% of all outpatient antibiotics are unnecessary or inappropriate, and only 52% of outpatients with sinusitis, otitis media, or pharyngitis receive recommended first-line antibiotics. The Minnesota All Payer Claims Database (MN APCD) collects medical claims, pharmacy claims, and eligibility files from private and public healthcare payers. We analyzed claims to describe overall and firstline antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis, adult acute sinusitis, and pediatric patients. Results: We analyzed 3,502,013 respiratory events from 1,612,501 members. Acute bronchitis accounted for 179,723 events (5.1%), acute sinusitis accounted for 236,901 adult events (10%), and otitis media accounted for 232,226 pediatric events (19%). Also, 73,385 bronchitis diagnoses (~40%) had no associated antibiotic. Antibiotics were associated with 199,445 adult sinusitis events (84.2%), of which 89,386 (44.8%) were firstline antibiotics, and 190,962 pediatric otitis media events (82.2%), of which 126,859 (66.4%) were firstline antibiotics. Common antibiotic classes used when a firstline drug was not selected were macrolides (28.9%) and tetracyclines (26.8%) for adult acute sinusitis and cephalosporins (61.4%) and macrolides (30.6%) for pediatric otitis media. Compared to the least vulnerable quartile, the most vulnerable social vulnerability index (SVI) quartile had lower odds of receiving firstline antibiotics for adult acute sinusitis if antibiotics were prescribed (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87–0.94) and higher odds of receiving firstline antibiotics for pediatric otitis media if antibiotics were prescribed (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12–1.21). Conclusions: Improvement is needed in avoiding antibiotics for acute bronchitis and selecting firstline drugs for sinusitis and otitis media. Additional analyses adjusting for demographic, geographic, and prescriber factors are planned to better understand differences in prescribing appropriateness among Minnesotans. Disclosures: None
使用州索赔数据探索急性呼吸系统疾病的一线抗生素处方-明尼苏达州,2018-2019
背景:在全国范围内,30%的门诊抗生素是不必要或不适当的,只有52%的鼻窦炎、中耳炎或咽炎门诊患者接受了推荐的一线抗生素。明尼苏达州所有付款人索赔数据库(MN APCD)收集来自私人和公共医疗保健付款人的医疗索赔、药房索赔和资格文件。我们分析了急性支气管炎、成人急性鼻窦炎和儿科患者的总体和一线抗生素处方。结果:我们分析了来自1,612,501名成员的3,502,013例呼吸事件。急性支气管炎占179723例(5.1%),急性鼻窦炎占236901例(10%),小儿中耳炎占232226例(19%)。此外,73385例支气管炎诊断(约40%)未使用相关抗生素。成人鼻窦炎事件199,445例(84.2%)与抗生素相关,其中89,386例(44.8%)与一线抗生素相关;儿童中耳炎事件190,962例(82.2%)与一线抗生素相关,其中126,859例(66.4%)与一线抗生素相关。当没有选择一线药物时,常用的抗生素类别是大环内酯类(28.9%)和四环素类(26.8%)用于成人急性鼻窦炎,头孢菌素类(61.4%)和大环内酯类(30.6%)用于儿童中耳炎。与最不脆弱的四分位数相比,最脆弱的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)四分位数在处方抗生素治疗成人急性鼻窦炎时接受一线抗生素的几率较低(OR, 0.90;95% CI, 0.87-0.94),如果给儿童中耳炎开了抗生素,接受一线抗生素治疗的几率更高(OR, 1.16;95% ci, 1.12-1.21)。结论:急性支气管炎避免使用抗生素,鼻窦炎和中耳炎的一线药物选择有待改进。计划对人口统计、地理和处方因素进行额外的分析,以更好地了解明尼苏达州人在处方适宜性方面的差异。披露:没有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信