Colonial Possession and Gendered Labor: An Analysis of Women’s Role in the Bombay Cotton Textile Mills in the Late Nineteenth Century2

Palak Vashist
{"title":"Colonial Possession and Gendered Labor: An Analysis of Women’s Role in the Bombay Cotton Textile Mills in the Late Nineteenth Century2","authors":"Palak Vashist","doi":"10.31009/entremons.2023.i14.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically examines the conditions of women workers in the textile mills of Bombay during the late nineteenth century. The analysis is conducted through the lens of 'possession' by the colonial State and its policies of labor regulation. The concept of 'possession' is explored at two levels. First, it is argued that women's vulnerability in the colonial narrative served as the foundation for the arbitrary ‘protection’ policies devised by colonial authorities in the form of factory legislation. Second, it is highlighted that factory legislation established colonial control over women's gendered roles, categorizing them as 'unskilled' labor. The introduction of the Indian Factory Act of 1891 further restricted women's mobility within the factory space and regulated their working patterns, including working hours and days, ultimately leading to a higher unemployment rate among women workers. Furthermore, the Act justified irregular and underpaid wages for women.
 This paper highlights that the factory legislation, intended to protect women from their vulnerable position made them more vulnerable resulting in their unemployment. This examination of the gendered nature of the Bombay mills aims to trace the global postcolonial history of wage gaps and gender distinctions at work back to their colonial origins. Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of how colonial policies have had a lasting impact on labor practices and gender relations in postcolonial societies.","PeriodicalId":482756,"journal":{"name":"Entremons","volume":"118 30","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entremons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31009/entremons.2023.i14.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper critically examines the conditions of women workers in the textile mills of Bombay during the late nineteenth century. The analysis is conducted through the lens of 'possession' by the colonial State and its policies of labor regulation. The concept of 'possession' is explored at two levels. First, it is argued that women's vulnerability in the colonial narrative served as the foundation for the arbitrary ‘protection’ policies devised by colonial authorities in the form of factory legislation. Second, it is highlighted that factory legislation established colonial control over women's gendered roles, categorizing them as 'unskilled' labor. The introduction of the Indian Factory Act of 1891 further restricted women's mobility within the factory space and regulated their working patterns, including working hours and days, ultimately leading to a higher unemployment rate among women workers. Furthermore, the Act justified irregular and underpaid wages for women. This paper highlights that the factory legislation, intended to protect women from their vulnerable position made them more vulnerable resulting in their unemployment. This examination of the gendered nature of the Bombay mills aims to trace the global postcolonial history of wage gaps and gender distinctions at work back to their colonial origins. Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of how colonial policies have had a lasting impact on labor practices and gender relations in postcolonial societies.
殖民地占有与性别劳动:19世纪末孟买棉纺厂妇女角色分析
本文批判性地考察了19世纪后期孟买纺织厂女工的状况。分析是通过殖民国家的“占有”及其劳动监管政策进行的。“占有”的概念在两个层面上进行了探讨。首先,有人认为,妇女在殖民叙事中的脆弱性是殖民当局以工厂立法的形式制定武断的“保护”政策的基础。其次,它强调工厂立法建立了对妇女性别角色的殖民控制,将她们归类为“非熟练”劳动力。1891年《印度工厂法》的出台进一步限制了妇女在工厂内的流动性,并规范了她们的工作模式,包括工作时间和工作天数,最终导致女工失业率上升。此外,该法证明妇女工资不正常和支付过低是合理的。本文强调,工厂立法,旨在保护妇女的弱势地位,使她们更加脆弱,导致她们的失业。本文对孟买工厂的性别本质进行了考察,旨在追溯全球后殖民时期工资差距和职场性别差异的历史,并追溯到它们的殖民起源。总的来说,这项研究有助于我们理解殖民政策如何对后殖民社会的劳动实践和性别关系产生持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信