Enhancing Brake System Evaluation in Periodic Testing of Goods Transport Vehicles through FTA-FMEA Risk Analysis

Q2 Engineering
Irfan Ansori, Dwitya Harits Waskito, Mutharuddin Mutharuddin, Novi Irawati, Sinung Nugroho, Tetty Sulastri Mardiana, Subaryata Subaryata, Nurul Aldha Mauliddina Siregar
{"title":"Enhancing Brake System Evaluation in Periodic Testing of Goods Transport Vehicles through FTA-FMEA Risk Analysis","authors":"Irfan Ansori, Dwitya Harits Waskito, Mutharuddin Mutharuddin, Novi Irawati, Sinung Nugroho, Tetty Sulastri Mardiana, Subaryata Subaryata, Nurul Aldha Mauliddina Siregar","doi":"10.31603/ae.8394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure of the braking system is one of the factors causing traffic accidents, therefore periodic testing of goods transport vehicles is very important. In fact, the incidence rate is still very high despite routine testing. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for periodic testing must be updated to reduce the risk of possible accidents. Therefore, procedures for updating the SOP for periodic brake system testing are presented in this article. The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) methods were applied based on accident investigation data from the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC) from 2017 to 2022. FTA is used for risk identification, while FMEA is used for risk analysis to find the highest-risk failure cases. The results of our analysis showed that 13 failure cases were classified as intolerable so additional SOPs were required for each case. Finally, the results of this study provide new insights for stakeholders to revise the rules regarding periodic vehicle testing.","PeriodicalId":36133,"journal":{"name":"Automotive Experiences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive Experiences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.8394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Failure of the braking system is one of the factors causing traffic accidents, therefore periodic testing of goods transport vehicles is very important. In fact, the incidence rate is still very high despite routine testing. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for periodic testing must be updated to reduce the risk of possible accidents. Therefore, procedures for updating the SOP for periodic brake system testing are presented in this article. The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) methods were applied based on accident investigation data from the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC) from 2017 to 2022. FTA is used for risk identification, while FMEA is used for risk analysis to find the highest-risk failure cases. The results of our analysis showed that 13 failure cases were classified as intolerable so additional SOPs were required for each case. Finally, the results of this study provide new insights for stakeholders to revise the rules regarding periodic vehicle testing.
利用FTA-FMEA风险分析加强货运车辆定期试验制动系统评估
制动系统的失效是造成交通事故的因素之一,因此对货物运输车辆进行定期检测是非常重要的。事实上,尽管常规检查,发病率仍然很高。定期测试的标准操作程序(SOP)必须更新,以减少可能发生事故的风险。因此,本文提出了更新定期制动系统测试SOP的程序。基于美国国家运输安全委员会(NTSC) 2017年至2022年的事故调查数据,应用故障树分析(FTA)和故障模式与影响分析(FMEA)方法。采用FTA进行风险识别,采用FMEA进行风险分析,寻找风险最高的失效案例。我们的分析结果显示,13个失效案例被归类为不可容忍的,因此每个案例都需要额外的sop。最后,本研究结果为利益相关者修订车辆定期测试规则提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automotive Experiences
Automotive Experiences Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信