Engineering validation of BB-SPEEDset, a data set of near-source physics-based simulated accelerograms

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Chiara Smerzini, Chiara Amendola, Roberto Paolucci, Arsalan Bazrafshan
{"title":"Engineering validation of BB-SPEEDset, a data set of near-source physics-based simulated accelerograms","authors":"Chiara Smerzini, Chiara Amendola, Roberto Paolucci, Arsalan Bazrafshan","doi":"10.1177/87552930231206766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physics-based numerical simulations (PBS) have progressed to the level of providing a realistic description of earthquake ground motion and of its variability, both in time and space, thus enabling to fill the knowledge gaps due to the sparsity of recordings (especially in the near-source region of strong earthquakes). Nevertheless, to build confidence in the utilization of the PBS by the engineering community, simulated accelerograms need to be validated against recorded data from both seismological and engineering perspectives. This article aims at extending the validation of BB-SPEEDset, a data set of near-source broadband simulated accelerograms from multiple regions and faulting styles, obtained by the spectral element computer code SPEED. In addition to seismological checks of BB-SPEEDset proving the absence of systematic biases with respect to a near-source records data set, in this work, the validation is addressed in terms of engineering demand parameters (EDPs) of elastoplastic single-degree-of-freedom systems, taking advantage of a ground motion selection tool including simulated accelerograms. It is found that, when simulated and recorded accelerograms are selected according to the same spectral compatibility criteria, consistent statistical distributions of EDPs are obtained from the two sets. To highlight the potentialities of BB-SPEEDset for near-source analyses, an example of utilization of spectrum-compatible pulse-like motions for structural inelastic analyses is also given, resulting in a good agreement with literature solutions in terms of inelastic displacement demands.","PeriodicalId":11392,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":"1 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231206766","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physics-based numerical simulations (PBS) have progressed to the level of providing a realistic description of earthquake ground motion and of its variability, both in time and space, thus enabling to fill the knowledge gaps due to the sparsity of recordings (especially in the near-source region of strong earthquakes). Nevertheless, to build confidence in the utilization of the PBS by the engineering community, simulated accelerograms need to be validated against recorded data from both seismological and engineering perspectives. This article aims at extending the validation of BB-SPEEDset, a data set of near-source broadband simulated accelerograms from multiple regions and faulting styles, obtained by the spectral element computer code SPEED. In addition to seismological checks of BB-SPEEDset proving the absence of systematic biases with respect to a near-source records data set, in this work, the validation is addressed in terms of engineering demand parameters (EDPs) of elastoplastic single-degree-of-freedom systems, taking advantage of a ground motion selection tool including simulated accelerograms. It is found that, when simulated and recorded accelerograms are selected according to the same spectral compatibility criteria, consistent statistical distributions of EDPs are obtained from the two sets. To highlight the potentialities of BB-SPEEDset for near-source analyses, an example of utilization of spectrum-compatible pulse-like motions for structural inelastic analyses is also given, resulting in a good agreement with literature solutions in terms of inelastic displacement demands.
BB-SPEEDset的工程验证,这是一个基于近源物理的模拟加速度数据集
基于物理的数值模拟(PBS)已经发展到提供地震地面运动及其时空变化的真实描述的水平,从而能够填补由于记录的稀疏性(特别是在强震的近源区域)而导致的知识空白。然而,为了建立工程界对PBS应用的信心,需要从地震学和工程角度对模拟加速度图进行验证。本文旨在扩展由谱元计算机代码SPEED获得的多区域、多断层样式近源宽带模拟加速度数据集BB-SPEEDset的验证。除了对BB-SPEEDset进行地震检查,证明在近源记录数据集方面不存在系统偏差之外,在这项工作中,利用包括模拟加速度在内的地面运动选择工具,根据弹塑性单自由度系统的工程需求参数(EDPs)进行验证。研究发现,当采用相同的光谱兼容性标准选择模拟加速度和记录加速度时,两组加速度加速度的统计分布是一致的。为了强调BB-SPEEDset在近源分析中的潜力,还给出了一个利用频谱兼容脉冲运动进行结构非弹性分析的例子,结果与文献中关于非弹性位移需求的解决方案很好地一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Spectra
Earthquake Spectra 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Earthquake Spectra, the professional peer-reviewed journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), serves as the publication of record for the development of earthquake engineering practice, earthquake codes and regulations, earthquake public policy, and earthquake investigation reports. The journal is published quarterly in both printed and online editions in February, May, August, and November, with additional special edition issues. EERI established Earthquake Spectra with the purpose of improving the practice of earthquake hazards mitigation, preparedness, and recovery — serving the informational needs of the diverse professionals engaged in earthquake risk reduction: civil, geotechnical, mechanical, and structural engineers; geologists, seismologists, and other earth scientists; architects and city planners; public officials; social scientists; and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信