Evaluation of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid testing and HIV nucleic acid testing for blood donors

IF 0.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
NessrinGhazi Alabdallat, Hana Alanazi, Hadeel Alyenbaawi, Sahar Aldosari, Sadaf Jahan
{"title":"Evaluation of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid testing and HIV nucleic acid testing for blood donors","authors":"NessrinGhazi Alabdallat, Hana Alanazi, Hadeel Alyenbaawi, Sahar Aldosari, Sadaf Jahan","doi":"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_80_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the HCV NAT test and HIV NAT test in the recognition of the presence of RNA of HCV and HIV in blood samples from blood donors. Materials and Methods: We collected 2124 specimens of blood from male volunteer blood donors with their age group of 18–60 years who were visiting the blood bank of King Khalid Hospital, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia, from January 2021 to May 2022. The samples from each donor were screened for anti-HCV and HIV Ab-Ag by commercial immunoassays and for qualitative assessments of RNA of HIV-1, HIV-2, and HCV in plasma specimens from each donor of blood by NAT testing. Results: Of the 2124 blood donors studied, 10 (0.47%) were positive for anti-HCV. HCV-NAT testing was non-reactive in all Anti-HCV -positive subjects 100% (10/10), and 1/2114 (0,05%) for Anti-HCV- negative donors was reactive and 2113 (99.95%) were non-reactive. HIV-NAT testing was nonreactive in 100% (2124/2124) of HIV Ab-Ag-negative subjects. Conclusions: The effectiveness of introducing the NAT test was attempted to be evaluated as the implementation of NAT technology has to be thoroughly evaluated for the actual yield in blood safety achieved must be assessed.","PeriodicalId":8534,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_80_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the HCV NAT test and HIV NAT test in the recognition of the presence of RNA of HCV and HIV in blood samples from blood donors. Materials and Methods: We collected 2124 specimens of blood from male volunteer blood donors with their age group of 18–60 years who were visiting the blood bank of King Khalid Hospital, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia, from January 2021 to May 2022. The samples from each donor were screened for anti-HCV and HIV Ab-Ag by commercial immunoassays and for qualitative assessments of RNA of HIV-1, HIV-2, and HCV in plasma specimens from each donor of blood by NAT testing. Results: Of the 2124 blood donors studied, 10 (0.47%) were positive for anti-HCV. HCV-NAT testing was non-reactive in all Anti-HCV -positive subjects 100% (10/10), and 1/2114 (0,05%) for Anti-HCV- negative donors was reactive and 2113 (99.95%) were non-reactive. HIV-NAT testing was nonreactive in 100% (2124/2124) of HIV Ab-Ag-negative subjects. Conclusions: The effectiveness of introducing the NAT test was attempted to be evaluated as the implementation of NAT technology has to be thoroughly evaluated for the actual yield in blood safety achieved must be assessed.
献血者丙型肝炎病毒核酸检测和HIV核酸检测的评价
目的:评价HCV NAT检测和HIV NAT检测对献血者血液样本中HCV和HIV RNA的识别作用。材料与方法:从2021年1月至2022年5月在沙特阿拉伯Al-Majmaah哈立德国王医院血库就诊的18-60岁男性志愿献血者中采集了2124份血液标本。通过商业免疫分析对每个供血者的样本进行抗HCV和HIV抗体- ag筛查,并通过NAT检测对每个供血者血浆标本中HIV-1、HIV-2和HCV的RNA进行定性评估。结果:在研究的2124名献血者中,抗- hcv阳性10人(0.47%)。所有抗- hcv阳性受试者的HCV-NAT检测100%(10/10)无反应,抗- hcv阴性供者的1/2114(0.05%)无反应,2113(99.95%)无反应。HIV- nat检测在100%(2124/2124)的HIV ab - ag阴性受试者中无反应。结论:引入NAT检测的有效性有待于对NAT技术的实施进行彻底的评估,血液安全的实际产量也有待于评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信