Analysis of Sample Science Questions for Secondary School Exam in terms of Revised Bloom Taxonomy

Gülşah ZERMAN KEPCEOĞLU, Murat PEKTAŞ
{"title":"Analysis of Sample Science Questions for Secondary School Exam in terms of Revised Bloom Taxonomy","authors":"Gülşah ZERMAN KEPCEOĞLU, Murat PEKTAŞ","doi":"10.24106/kefdergi-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In this research, it is aimed to examine the sample questions for the exam in high school transition system published between 2018-2022 according to the revised bloom taxonomy.
 Design/Methodology/Approach: The document analysis model was used and The data source of this research is the science questions in the sample questions for the central examination for secondary education institutions to admit students by examination published on the website of the General Directorate of Measurement, Evaluation and Examination by the Ministry of National Education since October 2018. Between October 2018 and December 2022, a total of 355 science questions were published and in this study all of these questions examined according to the revised bloom taxonomy.
 Findings: Most of the sample questions examined are within the scope of conceptual questions. 74% of the questions published in 2018, 75% of the questions in 2019, 66% of the questions in 2020 and 2021, and 70% of the questions in 2022 are at the level of conceptual knowledge.
 Highlights: Almost all of the questions are in the conceptual knowledge class and are preferred from low-level questions, and high-level questions are the last ones. Another important finding is that all of the high-level questions (58 questions) are preferred from the category “Analyze”, but not at all from the categories “Evaluate” and “Create”.","PeriodicalId":342758,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi-2023-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this research, it is aimed to examine the sample questions for the exam in high school transition system published between 2018-2022 according to the revised bloom taxonomy. Design/Methodology/Approach: The document analysis model was used and The data source of this research is the science questions in the sample questions for the central examination for secondary education institutions to admit students by examination published on the website of the General Directorate of Measurement, Evaluation and Examination by the Ministry of National Education since October 2018. Between October 2018 and December 2022, a total of 355 science questions were published and in this study all of these questions examined according to the revised bloom taxonomy. Findings: Most of the sample questions examined are within the scope of conceptual questions. 74% of the questions published in 2018, 75% of the questions in 2019, 66% of the questions in 2020 and 2021, and 70% of the questions in 2022 are at the level of conceptual knowledge. Highlights: Almost all of the questions are in the conceptual knowledge class and are preferred from low-level questions, and high-level questions are the last ones. Another important finding is that all of the high-level questions (58 questions) are preferred from the category “Analyze”, but not at all from the categories “Evaluate” and “Create”.
用修订的Bloom分类法分析中学考试科学样题
目的:在本研究中,根据修订后的bloom分类法,对2018-2022年高中转学系统考试样本题进行检验。 设计/方法/方法:采用文献分析模型,本研究的数据来源为2018年10月以来国家教育部计量评估与考试总局网站公布的中等教育机构招生中心考试样题中的科学题。在2018年10月至2022年12月期间,共发表了355个科学问题,在本研究中,所有这些问题都根据修订后的bloom分类法进行了检查。调查结果:大多数样本问题都在概念问题的范围内。2018年74%的问题、2019年75%的问题、2020年和2021年66%的问题、2022年70%的问题属于概念知识水平。 亮点:几乎所有的题目都在概念知识课上,从低级题开始优先,高级题是最后一个。另一个重要的发现是,所有高级问题(58个问题)都来自“分析”类别,但根本没有来自“评估”和“创造”类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信