Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A Vora, L Al Tmimi, D Van Beersel, S Rex
{"title":"Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"A Vora, L Al Tmimi, D Van Beersel, S Rex","doi":"10.56126/74.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the association between right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science. We only included observational studies and randomized controlled trials in which, right ventricular function and pulmonary pressures were investigated, in adult patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcome was pulmonary embolism (PE). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Mean differences (MD) and unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled. Results: 21 studies were included in our systematic review for qualitative analysis, and eight of them qualified for quantitative analysis. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) over pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (TAPSE/PASP) ratio was significantly lower in non-survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = – 0.28 [–0.38, –0.17], p < 0.00001; I2: 61%, p < 0.08). TAPSE was significantly lower in non- survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = – 3.53 [–4.72, –2.33], p < 0.00001; I2: 77%, p < 0.0005). Lower TAPSE was associated with increased mortality (HR = 0.77 [0.63, 0.94], p < 0.010; I2: 77%, p = 0.01). PASP was significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = 9.14 [6.67, 11.61], p < 0.00001; I2: 37%, p=0.18). One study demonstrated a higher risk of mortality for lower TAPSE/PASP in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients and, one study showed that TAPSE/PASP was significantly associated with a higher risk of PE. Conclusion: COVID-19 non-survivors have a significantly worse RV-PA coupling as compared to survivors.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/74.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the association between right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science. We only included observational studies and randomized controlled trials in which, right ventricular function and pulmonary pressures were investigated, in adult patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcome was pulmonary embolism (PE). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Mean differences (MD) and unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled. Results: 21 studies were included in our systematic review for qualitative analysis, and eight of them qualified for quantitative analysis. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) over pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (TAPSE/PASP) ratio was significantly lower in non-survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = – 0.28 [–0.38, –0.17], p < 0.00001; I2: 61%, p < 0.08). TAPSE was significantly lower in non- survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = – 3.53 [–4.72, –2.33], p < 0.00001; I2: 77%, p < 0.0005). Lower TAPSE was associated with increased mortality (HR = 0.77 [0.63, 0.94], p < 0.010; I2: 77%, p = 0.01). PASP was significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = 9.14 [6.67, 11.61], p < 0.00001; I2: 37%, p=0.18). One study demonstrated a higher risk of mortality for lower TAPSE/PASP in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients and, one study showed that TAPSE/PASP was significantly associated with a higher risk of PE. Conclusion: COVID-19 non-survivors have a significantly worse RV-PA coupling as compared to survivors.
COVID-19患者的右心室-肺动脉耦合:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们评估了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)偶联与死亡率之间的关系。方法:使用MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science进行系统的文献检索。我们只纳入了观察性研究和随机对照试验,其中调查了COVID-19成年患者的右心室功能和肺动脉压。主要结局是死亡率。次要结局是肺栓塞(PE)。进行随机效应荟萃分析。汇总平均差异(MD)和未调整风险比(hr)。结果:我们的系统综述纳入了21项研究进行定性分析,其中8项研究符合定量分析的条件。三尖瓣环平面收缩偏移(TAPSE)比肺动脉收缩压(PASP) (TAPSE/PASP)比在非幸存者中显著低于幸存者(平均差异= - 0.28 [- 0.38,- 0.17],p <0.00001;I2: 61%, p <0.08)。非幸存者的TAPSE明显低于幸存者(平均差异= - 3.53 [- 4.72,- 2.33],p <0.00001;I2: 77%, p <0.0005)。较低的TAPSE与死亡率增加相关(HR = 0.77 [0.63, 0.94], p <0.010;I2: 77%, p = 0.01)。非幸存者的PASP明显高于幸存者(平均差异= 9.14 [6.67,11.61],p <0.00001;I2: 37%, p=0.18)。一项研究表明,在重症监护病房(ICU)和非ICU患者中,较低的TAPSE/PASP死亡率更高,一项研究表明,TAPSE/PASP与较高的PE风险显著相关。结论:与幸存者相比,COVID-19非幸存者的RV-PA耦合明显更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信