Statistics as an Instrument of Ideological Confrontation

L. A. Davletshina, M. V. Karmanov
{"title":"Statistics as an Instrument of Ideological Confrontation","authors":"L. A. Davletshina, M. V. Karmanov","doi":"10.21686/2500-3925-2023-5-4-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study lies in the fact that only with a competent comprehensive assessment of quantitative parameters, their qualitative interpretation is possible. Statistics acts as such a tool. The purpose of the study . The purpose of this paper is to study opinions and approaches in the use of statistics as a tool for assessing phenomena and processes. Materials and methods. In the course of the study, the main directions of statistics as a tool for working with data were studied. The most common and practically justified is the use of statistics as a tool of cognition, management, propaganda and control. The result of the interpretation of statistical data primarily depends on the degree of objectivity and the level of literacy of those who work with the data: both at the initial stage of the formation of the initial data set, and at the stage of explaining the resulting values. Results. It is revealed that the same parameters (proportions) can be interpreted in completely different ways. Such differences are formed both from the subjectivity of the perception of these data, and from the degree of study of the material. As a result, there is a field for discrepancies and discussion. Conclusion. In order to obtain a qualitative analysis and interpretation of phenomena and processes, serious knowledge is needed, backed up by a substantial study of the subject area – only in this case statistical data can become a “mirror” reflecting the realities.","PeriodicalId":31319,"journal":{"name":"Statistika i Ekonomika","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika i Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2023-5-4-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that only with a competent comprehensive assessment of quantitative parameters, their qualitative interpretation is possible. Statistics acts as such a tool. The purpose of the study . The purpose of this paper is to study opinions and approaches in the use of statistics as a tool for assessing phenomena and processes. Materials and methods. In the course of the study, the main directions of statistics as a tool for working with data were studied. The most common and practically justified is the use of statistics as a tool of cognition, management, propaganda and control. The result of the interpretation of statistical data primarily depends on the degree of objectivity and the level of literacy of those who work with the data: both at the initial stage of the formation of the initial data set, and at the stage of explaining the resulting values. Results. It is revealed that the same parameters (proportions) can be interpreted in completely different ways. Such differences are formed both from the subjectivity of the perception of these data, and from the degree of study of the material. As a result, there is a field for discrepancies and discussion. Conclusion. In order to obtain a qualitative analysis and interpretation of phenomena and processes, serious knowledge is needed, backed up by a substantial study of the subject area – only in this case statistical data can become a “mirror” reflecting the realities.
统计作为意识形态对抗的工具
这项研究的相关性在于,只有对定量参数进行称职的全面评估,才有可能对其进行定性解释。统计学就是这样一种工具。研究的目的。本文的目的是研究使用统计作为评估现象和过程的工具的意见和方法。材料和方法。在研究过程中,研究了统计学作为数据处理工具的主要方向。最常见和最合理的是使用统计数据作为认知、管理、宣传和控制的工具。统计数据解释的结果主要取决于客观性的程度和数据处理人员的文化水平:在初始数据集形成的初始阶段,以及在解释结果值的阶段。结果。结果表明,相同的参数(比例)可以用完全不同的方式来解释。这种差异既来自对这些数据感知的主观性,也来自对材料的研究程度。因此,存在分歧和讨论的空间。结论。为了对现象和过程进行定性分析和解释,需要有认真的知识,并以对该主题领域的大量研究为后盾- -只有在这种情况下,统计数据才能成为反映现实的“镜子”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信