Ethically Digital: Contested Cultural Heritage in Digital Context

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Bijan Rouhani
{"title":"Ethically Digital: Contested Cultural Heritage in Digital Context","authors":"Bijan Rouhani","doi":"10.14434/sdh.v7i1.35741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past century, our understanding of cultural heritage has evolved, and now, heritage is seen more as a process than a product. Although the advancement of digital technologies has significantly aided in the research, protection, management, interpretation, and education of cultural heritage, it also raises the question of how far this technology works in accordance with our current understanding of heritage as a process and is not taking a reductionist approach, in which heritage is cut off from its community and context. Ethical risks are higher for contested heritage, when meaning and values are questioned, or when people's ability to access and enjoy heritage is threatened. This paper discusses potential ethical risks regarding access, control, dissemination, and the digital economy by looking at existing approaches, guidelines, and principles in this field and a few digital heritage projects about contested heritage, and it questions whether the lack of an inclusive ethical framework could lead to a new kind of digital colonisation.
 
","PeriodicalId":52934,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Digital Heritage","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Digital Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v7i1.35741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past century, our understanding of cultural heritage has evolved, and now, heritage is seen more as a process than a product. Although the advancement of digital technologies has significantly aided in the research, protection, management, interpretation, and education of cultural heritage, it also raises the question of how far this technology works in accordance with our current understanding of heritage as a process and is not taking a reductionist approach, in which heritage is cut off from its community and context. Ethical risks are higher for contested heritage, when meaning and values are questioned, or when people's ability to access and enjoy heritage is threatened. This paper discusses potential ethical risks regarding access, control, dissemination, and the digital economy by looking at existing approaches, guidelines, and principles in this field and a few digital heritage projects about contested heritage, and it questions whether the lack of an inclusive ethical framework could lead to a new kind of digital colonisation.
伦理数字化:数字化背景下有争议的文化遗产
在过去的一个世纪里,我们对文化遗产的理解发生了变化,现在,遗产更多地被视为一个过程,而不是一个产品。尽管数字技术的进步极大地帮助了文化遗产的研究、保护、管理、解释和教育,但它也提出了一个问题,即这项技术在多大程度上符合我们目前对遗产作为一个过程的理解,而不是采取一种简化的方法,在这种方法中,遗产与其社区和背景相分离。当意义和价值受到质疑,或者当人们获取和享受遗产的能力受到威胁时,有争议的遗产面临的伦理风险更高。本文通过研究该领域的现有方法、指导方针和原则,以及一些关于有争议遗产的数字遗产项目,讨论了有关获取、控制、传播和数字经济的潜在伦理风险,并质疑缺乏包容性伦理框架是否会导致一种新型的数字殖民。 & # x0D;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Digital Heritage
Studies in Digital Heritage Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信