Validation of Ablation and Thermal Response Model for Three-Dimensional Multifunctional Ablator

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Yih-Kanq Chen, Tahir Gökçen
{"title":"Validation of Ablation and Thermal Response Model for Three-Dimensional Multifunctional Ablator","authors":"Yih-Kanq Chen, Tahir Gökçen","doi":"10.2514/1.a35761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A semi-empirical physics-based ablation and thermal response model was developed for the 3-Dimensional Multifunctional Ablative Thermal Protection System (3D-MAT) material. Model validation was achieved through comparison between computation and available data obtained in the arc-jet test series, which were conducted at NASA Ames Research Center from 2014 to 2020. The charring ablator simulations for arc-jet test models presented in this work were computed by the Two-Dimensional Implicit Thermal Response and Ablation (TITAN) code, and the Data-Parallel Line Relaxation Method (DPLR) code was used for arc-jet flow simulations to estimate the arc-jet stream total enthalpy and define the aerothermal boundary conditions over the test model surface for TITAN simulations. Because of low surface catalytic efficiency of 3D-MAT char, the exact surface heating could not be determined. Thus, three different types of boundary conditions, including 1) fully catalytic surface heating, 2) noncatalytic surface heating, and 3) surface temperature and recession, were used in the TITAN simulation for model validation. The predicted surface and in-depth temperature history for arc-jet test models were compared with pyrometer and thermocouple data, and the predicted test model surface recession and char depth were compared against the posttest measurements.","PeriodicalId":50048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets","volume":"104 51","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a35761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A semi-empirical physics-based ablation and thermal response model was developed for the 3-Dimensional Multifunctional Ablative Thermal Protection System (3D-MAT) material. Model validation was achieved through comparison between computation and available data obtained in the arc-jet test series, which were conducted at NASA Ames Research Center from 2014 to 2020. The charring ablator simulations for arc-jet test models presented in this work were computed by the Two-Dimensional Implicit Thermal Response and Ablation (TITAN) code, and the Data-Parallel Line Relaxation Method (DPLR) code was used for arc-jet flow simulations to estimate the arc-jet stream total enthalpy and define the aerothermal boundary conditions over the test model surface for TITAN simulations. Because of low surface catalytic efficiency of 3D-MAT char, the exact surface heating could not be determined. Thus, three different types of boundary conditions, including 1) fully catalytic surface heating, 2) noncatalytic surface heating, and 3) surface temperature and recession, were used in the TITAN simulation for model validation. The predicted surface and in-depth temperature history for arc-jet test models were compared with pyrometer and thermocouple data, and the predicted test model surface recession and char depth were compared against the posttest measurements.
三维多功能烧蚀器烧蚀及热响应模型的验证
针对三维多功能烧蚀热防护系统(3D-MAT)材料,建立了基于半经验物理的烧蚀和热响应模型。通过将计算结果与2014 - 2020年在NASA Ames研究中心进行的电弧射流试验系列中获得的可用数据进行比较,实现了模型的验证。本文采用二维隐式热响应和烧蚀(TITAN)程序对电弧射流试验模型进行烧蚀模拟,采用数据-平行线松弛法(DPLR)程序对电弧射流进行模拟,估算电弧射流总焓,确定试验模型表面的气动热边界条件。由于3D-MAT炭的表面催化效率较低,因此无法确定准确的表面加热。因此,在TITAN模拟中使用了三种不同类型的边界条件,包括1)完全催化表面加热,2)非催化表面加热,以及3)表面温度和衰退。将电弧喷射试验模型的预测表面和深度温度历史与高温计和热电偶数据进行了比较,并将预测的测试模型表面衰退和焦炭深度与测试后的测量结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: This Journal, that started it all back in 1963, is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of astronautics and aeronautics through the dissemination of original archival research papers disclosing new theoretical developments and/or experimental result. The topics include aeroacoustics, aerodynamics, combustion, fundamentals of propulsion, fluid mechanics and reacting flows, fundamental aspects of the aerospace environment, hydrodynamics, lasers and associated phenomena, plasmas, research instrumentation and facilities, structural mechanics and materials, optimization, and thermomechanics and thermochemistry. Papers also are sought which review in an intensive manner the results of recent research developments on any of the topics listed above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信