Documentary principles in fiction in the light of the value-ontological approach

O. Minnullin
{"title":"Documentary principles in fiction in the light of the value-ontological approach","authors":"O. Minnullin","doi":"10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-127-137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the publication is to establish the reasons for the growth of the documentary principle in fiction for over the last one and a half centuries in connection with the transformation of the semantic and value powers that the author of the work possesses. The value aspect of the documentary principle in literature is about the role the fact plays as a link with being, when the writer’s ability and his right to authoritatively act as a subject coming into contact with the cumulative experience of mankind is called into question. In the presence of the documentary principle, the result of a creative act is not a narrowly understood aesthetic product, a phenomenon of an exclusively fictitious nature realized in “autonomous being”, taken outside the “reality of births and deaths” of the author and the reader. Reliance on the fact opens up the possibility for a creative act to be realized as an event, rooted in the space of its responsibility to true being. However, the creative activity of the artist as the founder and organizer of a meaning-generating event still remains an indispensable condition for a work of art. The dialectical unity of the truth of a fact (document) and the individual creative initiative of the author is preserved in literature of a predominantly documentary nature. The author confirms the authenticity of all stamps on the document, personally and artistically ratifying it and overcoming its subjective ontological fluctuation. The formative initiative of the author also remains of paramount importance due to the fact that a direct transfer of life to paper is impossible (either because of its inexpressiveness, or, more often, due to the intolerable traumatic experience that is ousted from the bright field of the individual’s consciousness). The author provides an opportunity for the other (the reader) to have access to the “bare life”, of which he was a witness and a participant, creatively building a subject-shaped structure that ensures this accessibility. The work of V. T. Shalamov serves as a support for the ideas presented in the article.","PeriodicalId":474357,"journal":{"name":"Philology and Culture","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-71-1-127-137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the publication is to establish the reasons for the growth of the documentary principle in fiction for over the last one and a half centuries in connection with the transformation of the semantic and value powers that the author of the work possesses. The value aspect of the documentary principle in literature is about the role the fact plays as a link with being, when the writer’s ability and his right to authoritatively act as a subject coming into contact with the cumulative experience of mankind is called into question. In the presence of the documentary principle, the result of a creative act is not a narrowly understood aesthetic product, a phenomenon of an exclusively fictitious nature realized in “autonomous being”, taken outside the “reality of births and deaths” of the author and the reader. Reliance on the fact opens up the possibility for a creative act to be realized as an event, rooted in the space of its responsibility to true being. However, the creative activity of the artist as the founder and organizer of a meaning-generating event still remains an indispensable condition for a work of art. The dialectical unity of the truth of a fact (document) and the individual creative initiative of the author is preserved in literature of a predominantly documentary nature. The author confirms the authenticity of all stamps on the document, personally and artistically ratifying it and overcoming its subjective ontological fluctuation. The formative initiative of the author also remains of paramount importance due to the fact that a direct transfer of life to paper is impossible (either because of its inexpressiveness, or, more often, due to the intolerable traumatic experience that is ousted from the bright field of the individual’s consciousness). The author provides an opportunity for the other (the reader) to have access to the “bare life”, of which he was a witness and a participant, creatively building a subject-shaped structure that ensures this accessibility. The work of V. T. Shalamov serves as a support for the ideas presented in the article.
基于价值本体论的小说纪实原则
该出版物的目的是建立在过去一个半世纪的小说纪实原则的增长的原因,与作品的作者所拥有的语义和价值力量的转变有关。文献原则在文学中的价值方面在于,当作家作为主体权威性地与人类积累的经验接触时,事实与存在的联系所起的作用受到质疑。在纪实原则的存在下,一种创作行为的结果不是一种狭隘理解的审美产物,一种完全虚构的现象,在“自主存在”中实现,超越了作者和读者的“生死现实”。对事实的依赖开启了创造性行为作为一个事件得以实现的可能性,它植根于对真实存在的责任空间。然而,艺术家作为意义产生事件的创始人和组织者的创造性活动仍然是艺术作品不可或缺的条件。事实(文件)的真相和作者的个人创造性主动性的辩证统一保存在文学的主要文献性质。作者对文件上所有印章的真实性进行了确认,以个人的方式和艺术的方式对其进行了认可,并克服了其主观的本体论波动。作者的形成主动性也仍然是至关重要的,因为将生活直接转移到纸上是不可能的(要么是因为它的难以表达,或者,更常见的是,由于无法忍受的创伤经历被从个人意识的明亮领域中驱逐出去)。作者为另一个人(读者)提供了一个接近“赤裸生活”的机会,他是其中的见证人和参与者,创造性地建立了一个主体形结构,以确保这种可达性。V. T.沙拉莫夫的工作为本文提出的观点提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信