Online and Offline Virtual Training Versus Traditional Training on Theoretical Knowledge of Dentistry Students in Primary Tooth Pulp Treatment

Arghavan Kamalisabeti, Siavash Salehi Sedeh, Rezvan Rafatjou, Maryam Farhadian
{"title":"Online and Offline Virtual Training Versus Traditional Training on Theoretical Knowledge of Dentistry Students in Primary Tooth Pulp Treatment","authors":"Arghavan Kamalisabeti, Siavash Salehi Sedeh, Rezvan Rafatjou, Maryam Farhadian","doi":"10.34172/ajdr.2023.1683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Higher education faced difficult conditions caused by the coronavirus pandemic after January 2020. In such a situation, education through virtual space was one of the highly important and considerable proposed programs. So far, to our knowledge, no study has compared online and offline virtual education with traditional education in dentistry students. Accordingly, this study compared the efficacy of online and offline virtual training on theoretical knowledge of dentistry students in primary tooth pulp treatment with that of traditional training. Methods: This semi-experimental study was conducted on dental students who have taken the theoretical pediatrics 2 course in the second half of the academic year 2020-2021. All students were randomly divided into three groups of 20 people, including online and offline virtual training and traditional training (control) groups. Educational contents were delivered to students in the form of an identical PowerPoint for all groups. The PowerPoint slides were prepared and virtual and face-to-face classes were held by the same person (Instructor). In addition, the pre-test and post-test were performed virtually with the same questions (20 questions designed by the instructor). Finally, SPSS-23 was used to describe and analyze the data. Results: The participants were 60 students with an average age of 23±0.48 years, including 42 males (70.0%.). No significant difference was observed among groups in terms of gender, age, grade point average (GPA), and pre-test score (P>0.05). The post-test score was significantly higher than the pre-test score (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in terms of post-test and \"post-test-pre-test\" scores among the groups (P>0.05). GPA was significantly correlated with the post-test score (P<0.001) and score changes (post-test-pre-test score) (P<0.001). Conclusions: It was found that online and offline virtual education are two suitable alternatives for the traditional education of dental students in the primary teeth pulp treatment course.","PeriodicalId":8679,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.2023.1683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Higher education faced difficult conditions caused by the coronavirus pandemic after January 2020. In such a situation, education through virtual space was one of the highly important and considerable proposed programs. So far, to our knowledge, no study has compared online and offline virtual education with traditional education in dentistry students. Accordingly, this study compared the efficacy of online and offline virtual training on theoretical knowledge of dentistry students in primary tooth pulp treatment with that of traditional training. Methods: This semi-experimental study was conducted on dental students who have taken the theoretical pediatrics 2 course in the second half of the academic year 2020-2021. All students were randomly divided into three groups of 20 people, including online and offline virtual training and traditional training (control) groups. Educational contents were delivered to students in the form of an identical PowerPoint for all groups. The PowerPoint slides were prepared and virtual and face-to-face classes were held by the same person (Instructor). In addition, the pre-test and post-test were performed virtually with the same questions (20 questions designed by the instructor). Finally, SPSS-23 was used to describe and analyze the data. Results: The participants were 60 students with an average age of 23±0.48 years, including 42 males (70.0%.). No significant difference was observed among groups in terms of gender, age, grade point average (GPA), and pre-test score (P>0.05). The post-test score was significantly higher than the pre-test score (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in terms of post-test and "post-test-pre-test" scores among the groups (P>0.05). GPA was significantly correlated with the post-test score (P<0.001) and score changes (post-test-pre-test score) (P<0.001). Conclusions: It was found that online and offline virtual education are two suitable alternatives for the traditional education of dental students in the primary teeth pulp treatment course.
牙医学学生初级牙髓治疗理论知识线上、线下虚拟培训与传统培训的比较
背景:2020年1月以后,高等教育面临新冠肺炎疫情带来的困境。在这种情况下,通过虚拟空间进行教育是非常重要和可观的建议方案之一。到目前为止,据我们所知,还没有研究将牙科学生的线上和线下虚拟教育与传统教育进行比较。因此,本研究比较了在线和离线虚拟培训对牙科学生初级牙髓治疗理论知识与传统培训的效果。方法:本半实验研究以2020-2021学年下半学期修读儿科学理论2课程的牙科专业学生为研究对象。所有学生被随机分为三组,每组20人,包括线上和线下虚拟训练组和传统训练组(对照组)。教育内容以相同的ppt形式呈现给所有小组的学生。准备了PowerPoint幻灯片,并由同一个人(讲师)进行虚拟和面对面的课程。此外,前测和后测几乎用相同的问题进行(由讲师设计的20个问题)。最后使用SPSS-23对数据进行描述和分析。结果:学生60人,平均年龄23±0.48岁,其中男性42人,占70.0%。各组在性别、年龄、平均绩点(GPA)和测前成绩方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。后测得分显著高于前测得分(P> 0.01),组间后测和“后测-前测”得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。GPA与测试后分数(P<0.001)和分数变化(测试后-测试前分数)(P<0.001)显著相关。结论:线上和线下虚拟教育是牙科学生在初级牙髓治疗课程中较适合的两种教育方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信