Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Rocuronium Bromide vs. Succinyl Choline on Quality of Intubating Conditions during General Anesthesia

Aditi Burkul, Nazima Memon, Vaishnavi Kulkarni
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Rocuronium Bromide vs. Succinyl Choline on Quality of Intubating Conditions during General Anesthesia","authors":"Aditi Burkul, Nazima Memon, Vaishnavi Kulkarni","doi":"10.15850/ijihs.v11n2.3457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare the quality of intubating conditions and hemodynamic responses to the administration of Rocuronium Bromide and Succinyl Choline during general anesthesia.Methods: This was a comparative study conducted at the anesthesiology department of a tertiary care medical college. Sixty patients undergoing various surgeries under general anesthesia were included in this study based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into Group S (receiving succinylcholine) and Group R (receiving rocuronium). In all patients, the quality of intubating conditions was assessed. Excellent or good conditions were considered to be acceptable intubating conditions, whereas fair and poor conditions were considered unacceptable.Results: Mean age, weight, gender distribution, and ASA grades were comparable in both groups. The overall quality of intubation was found to be better in group S than in group R, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.004). The duration of action was significantly longer in group R than in group S (P<0.001). Hemodynamic stability was comparable in both the groups, except for heart rate at 10 min, which was higher in Group R than in Group S. Incidence of fasciculation was significantly more in Group S as compared to Group R, and the difference was found to be highly significant (P=0.0001).Conclusion: Succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation is associated with better intubation conditions than rocuronium.","PeriodicalId":30637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15850/ijihs.v11n2.3457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the quality of intubating conditions and hemodynamic responses to the administration of Rocuronium Bromide and Succinyl Choline during general anesthesia.Methods: This was a comparative study conducted at the anesthesiology department of a tertiary care medical college. Sixty patients undergoing various surgeries under general anesthesia were included in this study based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into Group S (receiving succinylcholine) and Group R (receiving rocuronium). In all patients, the quality of intubating conditions was assessed. Excellent or good conditions were considered to be acceptable intubating conditions, whereas fair and poor conditions were considered unacceptable.Results: Mean age, weight, gender distribution, and ASA grades were comparable in both groups. The overall quality of intubation was found to be better in group S than in group R, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.004). The duration of action was significantly longer in group R than in group S (P<0.001). Hemodynamic stability was comparable in both the groups, except for heart rate at 10 min, which was higher in Group R than in Group S. Incidence of fasciculation was significantly more in Group S as compared to Group R, and the difference was found to be highly significant (P=0.0001).Conclusion: Succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation is associated with better intubation conditions than rocuronium.
罗库溴铵与琥珀酰胆碱对全麻插管条件质量的比较评价
目的:比较全身麻醉下罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱的插管质量和血流动力学反应。方法:在某三级专科医学院麻醉科进行比较研究。根据预先设定的纳入和排除标准,将60例在全身麻醉下接受各种手术的患者纳入本研究。患者分为S组(接受琥珀胆碱治疗)和R组(接受罗库溴铵治疗)。对所有患者的插管条件质量进行评估。优秀或良好的条件被认为是可以接受的插管条件,而一般和差的条件被认为是不可接受的。结果:两组患者的平均年龄、体重、性别分布和ASA分级具有可比性。整体插管质量S组优于R组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.004)。R组的作用时间明显长于S组(P<0.001)。两组的血流动力学稳定性相当,但10min心率R组高于S组,S组的束状反应发生率明显高于R组,差异有高度统计学意义(P=0.0001)。结论:琥珀胆碱用于快速序贯插管比罗库溴铵具有更好的插管条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信