Analysis of the Challenge in Fake News and Misinformation Regulation Comparative in Global Media Landscape

Eugene Chan
{"title":"Analysis of the Challenge in Fake News and Misinformation Regulation Comparative in Global Media Landscape","authors":"Eugene Chan","doi":"10.1051/shsconf/202317802018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the age of online social platforms, increasing interactions beyond the wildest imagination, dealing with fake news has been the most challenging. Perhaps the most visible victims of fake news today are political individuals and institutions. The delicate balance between regulation and respect of individual rights and maintenance of constitutionalism in various countries today creates a unique regulatory dilemma that allows for fake news and the use of it to continue thriving. At the same time, politicians and other institutions occupy a critical role in creating legislation towards combatting fake news. Such moves could significantly undermine the ability to observe some of the fundamental rights of individuals and the overall rule of democracy [1]. Misinformation and other cases of fake news have a relatively significant impact on societies. However, resolving fake news has proved not to be easy because of numerous issues, among them, being the need to preserve fundamental rights [2]. Desktop-based research has been conducted to achieve the objectives of this research. Critical to note that most of the information vital in completing this research is electronically availed. Hence, secondary sources of information have been utilized to reach conclusions on the existence of regulations and its effectiveness toward combating fake news in the three jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":438466,"journal":{"name":"SHS Web of Conferences","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHS Web of Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317802018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the age of online social platforms, increasing interactions beyond the wildest imagination, dealing with fake news has been the most challenging. Perhaps the most visible victims of fake news today are political individuals and institutions. The delicate balance between regulation and respect of individual rights and maintenance of constitutionalism in various countries today creates a unique regulatory dilemma that allows for fake news and the use of it to continue thriving. At the same time, politicians and other institutions occupy a critical role in creating legislation towards combatting fake news. Such moves could significantly undermine the ability to observe some of the fundamental rights of individuals and the overall rule of democracy [1]. Misinformation and other cases of fake news have a relatively significant impact on societies. However, resolving fake news has proved not to be easy because of numerous issues, among them, being the need to preserve fundamental rights [2]. Desktop-based research has been conducted to achieve the objectives of this research. Critical to note that most of the information vital in completing this research is electronically availed. Hence, secondary sources of information have been utilized to reach conclusions on the existence of regulations and its effectiveness toward combating fake news in the three jurisdictions.
假新闻与错误信息监管的挑战分析——全球媒体格局比较
在网络社交平台时代,互动的增加超出了最疯狂的想象,处理假新闻一直是最具挑战性的。也许今天假新闻最明显的受害者是政治人物和机构。如今,各国在监管与尊重个人权利以及维护宪政之间的微妙平衡,造成了一种独特的监管困境,使得假新闻及其利用得以继续蓬勃发展。与此同时,政治家和其他机构在制定打击假新闻的立法方面发挥着关键作用。这样的举动可能会严重削弱观察个人某些基本权利和整体民主统治的能力[1]。错误信息和其他假新闻对社会产生了相对重大的影响。然而,事实证明,解决假新闻并非易事,因为存在许多问题,其中包括需要维护基本权利[2]。为了实现本研究的目标,进行了基于桌面的研究。重要的是要注意,完成这项研究的大多数重要信息都是通过电子方式获得的。因此,二手信息来源已被用来得出结论,在三个司法管辖区存在的法规及其有效性,以打击假新闻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信