OSMANLI’DA CEMAAT MECLİSLERİNE BİR ÖRNEK: 19. YÜZYIL SONLARINDA UZUNKÖPRÜ (CİSR-İ ERGENE) CEMAAT MECLİSLERİ (1883-1903)

Tarık SARIOĞLU
{"title":"OSMANLI’DA CEMAAT MECLİSLERİNE BİR ÖRNEK: 19. YÜZYIL SONLARINDA UZUNKÖPRÜ (CİSR-İ ERGENE) CEMAAT MECLİSLERİ (1883-1903)","authors":"Tarık SARIOĞLU","doi":"10.26468/trakyasobed.1265051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ottoman society was divided into Muslim and non-Muslim elements regardless of their ethnic origins. The Ottoman Empire, starting from the principle of respecting the religious beliefs of non-Muslims since its foundation, has paid attention to their freedom of worship and ritual. The expansion route of the Ottoman Empire was generally on the lands where Christians lived. On this occasion, it carried out a policy of complete freedom and tolerance on the non-Muslim population that it dominated and gave the necessary permission for these societies to perform their worship or rituals according to their own religions and sects. The Ottoman Empire expanded its borders to the Balkans during the reign of Murad I, and increased the population of the non-Muslim societies within its body through new conquests in the following years. From the period when the Ottoman Empire expanded its conquest movements in the Balkans until the conquest of Istanbul, the non-Muslims under its rule were governed according to Islamic law. The non-Muslim societies, which increased after the conquest of Istanbul during the reign of Mehmed II., began to be managed with an arrangement in accordance with the “nation system” policy from this date on. In line with this structure, it has managed to keep non-Muslims together for centuries by granting various rights (religion, worship, trade, social, cultural etc.). The source of this understanding is a legal structure formed by the principles laid down by the religion of Islam. In accordance with Islamic law, the status of non-Muslims living within the Ottoman borders was determined as zimmî (those who accepted the protection of the Islamic state), and accordingly, non-Muslims were divided into separate communities according to their religion and sect. With this system, the state, which brought a new perspective to the politics of tolerance, allowed a wide autonomy of the community, regardless of religion, language, race, tradition and custom. Although the communities ruled by this system for hundreds of years were caught up in the nationalist movement that flared up since the beginning of the 19th century, they still maintained the inviolability of their religious and cultural structures as a result of the rights determined by the Ottoman Empire with edicts and regulations. 
 The Ottoman State did not interfere in the internal organization and administration of these communities, and the administration of the places of worship was again left to the management organizations of the relevant communities. These religious communities, which continue to exist independently, separately and inwardly within the state, have formed the basis of the nation system as long as they fulfill their responsibilities towards the state. The weakness of the influence of this subculture on the communities, which emerged in the face of the dominant Islamic law, prevented a strong structuring that would develop against the state and strengthened the bond of the individual with the community. In this respect, the nation system has been effective in the emergence of a stronger structure in the relations of the individual, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, within the community, community-state, community-community.
 The Ottoman Empire made the classification of non-Muslims in accordance with Islamic law. The ethnic (racial) origins of the nations were not taken into account, and they were determined on the basis of their religion or sect. Therefore, the people living within the borders of the Ottoman Empire were classified as Muslim, Orthodox, Catholic and Jewish, not Turkish, Greek, Bulgarian, Arab… etc. While the zimmîs, who were first classified according to their religion and sect in the Ottoman Empire, consisted of three separate nations as Greek, Armenian and Jewish, they have also classified different nations as Gregorian and Catholic Armenians and Protestants since the 19th century.
 With the 11th article of Kanun-i Esasi, which was accepted in 1876, besides the emphasis on “the official religion of the state is Islam”, the right to worship was given on behalf of all religions recognized by the Ottoman Empire, provided that it was in accordance with public order and manners. In addition, various privileges were confirmed to all religious communities living under the roof of the Ottoman Empire. Again, with the decision to establish community councils in the provinces with the 111th article of the said law, the influence of the communities in local administrations was also increased. In this article, in the light of various sources and documents, it will be tried to give information about the establishment of provincial communities and the Islamic, Greek and Bulgarian community councils established in Uzunköprü at the end of the 19th century.
 Keywords: Uzunköprü, Communities, Religion, Parliament, Ottoman.","PeriodicalId":478173,"journal":{"name":"Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1265051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ottoman society was divided into Muslim and non-Muslim elements regardless of their ethnic origins. The Ottoman Empire, starting from the principle of respecting the religious beliefs of non-Muslims since its foundation, has paid attention to their freedom of worship and ritual. The expansion route of the Ottoman Empire was generally on the lands where Christians lived. On this occasion, it carried out a policy of complete freedom and tolerance on the non-Muslim population that it dominated and gave the necessary permission for these societies to perform their worship or rituals according to their own religions and sects. The Ottoman Empire expanded its borders to the Balkans during the reign of Murad I, and increased the population of the non-Muslim societies within its body through new conquests in the following years. From the period when the Ottoman Empire expanded its conquest movements in the Balkans until the conquest of Istanbul, the non-Muslims under its rule were governed according to Islamic law. The non-Muslim societies, which increased after the conquest of Istanbul during the reign of Mehmed II., began to be managed with an arrangement in accordance with the “nation system” policy from this date on. In line with this structure, it has managed to keep non-Muslims together for centuries by granting various rights (religion, worship, trade, social, cultural etc.). The source of this understanding is a legal structure formed by the principles laid down by the religion of Islam. In accordance with Islamic law, the status of non-Muslims living within the Ottoman borders was determined as zimmî (those who accepted the protection of the Islamic state), and accordingly, non-Muslims were divided into separate communities according to their religion and sect. With this system, the state, which brought a new perspective to the politics of tolerance, allowed a wide autonomy of the community, regardless of religion, language, race, tradition and custom. Although the communities ruled by this system for hundreds of years were caught up in the nationalist movement that flared up since the beginning of the 19th century, they still maintained the inviolability of their religious and cultural structures as a result of the rights determined by the Ottoman Empire with edicts and regulations. The Ottoman State did not interfere in the internal organization and administration of these communities, and the administration of the places of worship was again left to the management organizations of the relevant communities. These religious communities, which continue to exist independently, separately and inwardly within the state, have formed the basis of the nation system as long as they fulfill their responsibilities towards the state. The weakness of the influence of this subculture on the communities, which emerged in the face of the dominant Islamic law, prevented a strong structuring that would develop against the state and strengthened the bond of the individual with the community. In this respect, the nation system has been effective in the emergence of a stronger structure in the relations of the individual, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, within the community, community-state, community-community. The Ottoman Empire made the classification of non-Muslims in accordance with Islamic law. The ethnic (racial) origins of the nations were not taken into account, and they were determined on the basis of their religion or sect. Therefore, the people living within the borders of the Ottoman Empire were classified as Muslim, Orthodox, Catholic and Jewish, not Turkish, Greek, Bulgarian, Arab… etc. While the zimmîs, who were first classified according to their religion and sect in the Ottoman Empire, consisted of three separate nations as Greek, Armenian and Jewish, they have also classified different nations as Gregorian and Catholic Armenians and Protestants since the 19th century. With the 11th article of Kanun-i Esasi, which was accepted in 1876, besides the emphasis on “the official religion of the state is Islam”, the right to worship was given on behalf of all religions recognized by the Ottoman Empire, provided that it was in accordance with public order and manners. In addition, various privileges were confirmed to all religious communities living under the roof of the Ottoman Empire. Again, with the decision to establish community councils in the provinces with the 111th article of the said law, the influence of the communities in local administrations was also increased. In this article, in the light of various sources and documents, it will be tried to give information about the establishment of provincial communities and the Islamic, Greek and Bulgarian community councils established in Uzunköprü at the end of the 19th century. Keywords: Uzunköprü, Communities, Religion, Parliament, Ottoman.
奥斯曼土耳其社区大会的一个实例:19 世纪末 Uzunköprü 社区委员会(1883-1903 年)......
奥斯曼社会不分种族,分为穆斯林和非穆斯林两部分。奥斯曼帝国从建国之初就以尊重非穆斯林的宗教信仰为原则,重视他们的宗教信仰自由和仪式自由。奥斯曼帝国的扩张路线通常是在基督徒居住的土地上。在这种情况下,它对它所统治的非穆斯林人口实行完全自由和容忍的政策,并给予这些社会根据自己的宗教和教派进行崇拜或仪式的必要许可。在穆拉德一世统治期间,奥斯曼帝国将其边界扩展到巴尔干半岛,并在随后的几年里通过新的征服增加了其体内非穆斯林社会的人口。从奥斯曼帝国扩大在巴尔干半岛的征服运动到征服伊斯坦布尔,在其统治下的非穆斯林按照伊斯兰教法进行统治。非穆斯林社会,在穆罕默德二世统治时期征服伊斯坦布尔后增加。从这一天起,开始按照“国家制度”的政策安排进行管理。根据这种结构,几个世纪以来,它通过授予各种权利(宗教、崇拜、贸易、社会、文化等),成功地将非穆斯林团结在一起。这种理解的来源是由伊斯兰教所规定的原则所形成的法律结构。根据伊斯兰法律,生活在奥斯曼边界内的非穆斯林的地位被确定为zimmî(那些接受伊斯兰国家保护的人),相应地,非穆斯林根据他们的宗教和教派被划分为单独的社区。在这种制度下,国家允许社区的广泛自治,而不受宗教,语言,种族,传统和习俗的限制,从而为宽容的政治带来了新的视角。虽然在这一制度下统治了数百年的社群陷入了19世纪初爆发的民族主义运动,但由于奥斯曼帝国以法令和法规确定的权利,他们仍然保持着宗教和文化结构的不可侵犯性。& # x0D;奥斯曼帝国不干涉这些社区的内部组织和管理,礼拜场所的管理再次留给有关社区的管理组织。这些宗教团体继续在国家内部独立、分离地存在,只要它们履行对国家的责任,就构成了民族制度的基础。这种亚文化在面对占主导地位的伊斯兰法律时对社区的影响很弱,这阻止了一种反对国家的强大结构的发展,并加强了个人与社区的联系。在这方面,国家体系有效地在个人关系中出现了更强大的结构,无论是穆斯林还是非穆斯林,在社区内,社区-国家,社区-社区。 奥斯曼帝国根据伊斯兰教法对非穆斯林进行了分类。这些国家的民族(种族)起源没有被考虑在内,他们是根据他们的宗教或教派来决定的。因此,生活在奥斯曼帝国边界内的人被划分为穆斯林、东正教、天主教和犹太教徒,而不是土耳其人、希腊人、保加利亚人、阿拉伯人等等。虽然在奥斯曼帝国首次根据宗教和教派进行分类的zimms由希腊人,亚美尼亚人和犹太人三个独立的国家组成,但自19世纪以来,他们也将不同的国家划分为格列高利人,天主教亚美尼亚人和新教徒。1876年通过的《伊斯兰教法典》第11条除了强调“国家的官方宗教是伊斯兰教”外,还规定了奥斯曼帝国承认的所有宗教都有做礼拜的权利,只要符合公共秩序和礼仪。此外,生活在奥斯曼帝国屋檐下的所有宗教团体都享有各种特权。此外,随着根据上述法律第111条决定在各省设立社区理事会,社区在地方行政机构中的影响力也有所增加。在本文中,将根据各种资料来源和文件,试图提供有关19世纪末在Uzunköprü建立的各省社区和伊斯兰、希腊和保加利亚社区委员会的资料。关键词:Uzunköprü,社区,宗教,议会,奥斯曼帝国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信